Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

David G Lawrence

Biographic Data

ID364910
NAMEDavid G Lawrence
GIVEN NAMESDavid G
FAMILY NAMELawrence
SIGNATURELAWRENCE D G
AFFILIATIONSFordham University
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS11
TOTAL CITATIONS44
AUTHOR COUNT11
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1976
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2000
H-INDEX3
  • Change and Continuity in the 1996 and 1998 Elections . Paul R. Abramson , John H. Aldrich , David W. Rohde

    David G Lawrence•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•2000

  • Ideological Extremity, Issue Distance, and Voter Defection

    David G Lawrence•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•1994

  • Ideological Extremity, Issue Distance, and Voter Defection

    Open Access•David G Lawrence•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•1994•Cited by: 2•References: 35

    The bulk of the literature rejects the argument that Democratic failure in presidential elections between 1968 and 1988 had an ideological basis. Analysis of the interplay of respondents' own issue positions with their perceptions of the parties/candidates suggests a different and rather complex picture. Between 1968 and 1980, the partisan/ideological cores of the two parties-liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans- behave quite differentl…

  • The Collapse of the Democratic Majority: Economics and Vote Choice since 1952

    Open Access•David G Lawrence•ARTICLE•The Western Political Quarterly•1991•Cited by: 3•References: 20

  • Puzzles and Confusions: Political Realignment in the 1980s

    Open Access•David G Lawrence, Richard Fleisher•ARTICLE•Political Science Quarterly•1987•Cited by: 5

    Few concepts in the social science literature have aroused as much controversy and discussion in recent years as party and electoral realignment. The term conjures up images of sharp dramatic changes in the nature of political conflict, upsurge in mass political involvement and participation, sharp alteration in the political agenda and the nature of political outputs. Realignment has attracted attention because it was thought to be topical as we…

  • Stephen M. David

    David G Lawrence•ARTICLE•PS Political Science & Politics•1985

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button

  • Constituency Focus and Urban Policy Making: Local Politics in London

    Open Access•Paul P Kantor, David G Lawrence•ARTICLE•Political Studies•1981•References: 4

    The significance of constituency forces in policy making has been frequently suggested, but the role of psychological constituency orientations in legislative politics has rarely been explored. We explore the structure and impact of such internalized norms in a survey of 114 councillors in three Greater London boroughs. The research suggests that councillors do not usually choose between representing smaller or larger territorial units; rather, c…

  • Towards an Attitudinal Theory of Political Participation

    David G Lawrence•ARTICLE•Polity•1981•Cited by: 2

  • Candidate Orientation, Vote Choice, & the Quality of the American Electorate

    David G Lawrence•ARTICLE•Polity•1978•Cited by: 2

    Scholarly explanations of voting behavior have largely ignored candidate orientation. Analyses which do take voters' concerns into account generally fail to separate these sufficiently from evaluations based on party or issues or content themselves with references to a broad range of general and irrelevant personality traits. In emphasizing the importance of candidate orientation in voting, David Lawrence here proposes a definition limiting candi…

  • Generational Change in American Politics. Paul R. Abramson

    David G Lawrence•ARTICLE•American Journal of Sociology•1976

  • Procedural Norms and Tolerance: A Reassessment

    Open Access•David G Lawrence•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•1976•Cited by: 30•References: 10

    This paper is both a criticism and extension of a small existing literature on procedural norms and tolerance which has been influential in several interpretations of American politics but which suffers from both conceptual and empirical shortcomings.The existing literature concludes that tolerance is not widely distributed in the American mass public: unpopular groups such as Communists or atheists would not be allowed political activity by most…

  • Procedural Norms and Tolerance: A Reassessment

    Open Access•David G Lawrence•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•1976•Cited by: 30•References: 10

    This paper is both a criticism and extension of a small existing literature on procedural norms and tolerance which has been influential in several interpretations of American politics but which suffers from both conceptual and empirical shortcomings.The existing literature concludes that tolerance is not widely distributed in the American mass public: unpopular groups such as Communists or atheists would not be allowed political activity by most…

  • Puzzles and Confusions: Political Realignment in the 1980s

    Open Access•David G Lawrence, Richard Fleisher•ARTICLE•Political Science Quarterly•1987•Cited by: 5

    Few concepts in the social science literature have aroused as much controversy and discussion in recent years as party and electoral realignment. The term conjures up images of sharp dramatic changes in the nature of political conflict, upsurge in mass political involvement and participation, sharp alteration in the political agenda and the nature of political outputs. Realignment has attracted attention because it was thought to be topical as we…

  • The Collapse of the Democratic Majority: Economics and Vote Choice since 1952

    Open Access•David G Lawrence•ARTICLE•The Western Political Quarterly•1991•Cited by: 3•References: 20

