John A Stewart
Biographic Data
| ID | 3632054 |
|---|---|
| NAME | John A Stewart |
| GIVEN NAMES | John A |
| FAMILY NAME | Stewart |
| SIGNATURE | STEWART J A |
| AFFILIATIONS | Institute of Chartered Accountants of India |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-9035-9812 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 17 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 123 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 17 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1955 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2012 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
Monitoring State Fulfillment of Economic and Social Rights Obligations in the United States
Shorter notice. In the Name of Liberalism: Illiberal Social Policy in the United States and Britain. D King
Journal Article Shorter notice. In the Name of Liberalism: Illiberal Social Policy in the United States and Britain. D King Get access J Stewart J Stewart Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The English Historical Review, Volume 115, Issue 462, June 2000, Pages 779–780, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/115.462.779 Published: 01 June 2000
Drifting Continents and Colliding Paradigms: Perspectives on the Geoscience Revolution
Drifting Continents and Colliding Paradigms: Perspectives on the Geoscience Revolution
Backdoor to Eugenics
Drifting or Colliding Interests? A Reply to Laudan with Some New Results
7. Stewart did attempt to use data from the Bibliography and Index of Geology, Exclusive of North America, but, since it did not begin publication until 1934, its use was limited. 8. Stewart has assembled a list of ninety-five scientists, not all of them 'geoscientists' and not all of them American, who published one (or occasionally more) papers on drift in his chosen period. 9. Stewart argues that his interpretation rests on rejecting Bloor's '…
Drifting Continents and Colliding Interests: A Quantitative Application of the Interests Perspective
A quantitative analysis of geoscientists' published opinions on continental drift theory between 1907 and 1950 indicates that the more prominent scientists resisted this revolutionary theory. Was this resistance based on the greater knowledge of these productive geoscientists, or were they protecting their reputations? The latter interpretation gains plausibility because the current acceptance of plate tectonics implies that the previous evidence…
Achievement and Ascriptive Processes in the Recognition of Scientific Articles
Most studies in the sociology of science have used individuals or organizations as their units of analysis. Using scientific articles provides an alternative method for studying the distribution of recognition or influence in science. The study of citations to articles not only permits a better examination of the functionalist distinction between achievement and ascriptive processes (relying on universalistic and Matthew effect criteria, respecti…
Lotka's Law: A Problem in Its Interpretation and Application
Reply to Faia
Productivity Differences Among Scientists: Evidence for Accumulative Advantage
The highly skewed distributions of productivity among scientists can be partly explained by a process of accumulative advantage. Because offeedback through recognition and resources, highly productive scientists maintain or increase their productivity, while scientists who produce very little produce even less later on. A major implication of accumulative advantage is that the distribution of productivity becomes increasingly unequal as a cohort …
Evaluation of serological techniques for titration of rubella antibody
Evaluation of serological techniques for titration of rubella antibody. K L Herrmann, P E Halonen, J A Stewart, H L Casey, J M Ryan, A D Hall, and K E CaswellCopyRight https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.59.2.297 Published Online: August 29, 2011
SCOTTISH Economic Society: B alance S heet as at 31 st D ecember , 1960
Scottish Economic Society: I ncome and E xpenditure A ccount : Year ended 31st December. 1960
Scottish Economic Society
Current Topics
Scottish Economic Society Income and Expenditure Account: Period from Date of Formation to 31st December 1954
Productivity Differences Among Scientists: Evidence for Accumulative Advantage
The highly skewed distributions of productivity among scientists can be partly explained by a process of accumulative advantage. Because offeedback through recognition and resources, highly productive scientists maintain or increase their productivity, while scientists who produce very little produce even less later on. A major implication of accumulative advantage is that the distribution of productivity becomes increasingly unequal as a cohort …
Achievement and Ascriptive Processes in the Recognition of Scientific Articles
Most studies in the sociology of science have used individuals or organizations as their units of analysis. Using scientific articles provides an alternative method for studying the distribution of recognition or influence in science. The study of citations to articles not only permits a better examination of the functionalist distinction between achievement and ascriptive processes (relying on universalistic and Matthew effect criteria, respecti…
Drifting Continents and Colliding Interests: A Quantitative Application of the Interests Perspective
A quantitative analysis of geoscientists' published opinions on continental drift theory between 1907 and 1950 indicates that the more prominent scientists resisted this revolutionary theory. Was this resistance based on the greater knowledge of these productive geoscientists, or were they protecting their reputations? The latter interpretation gains plausibility because the current acceptance of plate tectonics implies that the previous evidence…
Lotka's Law: A Problem in Its Interpretation and Application
Backdoor to Eugenics
Reply to Faia
Scottish Economic Society Income and Expenditure Account: Period from Date of Formation to 31st December 1954
Scottish Economic Society
Current Topics
SCOTTISH Economic Society: B alance S heet as at 31 st D ecember , 1960
Scottish Economic Society: I ncome and E xpenditure A ccount : Year ended 31st December. 1960
Evaluation of serological techniques for titration of rubella antibody
Evaluation of serological techniques for titration of rubella antibody. K L Herrmann, P E Halonen, J A Stewart, H L Casey, J M Ryan, A D Hall, and K E CaswellCopyRight https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.59.2.297 Published Online: August 29, 2011
Productivity Differences Among Scientists: Evidence for Accumulative Advantage
The highly skewed distributions of productivity among scientists can be partly explained by a process of accumulative advantage. Because offeedback through recognition and resources, highly productive scientists maintain or increase their productivity, while scientists who produce very little produce even less later on. A major implication of accumulative advantage is that the distribution of productivity becomes increasingly unequal as a cohort …
Reply to Faia
Lotka's Law: A Problem in Its Interpretation and Application
Achievement and Ascriptive Processes in the Recognition of Scientific Articles
Most studies in the sociology of science have used individuals or organizations as their units of analysis. Using scientific articles provides an alternative method for studying the distribution of recognition or influence in science. The study of citations to articles not only permits a better examination of the functionalist distinction between achievement and ascriptive processes (relying on universalistic and Matthew effect criteria, respecti…
Drifting Continents and Colliding Interests: A Quantitative Application of the Interests Perspective
A quantitative analysis of geoscientists' published opinions on continental drift theory between 1907 and 1950 indicates that the more prominent scientists resisted this revolutionary theory. Was this resistance based on the greater knowledge of these productive geoscientists, or were they protecting their reputations? The latter interpretation gains plausibility because the current acceptance of plate tectonics implies that the previous evidence…
Drifting or Colliding Interests? A Reply to Laudan with Some New Results
7. Stewart did attempt to use data from the Bibliography and Index of Geology, Exclusive of North America, but, since it did not begin publication until 1934, its use was limited. 8. Stewart has assembled a list of ninety-five scientists, not all of them 'geoscientists' and not all of them American, who published one (or occasionally more) papers on drift in his chosen period. 9. Stewart argues that his interpretation rests on rejecting Bloor's '…
Drifting Continents and Colliding Paradigms: Perspectives on the Geoscience Revolution
Backdoor to Eugenics
Drifting Continents and Colliding Paradigms: Perspectives on the Geoscience Revolution
Shorter notice. In the Name of Liberalism: Illiberal Social Policy in the United States and Britain. D King
Journal Article Shorter notice. In the Name of Liberalism: Illiberal Social Policy in the United States and Britain. D King Get access J Stewart J Stewart Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The English Historical Review, Volume 115, Issue 462, June 2000, Pages 779–780, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/115.462.779 Published: 01 June 2000
Monitoring State Fulfillment of Economic and Social Rights Obligations in the United States
Political science (10 works) · Law (9 works) · Sociology (9 works) · Computer Science (8 works) · Law (8 works) · Economics (7 works) · Politics (7 works) · Audit (5 works) · Citation (5 works) · Local Government Finance and Decentralization (5 works)