Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Heather Tallis

Biographic Data

ID352404
NAMEHeather Tallis
GIVEN NAMESHeather
FAMILY NAMETallis
SIGNATURETALLIS H
AFFILIATIONSThe Nature Conservancy
ORCID0009-0003-5977-6655
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS16
TOTAL CITATIONS300
WORKS AS AUTHOR16
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2008
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2021
H-INDEX5
  • Does Life Satisfaction Vary with Time and Income? Investigating the Relationship Among Free Time, Income, and Life Satisfaction

    Open Access•Yuta J Masuda, Jason R Williams et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Happiness Studies•2021

  • Aligning evidence generation and use across health, development, and environment

    Open Access•Heather Tallis, Katharine Kreis et al.•ARTICLE•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2019•References: 6

    Although health, development, and environment challenges are interconnected, evidence remains fractured across sectors due to methodological and conceptual differences in research and practice. Aligned methods are needed to support Sustainable Development Goal advances and similar agendas. The Bridge Collaborative, an emergent research-practice collaboration, presents principles and recommendations that help harmonize methods for evidence generat…

  • Cross-discipline evidence principles for sustainability policy

    Open Access•Edward T Game, Heather Tallis et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Sustainability•2018•Cited by: 5•References: 6

  • Consequences of integrating livestock and wildlife in an African savanna

    Open Access•Felicia Keesing, Richard S Ostfeld et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Sustainability•2018•Cited by: 4•References: 2

  • A Measure Whose Time has Come

    Open Access•Jason R Williams, Jason Williams et al.•ARTICLE•Social Indicators Research•2016•Cited by: 40•References: 37

  • Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions

    Open Access•Anne D Guerry, Stephen Polasky et al.•ARTICLE•Proceedings of the National…•2015

    The central challenge of the 21st century is to develop economic, social, and governance systems capable of ending poverty and achieving sustainable levels of population and consumption while securing the life-support systems underpinning current and future human well-being. Essential to meeting this challenge is the incorporation of natural capital and the ecosystem services it provides into decision-making. We explore progress and crucial gaps …

  • Towards integrated social–ecological sustainability indicators

    Open Access•Odirilwe Selomane, Belinda Reyers et al.•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2015

  • National indicators for observing ecosystem service change

    Open Access•Daniel S Karp, Heather Tallis et al.•ARTICLE•Global Environmental Change•2015•Cited by: 4•References: 4

  • Mitigation for one & all

    Open Access•Heather Tallis, Cynthia M Kennedy et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2015•Cited by: 16•References: 72

    Emerging development policies and lending standards call for consideration of ecosystem services when mitigating impacts from development, yet little guidance exists to inform this process. Here we propose a comprehensive framework for advancing both biodiversity and ecosystem service mitigation. We have clarified a means for choosing representative ecosystem service targets alongside biodiversity targets, identified servicesheds as a useful spat…

  • Working together

    Open Access•Heather Tallis, Jane Lubchenco•ARTICLE•Nature•2014

  • The Ipbes Conceptual Framework — connecting nature and people

    Open Access•Sandra Dı́az, Sebsebe Demissew et al.•ARTICLE•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2014•Cited by: 174•References: 16

    The first public product of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) is its Conceptual Framework. This conceptual and analytical tool, presented here in detail, will underpin all IPBES functions and provide structure and comparability to the syntheses that IPBES will produce at different spatial scales, on different themes, and in different regions. Salient innovative aspects of the IPBES Conceptual Framework …

  • Notes from the field

    Open Access•Mary Ruckelshaus, Emily McKenzie et al.•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2013•Cited by: 57•References: 5

    While there have been rapid advances in assessments of biodiversity and ecosystem services (BES), a critical remaining challenge is how to move from scientific knowledge to real-world decision making. We offer 6 lessons from our experiences applying new approaches and tools for quantifying BES in 20 pilot demonstrations: (1) Applying a BES approach is most effective in leading to policy change as part of an iterative science-policy process; (2) s…

  • Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales

    Open Access•Erik Nelson, Guillermo Mendoza et al.•ARTICLE•Frontiers in Ecology and the…•2009

    Nature provides a wide range of benefits to people. There is increasing consensus about the importance of incorporating these “ecosystem services” into resource management decisions, but quantifying the levels and values of these services has proven difficult. We use a spatially explicit modeling tool, Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST), to predict changes in ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, and commod…

  • Mapping and Valuing Ecosystem Services as an Approach for Conservation and Natural‐Resource Management

    Open Access•Heather Tallis, Stephen Polasky•ARTICLE•Annals of the New York Academy of…•2009

    Current approaches to conservation and natural‐resource management often focus on single objectives, resulting in many unintended consequences. These outcomes often affect society through unaccounted‐for ecosystem services. A major challenge in moving to a more ecosystem‐based approach to management that would avoid such societal damages is the creation of practical tools that bring a scientifically sound, production function‐based approach to na…

  • Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife-friendly farming?

    Open Access•Joern Fischer, Berry J Brosi et al.•ARTICLE•Frontiers in Ecology and the…•2008

    As the demands on agricultural lands to produce food, fuel, and fiber continue to expand, effective strategies are urgently needed to balance biodiversity conservation and agricultural production. “Land sparing” and “wildlife-friendly farming” have been proposed as seemingly opposing strategies to achieve this balance. In land sparing, homogeneous areas of farmland are managed to maximize yields, while separate reserves target biodiversity conser…

  • An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development

    Open Access•Heather Tallis, Peter Kareiva et al.•ARTICLE•Proceedings of the National…•2008

    The core idea of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment is that the human condition is tightly linked to environmental condition. This assertion suggests that conservation and development projects should be able to achieve both ecological and social progress without detracting from their primary objectives. Whereas “win–win” projects that achieve both conservation and economic gains are a commendable goal, they are not easy to attain. An analysis of…

  • The Ipbes Conceptual Framework — connecting nature and people

    Open Access•Sandra Dı́az, Sebsebe Demissew et al.•ARTICLE•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2014•Cited by: 174•References: 16

    The first public product of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) is its Conceptual Framework. This conceptual and analytical tool, presented here in detail, will underpin all IPBES functions and provide structure and comparability to the syntheses that IPBES will produce at different spatial scales, on different themes, and in different regions. Salient innovative aspects of the IPBES Conceptual Framework …

  • Notes from the field

    Open Access•Mary Ruckelshaus, Emily McKenzie et al.•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2013•Cited by: 57•References: 5

    While there have been rapid advances in assessments of biodiversity and ecosystem services (BES), a critical remaining challenge is how to move from scientific knowledge to real-world decision making. We offer 6 lessons from our experiences applying new approaches and tools for quantifying BES in 20 pilot demonstrations: (1) Applying a BES approach is most effective in leading to policy change as part of an iterative science-policy process; (2) s…

  • A Measure Whose Time has Come

    Open Access•Jason R Williams, Jason Williams et al.•ARTICLE•Social Indicators Research•2016•Cited by: 40•References: 37

  • Mitigation for one & all

    Open Access•Heather Tallis, Cynthia M Kennedy et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2015•Cited by: 16•References: 72

    Emerging development policies and lending standards call for consideration of ecosystem services when mitigating impacts from development, yet little guidance exists to inform this process. Here we propose a comprehensive framework for advancing both biodiversity and ecosystem service mitigation. We have clarified a means for choosing representative ecosystem service targets alongside biodiversity targets, identified servicesheds as a useful spat…

  • Cross-discipline evidence principles for sustainability policy

    Open Access•Edward T Game, Heather Tallis et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Sustainability•2018•Cited by: 5•References: 6

  • Consequences of integrating livestock and wildlife in an African savanna

    Open Access•Felicia Keesing, Richard S Ostfeld et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Sustainability•2018•Cited by: 4•References: 2

  • National indicators for observing ecosystem service change

    Open Access•Daniel S Karp, Heather Tallis et al.•ARTICLE•Global Environmental Change•2015•Cited by: 4•References: 4

  • Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife-friendly farming?

    Open Access•Joern Fischer, Berry J Brosi et al.•ARTICLE•Frontiers in Ecology and the…•2008

    As the demands on agricultural lands to produce food, fuel, and fiber continue to expand, effective strategies are urgently needed to balance biodiversity conservation and agricultural production. “Land sparing” and “wildlife-friendly farming” have been proposed as seemingly opposing strategies to achieve this balance. In land sparing, homogeneous areas of farmland are managed to maximize yields, while separate reserves target biodiversity conser…

  • An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development

    Open Access•Heather Tallis, Peter Kareiva et al.•ARTICLE•Proceedings of the National…•2008

    The core idea of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment is that the human condition is tightly linked to environmental condition. This assertion suggests that conservation and development projects should be able to achieve both ecological and social progress without detracting from their primary objectives. Whereas “win–win” projects that achieve both conservation and economic gains are a commendable goal, they are not easy to attain. An analysis of…

  • Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales

    Open Access•Erik Nelson, Guillermo Mendoza et al.•ARTICLE•Frontiers in Ecology and the…•2009

    Nature provides a wide range of benefits to people. There is increasing consensus about the importance of incorporating these “ecosystem services” into resource management decisions, but quantifying the levels and values of these services has proven difficult. We use a spatially explicit modeling tool, Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST), to predict changes in ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, and commod…

  • Mapping and Valuing Ecosystem Services as an Approach for Conservation and Natural‐Resource Management

    Open Access•Heather Tallis, Stephen Polasky•ARTICLE•Annals of the New York Academy of…•2009

    Current approaches to conservation and natural‐resource management often focus on single objectives, resulting in many unintended consequences. These outcomes often affect society through unaccounted‐for ecosystem services. A major challenge in moving to a more ecosystem‐based approach to management that would avoid such societal damages is the creation of practical tools that bring a scientifically sound, production function‐based approach to na…

  • Notes from the field

    Open Access•Mary Ruckelshaus, Emily McKenzie et al.•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2013•Cited by: 57•References: 5

    While there have been rapid advances in assessments of biodiversity and ecosystem services (BES), a critical remaining challenge is how to move from scientific knowledge to real-world decision making. We offer 6 lessons from our experiences applying new approaches and tools for quantifying BES in 20 pilot demonstrations: (1) Applying a BES approach is most effective in leading to policy change as part of an iterative science-policy process; (2) s…

  • Working together

    Open Access•Heather Tallis, Jane Lubchenco•ARTICLE•Nature•2014

  • The Ipbes Conceptual Framework — connecting nature and people

    Open Access•Sandra Dı́az, Sebsebe Demissew et al.•ARTICLE•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2014•Cited by: 174•References: 16

    The first public product of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) is its Conceptual Framework. This conceptual and analytical tool, presented here in detail, will underpin all IPBES functions and provide structure and comparability to the syntheses that IPBES will produce at different spatial scales, on different themes, and in different regions. Salient innovative aspects of the IPBES Conceptual Framework …

  • Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions

    Open Access•Anne D Guerry, Stephen Polasky et al.•ARTICLE•Proceedings of the National…•2015

    The central challenge of the 21st century is to develop economic, social, and governance systems capable of ending poverty and achieving sustainable levels of population and consumption while securing the life-support systems underpinning current and future human well-being. Essential to meeting this challenge is the incorporation of natural capital and the ecosystem services it provides into decision-making. We explore progress and crucial gaps …

  • Towards integrated social–ecological sustainability indicators

    Open Access•Odirilwe Selomane, Belinda Reyers et al.•ARTICLE•Ecological Economics•2015

  • National indicators for observing ecosystem service change

    Open Access•Daniel S Karp, Heather Tallis et al.•ARTICLE•Global Environmental Change•2015•Cited by: 4•References: 4

  • Mitigation for one & all

    Open Access•Heather Tallis, Cynthia M Kennedy et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2015•Cited by: 16•References: 72

    Emerging development policies and lending standards call for consideration of ecosystem services when mitigating impacts from development, yet little guidance exists to inform this process. Here we propose a comprehensive framework for advancing both biodiversity and ecosystem service mitigation. We have clarified a means for choosing representative ecosystem service targets alongside biodiversity targets, identified servicesheds as a useful spat…

  • A Measure Whose Time has Come

    Open Access•Jason R Williams, Jason Williams et al.•ARTICLE•Social Indicators Research•2016•Cited by: 40•References: 37

  • Cross-discipline evidence principles for sustainability policy

    Open Access•Edward T Game, Heather Tallis et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Sustainability•2018•Cited by: 5•References: 6

  • Consequences of integrating livestock and wildlife in an African savanna

    Open Access•Felicia Keesing, Richard S Ostfeld et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Sustainability•2018•Cited by: 4•References: 2

  • Aligning evidence generation and use across health, development, and environment

    Open Access•Heather Tallis, Katharine Kreis et al.•ARTICLE•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2019•References: 6

    Although health, development, and environment challenges are interconnected, evidence remains fractured across sectors due to methodological and conceptual differences in research and practice. Aligned methods are needed to support Sustainable Development Goal advances and similar agendas. The Bridge Collaborative, an emergent research-practice collaboration, presents principles and recommendations that help harmonize methods for evidence generat…

  • Does Life Satisfaction Vary with Time and Income? Investigating the Relationship Among Free Time, Income, and Life Satisfaction

    Open Access•Yuta J Masuda, Jason R Williams et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Happiness Studies•2021

Environmental resource management (12 works) · Business (11 works) · Economics (10 works) · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (9 works) · Land Use and Ecosystem Services (9 works) · Economic and Environmental Valuation (8 works) · Ecosystem (8 works) · Ecosystem services (8 works) · Ecology (7 works) · Environmental Science (7 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae