Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Walter J Sowden

Biographic Data

ID3602673
NAMEWalter J Sowden
GIVEN NAMESWalter J
FAMILY NAMESowden
SIGNATURESOWDEN W J
AFFILIATIONSTripler Army Medical Center
ORCID0000-0001-7329-1222
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS4
TOTAL CITATIONS25
AUTHOR COUNT4
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2016
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2023
H-INDEX2
  • A many-analysts approach to the relation between religiosity and well-being

    Open Access•Suzanne Hoogeveen, Alexandra Sarafoglou et al.•ARTICLE•Religion Brain & Behavior•2023

    The relation between religiosity and well-being is one of the most researched topics in the psychology of religion, yet the directionality and robustness of the effect remains debated. Here, we adopted a many-analysts approach to assess the robustness of this relation based on a new cross-cultural dataset (N=10,535 participants from 24 countries). We recruited 120 analysis teams to investigate (1) whether religious people self-report higher well-…

  • How moral adaptability relates to communication and friendship with morally dissimilar others

    Open Access•Nicholas L Matthews, Joseph B Bayer et al.•ARTICLE•Communication Monographs•2023•References: 11

    Moral differences hinder communication and relationship formation. However, perceptions and reactions to moral dissimilarity varies. Accordingly, we explored how moral adaptiveness (a flexible application of morality) relates to the intent to communicate with and befriend morally dissimilar others by focusing on moral relativism (believing that morals are subjective) and moral tolerance (believing that one should not condemn/change dissimilar oth…

  • Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests

    Justin F Landy, Miaolei Jia et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•2020•Cited by: 9•References: 14

    To what extent are research results influenced by subjective decisions that scientists make as they design studies? Fifteen research teams independently designed studies to answer five original research questions related to moral judgments, negotiations, and implicit cognition. Participants from 2 separate large samples (total N > 15,000) were then randomly assigned to complete 1 version of each study. Effect sizes varied dramatically across diff…

  • The pipeline project

    Open Access•Martin Schweinsberg, Nikhil Madan et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2016•Cited by: 16•References: 68

    This crowdsourced project introduces a collaborative approach to improving the reproducibility of scientific research, in which findings are replicated in qualified independent laboratories before (rather than after) they are published. Our goal is to establish a non-adversarial replication process with highly informative final results. To illustrate the Pre-Publication Independent Replication (PPIR) approach, 25 research groups conducted replica…

  • The pipeline project

    Open Access•Martin Schweinsberg, Nikhil Madan et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2016•Cited by: 16•References: 68

    This crowdsourced project introduces a collaborative approach to improving the reproducibility of scientific research, in which findings are replicated in qualified independent laboratories before (rather than after) they are published. Our goal is to establish a non-adversarial replication process with highly informative final results. To illustrate the Pre-Publication Independent Replication (PPIR) approach, 25 research groups conducted replica…

  • Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests

    Justin F Landy, Miaolei Jia et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•2020•Cited by: 9•References: 14

    To what extent are research results influenced by subjective decisions that scientists make as they design studies? Fifteen research teams independently designed studies to answer five original research questions related to moral judgments, negotiations, and implicit cognition. Participants from 2 separate large samples (total N > 15,000) were then randomly assigned to complete 1 version of each study. Effect sizes varied dramatically across diff…

  • The pipeline project

    Open Access•Martin Schweinsberg, Nikhil Madan et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2016•Cited by: 16•References: 68

    This crowdsourced project introduces a collaborative approach to improving the reproducibility of scientific research, in which findings are replicated in qualified independent laboratories before (rather than after) they are published. Our goal is to establish a non-adversarial replication process with highly informative final results. To illustrate the Pre-Publication Independent Replication (PPIR) approach, 25 research groups conducted replica…

  • Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests

    Justin F Landy, Miaolei Jia et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•2020•Cited by: 9•References: 14

    To what extent are research results influenced by subjective decisions that scientists make as they design studies? Fifteen research teams independently designed studies to answer five original research questions related to moral judgments, negotiations, and implicit cognition. Participants from 2 separate large samples (total N > 15,000) were then randomly assigned to complete 1 version of each study. Effect sizes varied dramatically across diff…

  • A many-analysts approach to the relation between religiosity and well-being

    Open Access•Suzanne Hoogeveen, Alexandra Sarafoglou et al.•ARTICLE•Religion Brain & Behavior•2023

    The relation between religiosity and well-being is one of the most researched topics in the psychology of religion, yet the directionality and robustness of the effect remains debated. Here, we adopted a many-analysts approach to assess the robustness of this relation based on a new cross-cultural dataset (N=10,535 participants from 24 countries). We recruited 120 analysis teams to investigate (1) whether religious people self-report higher well-…

  • How moral adaptability relates to communication and friendship with morally dissimilar others

    Open Access•Nicholas L Matthews, Joseph B Bayer et al.•ARTICLE•Communication Monographs•2023•References: 11

    Moral differences hinder communication and relationship formation. However, perceptions and reactions to moral dissimilarity varies. Accordingly, we explored how moral adaptiveness (a flexible application of morality) relates to the intent to communicate with and befriend morally dissimilar others by focusing on moral relativism (believing that morals are subjective) and moral tolerance (believing that one should not condemn/change dissimilar oth…

Psychology (4 works) · Social Psychology (4 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 works) · Social Psychology (3 works) · Applied Psychology (2 works) · Applied Psychology (2 works) · Mathematics (2 works) · Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 works) · Statistics (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae