Maxwell J Smith
Biographic Data
| ID | 3581242 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Maxwell J Smith |
| GIVEN NAMES | Maxwell J |
| FAMILY NAME | Smith |
| SIGNATURE | SMITH M J |
| AFFILIATIONS | Western University |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-5230-0548 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 34 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 19 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 34 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2011 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
Informed consent when vaccination is mandatory
Do vaccine mandates impair the voluntariness of informed consent
An ethical and legal obligation generally exists for informed consent to be obtained prior to the administration of medical interventions. This includes vaccinations. For an individual’s informed consent to be valid, it must be given voluntarily . Hence, when individuals are required to be vaccinated—for example, as a condition of employment—we might ask whether this impairs the voluntariness of their informed consent, thereby rendering it invali…
Achieving equity to fully realise the pandemic agreement
box The values articulated in the Pandemic Agreement (PA)—including equity, solidarity and trust—are important building blocks in attempts to facilitate the global development and distribution of vaccines and other technologies in future outbreaks and pandemics
Advancing collaborative research for health
The calls for health research to be collaborative are ubiquitous—even as part of a recent World Health Assembly resolution on clinical trials—yet the arguments in support of collaborative research have been taken for granted and are absent in the literature. This article provides three arguments to justify why health research ought to be collaborative and discusses trade-offs to be considered among the ethical values guiding each argument
Sustainability in the pandemic accord
Careful consideration of ethical principles and their ramifications continues to be central to pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, as reflected in the latest iteration of the pandemic accord
The ethics of firing unvaccinated employees
Some organisations make vaccination a condition of employment. This means prospective employees must demonstrate they have been vaccinated (eg, against measles) to be hired. But it also means organisations must decide whether existing employees should be expected to meet newly introduced vaccination conditions (eg, against COVID-19). Unlike prospective employees who will not be hired if they do not meet vaccination conditions, existing employees …
The intervention ladder and the ethical appraisal of systemic public health interventions
Digital health literacy, vaccine information sources, and vaccine acceptance among parents in Ontario
Parents make important vaccination decisions for their children and many variables affect parents’ decisions to accept or decline vaccines. Parents are tasked with locating, understanding, and applying information to inform health decisions often using online resources; however, the digital health literacy levels of parents are unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate parents’ digital health literacy levels, their sources for vaccine…
Bridging ethics and epidemiology
Health inequities are differences in health that are 'unjust'. Yet, despite competing ethical views about what counts as an 'unjust difference in health', theoretical insights from ethics have not been systematically integrated into epidemiological research. Using diabetes as an example, we explore the impact of adopting different ethical standards of health equity on population health outcomes. Specifically, we explore how the implementation of …
Institutional trust is a distinct construct related to vaccine hesitancy and refusal
Based on our findings, we suggest that diminished institutional trust plays a crucial role in vaccine hesitancy. We propose that this may contribute to a tendency to instead place trust in interpersonally propagated belief systems, which may be more strongly misaligned with mainstream evidence and thus support vaccine hesitancy attitudes. We offer strategies rooted in these observations for creating public health messages designed to enhance vacc…
Evaluating potential unintended consequences of Covid-19 vaccine mandates and passports
R&D during public health emergencies
In January 2021, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director–general of the WHO, warned that the world was ‘on the brink of a catastrophic moral failure [that] will be paid with lives and livelihoods in the world’s poorest countries’. We are now past the brink. Many high-income countries have vaccinated their populations (which, in some cases, includes third and even fourth doses) and are loosening public health and social measures, while low-income …
Between rules and resistance
In times of a public health emergency, lawyers and ethicists play a key role in ensuring that government responses, such as travel restrictions, are both legally and ethically justified. However, when travel bans were imposed in a broadly discriminatory manner against southern African countries in response to the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant in late 2021, considerations of law, ethics or science did not appear to guide politicians’ decisions. Rathe…
Why we should not ‘just use age’ for Covid-19 vaccine prioritisation
Older age is one of the greatest risk factors for severe outcomes from COVID-19. If we believe it is important to use limited supplies of COVID-19 vaccines to protect the most vulnerable and prevent deaths, then available doses should be allocated with significant priority to older adults. Yet, we should resist the conclusion that age should be the sole criterion for COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation or that no younger populations (eg, those under …
An intersectional human rights approach to prioritising access to Covid-19 vaccines
We finally have a vaccine for the COVID-19 crisis. However, due to the limited numbers of the vaccine, states will have to consider how to prioritise groups who receive the vaccine. In this paper, we argue that the practical implementation of human rights law requires broader consideration of intersectional needs in society and the disproportionate impact that COVID-19 is having on population groups with pre-existing social and medical vulnerabil…
