Ceily L Moore
Biographic Data
| ID | 3590931 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Ceily L Moore |
| GIVEN NAMES | Ceily L |
| FAMILY NAME | Moore |
| SIGNATURE | MOORE C L |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Illinois Chicago |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-3281-0457 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 11 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 5 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Toward Racial Equity: Navigating Diverse Conceptualizations and Perspectives in Social Justice-Oriented Evaluation Practice
The effects of race can manifest in various ways in evaluation contexts, making it critical for evaluators to unpack how race and racism are “complex and destructive forces” for racially minoritized and Indigenous communities. The clarion calls by evaluators on the need for greater attention to issues of race and racism in evaluation underscore the profound urgency to investigate the topic now, given that evaluation can be an important driver in …
Reporting Lines of Inquiry: Documenting Evaluations and Making Values Explicit
The Program Evaluation Standards call for “rigorous documentation of evaluations” and emphasize evaluators’ responsibility to make explicit the key values that shape evaluations. Clear, complete, values-attentive evaluation reporting is necessary so constituents can understand, learn from, critique, improve, and take action based on evaluations. Yet, scholars have documented gaps in reporting that can limit understanding of evaluations. In this p…
It Has to Be the Common Thread: Weaving Attention to Racial Equity and Justice Across Lines of Inquiry and Evaluative Criteria
Evaluators must attend to the destructive forces of racialization and racism to contribute to social transformation. Thus, evaluators are called to center culture, context, equity, and social justice during each step of the evaluation process. Here, we focus on the step(s) in which evaluators define program quality and specify evaluative lines of inquiry. We interviewed 29 social justice-oriented evaluators to examine lines of inquiry for program…
Identifying Risk and Protective Factors in Research on Mental Health and Black American Adolescents: 1990 Through 2022
This literature review synthesizes research on Black American adolescents' mental health published between 1990 and 2022 to identify prominent risk factors and highlight key protective factors for their mental health. Two research questions guided this review: (a) How did researchers examine mental health in Black American adolescents; and (b) What are the risk and protective factors that contribute to mental health outcomes among Black American …
Evaluative criteria in practice: Findings from an analysis of evaluations published in Evaluation and Program Planning
Identifying Risk and Protective Factors in Research on Mental Health and Black American Adolescents: 1990 Through 2022
This literature review synthesizes research on Black American adolescents' mental health published between 1990 and 2022 to identify prominent risk factors and highlight key protective factors for their mental health. Two research questions guided this review: (a) How did researchers examine mental health in Black American adolescents; and (b) What are the risk and protective factors that contribute to mental health outcomes among Black American …
It Has to Be the Common Thread: Weaving Attention to Racial Equity and Justice Across Lines of Inquiry and Evaluative Criteria
Evaluators must attend to the destructive forces of racialization and racism to contribute to social transformation. Thus, evaluators are called to center culture, context, equity, and social justice during each step of the evaluation process. Here, we focus on the step(s) in which evaluators define program quality and specify evaluative lines of inquiry. We interviewed 29 social justice-oriented evaluators to examine lines of inquiry for program…
Evaluative criteria in practice: Findings from an analysis of evaluations published in Evaluation and Program Planning
Reporting Lines of Inquiry: Documenting Evaluations and Making Values Explicit
The Program Evaluation Standards call for “rigorous documentation of evaluations” and emphasize evaluators’ responsibility to make explicit the key values that shape evaluations. Clear, complete, values-attentive evaluation reporting is necessary so constituents can understand, learn from, critique, improve, and take action based on evaluations. Yet, scholars have documented gaps in reporting that can limit understanding of evaluations. In this p…
It Has to Be the Common Thread: Weaving Attention to Racial Equity and Justice Across Lines of Inquiry and Evaluative Criteria
Evaluators must attend to the destructive forces of racialization and racism to contribute to social transformation. Thus, evaluators are called to center culture, context, equity, and social justice during each step of the evaluation process. Here, we focus on the step(s) in which evaluators define program quality and specify evaluative lines of inquiry. We interviewed 29 social justice-oriented evaluators to examine lines of inquiry for program…
Identifying Risk and Protective Factors in Research on Mental Health and Black American Adolescents: 1990 Through 2022
This literature review synthesizes research on Black American adolescents' mental health published between 1990 and 2022 to identify prominent risk factors and highlight key protective factors for their mental health. Two research questions guided this review: (a) How did researchers examine mental health in Black American adolescents; and (b) What are the risk and protective factors that contribute to mental health outcomes among Black American …
Toward Racial Equity: Navigating Diverse Conceptualizations and Perspectives in Social Justice-Oriented Evaluation Practice
The effects of race can manifest in various ways in evaluation contexts, making it critical for evaluators to unpack how race and racism are “complex and destructive forces” for racially minoritized and Indigenous communities. The clarion calls by evaluators on the need for greater attention to issues of race and racism in evaluation underscore the profound urgency to investigate the topic now, given that evaluation can be an important driver in …
Psychology (5 works) · Evaluation and Performance Assessment (4 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Community Health and Development (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Criminology (2 works) · Equity (law (2 works) · Gender Studies (2 works) · Gender Studies (2 works) · Health Policy Implementation Science (2 works)