  • Ideological Extremity, Issue Distance, and Voter Defection

    Open Access•David G Lawrence•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•1994•Cited by: 2•References: 35

    The bulk of the literature rejects the argument that Democratic failure in presidential elections between 1968 and 1988 had an ideological basis. Analysis of the interplay of respondents' own issue positions with their perceptions of the parties/candidates suggests a different and rather complex picture. Between 1968 and 1980, the partisan/ideological cores of the two parties-liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans- behave quite differentl…

  • Towards an Attitudinal Theory of Political Participation

    David G Lawrence•ARTICLE•Polity•1981•Cited by: 2

  • Candidate Orientation, Vote Choice, & the Quality of the American Electorate

    David G Lawrence•ARTICLE•Polity•1978•Cited by: 2

    Scholarly explanations of voting behavior have largely ignored candidate orientation. Analyses which do take voters' concerns into account generally fail to separate these sufficiently from evaluations based on party or issues or content themselves with references to a broad range of general and irrelevant personality traits. In emphasizing the importance of candidate orientation in voting, David Lawrence here proposes a definition limiting candi…

  • Generational Change in American Politics. Paul R. Abramson

    David G Lawrence•ARTICLE•American Journal of Sociology•1976

  • Procedural Norms and Tolerance: A Reassessment

    Open Access•David G Lawrence•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•1976•Cited by: 30•References: 10

    This paper is both a criticism and extension of a small existing literature on procedural norms and tolerance which has been influential in several interpretations of American politics but which suffers from both conceptual and empirical shortcomings.The existing literature concludes that tolerance is not widely distributed in the American mass public: unpopular groups such as Communists or atheists would not be allowed political activity by most…

  • Candidate Orientation, Vote Choice, & the Quality of the American Electorate

    David G Lawrence•ARTICLE•Polity•1978•Cited by: 2

    Scholarly explanations of voting behavior have largely ignored candidate orientation. Analyses which do take voters' concerns into account generally fail to separate these sufficiently from evaluations based on party or issues or content themselves with references to a broad range of general and irrelevant personality traits. In emphasizing the importance of candidate orientation in voting, David Lawrence here proposes a definition limiting candi…

  • Constituency Focus and Urban Policy Making: Local Politics in London

    Open Access•Paul P Kantor, David G Lawrence•ARTICLE•Political Studies•1981•References: 4

    The significance of constituency forces in policy making has been frequently suggested, but the role of psychological constituency orientations in legislative politics has rarely been explored. We explore the structure and impact of such internalized norms in a survey of 114 councillors in three Greater London boroughs. The research suggests that councillors do not usually choose between representing smaller or larger territorial units; rather, c…

  • Towards an Attitudinal Theory of Political Participation

    David G Lawrence•ARTICLE•Polity•1981•Cited by: 2

  • Stephen M. David

    David G Lawrence•ARTICLE•PS Political Science & Politics•1985

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button

  • Puzzles and Confusions: Political Realignment in the 1980s

    Open Access•David G Lawrence, Richard Fleisher•ARTICLE•Political Science Quarterly•1987•Cited by: 5

    Few concepts in the social science literature have aroused as much controversy and discussion in recent years as party and electoral realignment. The term conjures up images of sharp dramatic changes in the nature of political conflict, upsurge in mass political involvement and participation, sharp alteration in the political agenda and the nature of political outputs. Realignment has attracted attention because it was thought to be topical as we…

  • The Collapse of the Democratic Majority: Economics and Vote Choice since 1952

    Open Access•David G Lawrence•ARTICLE•The Western Political Quarterly•1991•Cited by: 3•References: 20

  • Ideological Extremity, Issue Distance, and Voter Defection

    David G Lawrence•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•1994

  • Ideological Extremity, Issue Distance, and Voter Defection

    Open Access•David G Lawrence•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•1994•Cited by: 2•References: 35

    The bulk of the literature rejects the argument that Democratic failure in presidential elections between 1968 and 1988 had an ideological basis. Analysis of the interplay of respondents' own issue positions with their perceptions of the parties/candidates suggests a different and rather complex picture. Between 1968 and 1980, the partisan/ideological cores of the two parties-liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans- behave quite differentl…

  • Change and Continuity in the 1996 and 1998 Elections . Paul R. Abramson , John H. Aldrich , David W. Rohde

    David G Lawrence•ARTICLE•The Journal of Politics•2000

Law (10 works) · Political science (10 works) · Politics (10 works) · Electoral Systems and Political Participation (9 works) · Sociology (9 works) · Law (6 works) · Law and economics (5 works) · Political economy (5 works) · Computer Science (4 works) · Economics (4 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae