Anna Santos
Biographic Data
| ID | 3590088 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Anna Santos |
| GIVEN NAMES | Anna |
| FAMILY NAME | Santos |
| SIGNATURE | SANTOS Â |
| AFFILIATIONS | Virginia Tech |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-2056-0892 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 7 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 5 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2015 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Divergent values and perspectives drive three distinct viewpoints on grizzly bear reintroduction in Washington, the United States
The success or failure of apex carnivore reintroduction efforts can hinge on understanding and attending to diverse viewpoints of those involved in and impacted by reintroductions. Yet, viewpoints vary widely due to a suite of complex and intersecting factors, such as values, beliefs and sociocultural context. We ask, ‘what are the diverse viewpoints that exist surrounding apex carnivore recovery and what kinds of emotional, analytical and values…
Characteristics and motivations of participants and nonparticipants in an at-risk species conservation program
The majority of species at risk of being listed under the United States (U.S.) Endangered Species Act (ESA) relies on habitat located on privately owned land (Turner & Rylander, 1998). There are nu
Tracking a Governance Transition
Jesse Abramsa*, Heidi Huber-Stearnsb, Hannah Gosnellc, Anna Santob, Stacie Duffeyd & Cassandra Moseleyba Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA; b Ecosystem Workforce Program, Institute for a Sustainable Environment, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA; c College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA; d Planning,…
Examining Private Landowners’ Knowledge Systems for an Invasive Species
A human-centered approach to designing invasive species eradication programs on human-inhabited islands
Tracking a Governance Transition
Jesse Abramsa*, Heidi Huber-Stearnsb, Hannah Gosnellc, Anna Santob, Stacie Duffeyd & Cassandra Moseleyba Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA; b Ecosystem Workforce Program, Institute for a Sustainable Environment, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA; c College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA; d Planning,…
A human-centered approach to designing invasive species eradication programs on human-inhabited islands
A human-centered approach to designing invasive species eradication programs on human-inhabited islands
Examining Private Landowners’ Knowledge Systems for an Invasive Species
Tracking a Governance Transition
Jesse Abramsa*, Heidi Huber-Stearnsb, Hannah Gosnellc, Anna Santob, Stacie Duffeyd & Cassandra Moseleyba Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA; b Ecosystem Workforce Program, Institute for a Sustainable Environment, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA; c College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA; d Planning,…
Characteristics and motivations of participants and nonparticipants in an at-risk species conservation program
The majority of species at risk of being listed under the United States (U.S.) Endangered Species Act (ESA) relies on habitat located on privately owned land (Turner & Rylander, 1998). There are nu
Divergent values and perspectives drive three distinct viewpoints on grizzly bear reintroduction in Washington, the United States
The success or failure of apex carnivore reintroduction efforts can hinge on understanding and attending to diverse viewpoints of those involved in and impacted by reintroductions. Yet, viewpoints vary widely due to a suite of complex and intersecting factors, such as values, beliefs and sociocultural context. We ask, ‘what are the diverse viewpoints that exist surrounding apex carnivore recovery and what kinds of emotional, analytical and values…
Geography (5 works) · Environmental resource management (4 works) · Business (3 works) · Ecology (3 works) · Environmental planning (3 works) · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 works) · Ecology and biodiversity studies (2 works) · Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 works) · Economics (2 works) · Environmental Science (2 works)