Mere rhetoric? Using solidarity as a moral guide for deliberations on border closures, border reopenings and travel restrictions in the age of Covid-19
box > Every government is responsible for, and accountable to, its own people. But Member States can only truly keep their own people safe if they are accountable to each other at the global level. > > - Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, 74th World Health Assembly, 31 May 20211 As we enter the second half of 2021, the global health community continues to be vexed by the following question: what justifies states’ continued use of international trave…
Ethical and policy considerations for Covid-19 vaccination modalities
Background To investigate whether neonatal hyperglycaemia in the first postnatal week is associated with treatment-demanding retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Methods This is a Danish national, retrospective, case–control study of premature infants (birth period 2003–2006). Three national registers were searched, and data were linked through a unique civil registration number. The study sample consisted of 106 cases each matched with two comparis…
Informing ‘good’ global health research partnerships
Background: Several sets of principles have been proposed to guide global health research partnerships and mitigate inequities inadvertently caused by them. The existence of multiple sets of principles poses a challenge for those seeking to critically engage with and develop their practice. Which of these is best to use, and why? To what extent, if any, is there agreement across proposed principles?Objective: The objectives of this review were to…
What do we mean by critical and ethical global engagement? Questions from a research partnership between universities in Canada and Rwanda
Language - the words we use - can play a key role in enabling or limiting transformation of inequalities in the field of global health. At the same time, given the interdisciplinary, intersectoral, and international nature of much global health work, intended meanings, commitments, and underlying values for words used cannot be taken for granted. This commentary sets out to clarify, and in this manner render available for further discussion and d…
Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19
Covid-19 is officially a pandemic. It is a novel infection with serious clinical manifestations, including death, and it has reached at least 124 countries and territories. Although the ultimate course and impact of Covid-19 are uncertain, it is not merely possible but likely that the disease will produce enough severe illness to overwhelm health care infrastructure. Emerging viral pandemics “can place extraordinary and sustained demands on publi…
Setting Health‐Care Priorities
Publication Ethics During Public Health Emergencies Such as the Covid-19 Pandemic
Published online ahead of print May 14, 2020: e1-e2. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2020.305686)
Social distancing, social justice, and risk during the Covid-19 pandemic
Public Health as Social Justice? A Qualitative Study of Public Health Policy-Makers' Perspectives
Is ‘health equity’ bad for our health? A qualitative empirical ethics study of public health policy-makers’ perspectives
Disadvantaging the Disadvantaged
Social distancing, social justice, and risk during the Covid-19 pandemic
Limiting Rights and Freedoms in the Context of Ebola and Other Public Health Emergencies
One of the key components of CESCR General Comment No. 14: The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health (GC 14) is the recognition that human rights are necessarily interdependent and that the social determinants of health are important to the promotion of health itself; as stated in paragraph 3 "...other [human] rights and freedoms [e.g., food, housing] address integral components of the right to health." GC 14, paragraph 16 maintains …
Public Health as Social Justice? A Qualitative Study of Public Health Policy-Makers' Perspectives
Is ‘health equity’ bad for our health? A qualitative empirical ethics study of public health policy-makers’ perspectives
Restrictive Measures in an Influenza Pandemic
Publication Ethics During Public Health Emergencies Such as the Covid-19 Pandemic
Published online ahead of print May 14, 2020: e1-e2. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2020.305686)
Victimless vapour? Health care organizations should restrict the use of e-cigarettes
The duty to care in an influenza pandemic
Rights vs. Liberty
Priority setting of ICU resources in an influenza pandemic
Our findings underscore the importance of public consultation in pandemic planning for sustaining public trust in a public health emergency. Participants appreciated the empirical and ethical uncertainty of decision-making in an influenza pandemic and demonstrated nuanced ethical reasoning about priority setting of intensive care resources in an influenza pandemic. Policymakers may benefit from a better understanding the public's empirical and et…
Restrictive Measures in an Influenza Pandemic
The duty to care in an influenza pandemic
Casting Light and Doubt on Uncontrolled DCDD Protocols
The ever‐increasing demand for organs led Spain, France, and other European countries to promote uncontrolled donation after circulatory determination of death (uDCDD). For the same reason, New York City has recently developed its own uDCDD protocol, which differs from European programs in some key ways. The New York protocol incorporates a series of technical and management improvements that address some practical problems identified in response…
Disadvantaging the Disadvantaged
A Vaping Matter
Although there is no federal legislation yet on e‐cigarettes, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration proposed regulations in April 2014 that would prohibit sales of e‐cigarettes to anyone under eighteen and require that they be approved by the FDA as a tobacco product and carry warning labels for consumers on their packaging. (The proposed regulations have been characterized as conservative, however, because they do not restrict e‐cigarettes that …
Limiting Rights and Freedoms in the Context of Ebola and Other Public Health Emergencies
One of the key components of CESCR General Comment No. 14: The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health (GC 14) is the recognition that human rights are necessarily interdependent and that the social determinants of health are important to the promotion of health itself; as stated in paragraph 3 "...other [human] rights and freedoms [e.g., food, housing] address integral components of the right to health." GC 14, paragraph 16 maintains …
Victimless vapour? Health care organizations should restrict the use of e-cigarettes
Is ‘health equity’ bad for our health? A qualitative empirical ethics study of public health policy-makers’ perspectives
Public Health as Social Justice? A Qualitative Study of Public Health Policy-Makers' Perspectives
Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19
Covid-19 is officially a pandemic. It is a novel infection with serious clinical manifestations, including death, and it has reached at least 124 countries and territories. Although the ultimate course and impact of Covid-19 are uncertain, it is not merely possible but likely that the disease will produce enough severe illness to overwhelm health care infrastructure. Emerging viral pandemics “can place extraordinary and sustained demands on publi…
Setting Health‐Care Priorities
Publication Ethics During Public Health Emergencies Such as the Covid-19 Pandemic
Published online ahead of print May 14, 2020: e1-e2. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2020.305686)
Social distancing, social justice, and risk during the Covid-19 pandemic
An intersectional human rights approach to prioritising access to Covid-19 vaccines
We finally have a vaccine for the COVID-19 crisis. However, due to the limited numbers of the vaccine, states will have to consider how to prioritise groups who receive the vaccine. In this paper, we argue that the practical implementation of human rights law requires broader consideration of intersectional needs in society and the disproportionate impact that COVID-19 is having on population groups with pre-existing social and medical vulnerabil…
Mere rhetoric? Using solidarity as a moral guide for deliberations on border closures, border reopenings and travel restrictions in the age of Covid-19
box > Every government is responsible for, and accountable to, its own people. But Member States can only truly keep their own people safe if they are accountable to each other at the global level. > > - Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, 74th World Health Assembly, 31 May 20211 As we enter the second half of 2021, the global health community continues to be vexed by the following question: what justifies states’ continued use of international trave…
Ethical and policy considerations for Covid-19 vaccination modalities
Background To investigate whether neonatal hyperglycaemia in the first postnatal week is associated with treatment-demanding retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Methods This is a Danish national, retrospective, case–control study of premature infants (birth period 2003–2006). Three national registers were searched, and data were linked through a unique civil registration number. The study sample consisted of 106 cases each matched with two comparis…
Informing ‘good’ global health research partnerships
Background: Several sets of principles have been proposed to guide global health research partnerships and mitigate inequities inadvertently caused by them. The existence of multiple sets of principles poses a challenge for those seeking to critically engage with and develop their practice. Which of these is best to use, and why? To what extent, if any, is there agreement across proposed principles?Objective: The objectives of this review were to…
What do we mean by critical and ethical global engagement? Questions from a research partnership between universities in Canada and Rwanda
Language - the words we use - can play a key role in enabling or limiting transformation of inequalities in the field of global health. At the same time, given the interdisciplinary, intersectoral, and international nature of much global health work, intended meanings, commitments, and underlying values for words used cannot be taken for granted. This commentary sets out to clarify, and in this manner render available for further discussion and d…
Evaluating potential unintended consequences of Covid-19 vaccine mandates and passports
R&D during public health emergencies
In January 2021, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director–general of the WHO, warned that the world was ‘on the brink of a catastrophic moral failure [that] will be paid with lives and livelihoods in the world’s poorest countries’. We are now past the brink. Many high-income countries have vaccinated their populations (which, in some cases, includes third and even fourth doses) and are loosening public health and social measures, while low-income …
Between rules and resistance
In times of a public health emergency, lawyers and ethicists play a key role in ensuring that government responses, such as travel restrictions, are both legally and ethically justified. However, when travel bans were imposed in a broadly discriminatory manner against southern African countries in response to the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant in late 2021, considerations of law, ethics or science did not appear to guide politicians’ decisions. Rathe…
Why we should not ‘just use age’ for Covid-19 vaccine prioritisation
Older age is one of the greatest risk factors for severe outcomes from COVID-19. If we believe it is important to use limited supplies of COVID-19 vaccines to protect the most vulnerable and prevent deaths, then available doses should be allocated with significant priority to older adults. Yet, we should resist the conclusion that age should be the sole criterion for COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation or that no younger populations (eg, those under …
Bridging ethics and epidemiology
Health inequities are differences in health that are 'unjust'. Yet, despite competing ethical views about what counts as an 'unjust difference in health', theoretical insights from ethics have not been systematically integrated into epidemiological research. Using diabetes as an example, we explore the impact of adopting different ethical standards of health equity on population health outcomes. Specifically, we explore how the implementation of …
Medicine (28 works) · Political science (25 works) · Law (21 works) · Public health (15 works) · Nursing (14 works) · Sociology (13 works) · Environmental health (10 works) · Law (10 works) · Pandemic (10 works) · Psychology (10 works)