Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Hung‐wei Lee

Biographic Data

ID3658724
NAMEHung‐wei Lee
GIVEN NAMESHung‐wei
FAMILY NAMELee
SIGNATURELEE H W
AFFILIATIONSDepartment of Applied Psychology Hsuan Chuang University Hsinchu City Taiwan
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS1
TOTAL CITATIONS2
AUTHOR COUNT1
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2016
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2016
H-INDEX1
  • Do incompatible arguments cause extensive processing in the evaluation of arguments? The role of congruence between argument compatibility and argument quality

    Open Access•Cheng‐hong Liu, H J Lee et al.•ARTICLE•British Journal of Psychology•2016•Cited by: 2•References: 42

    Previous studies have demonstrated that arguments incompatible with prior beliefs are subjected to more extensive refutational processing, scrutinized longer, and judged to be weaker than arguments compatible with prior beliefs. However, this study suggests whether extensive processing is implemented when evaluating arguments is not decided by argument compatibility, but by congruence between two evaluating tendencies elicited by both argument co…

  • Do incompatible arguments cause extensive processing in the evaluation of arguments? The role of congruence between argument compatibility and argument quality

    Open Access•Cheng‐hong Liu, H J Lee et al.•ARTICLE•British Journal of Psychology•2016•Cited by: 2•References: 42

    Previous studies have demonstrated that arguments incompatible with prior beliefs are subjected to more extensive refutational processing, scrutinized longer, and judged to be weaker than arguments compatible with prior beliefs. However, this study suggests whether extensive processing is implemented when evaluating arguments is not decided by argument compatibility, but by congruence between two evaluating tendencies elicited by both argument co…

  • Do incompatible arguments cause extensive processing in the evaluation of arguments? The role of congruence between argument compatibility and argument quality

    Open Access•Cheng‐hong Liu, H J Lee et al.•ARTICLE•British Journal of Psychology•2016•Cited by: 2•References: 42

    Previous studies have demonstrated that arguments incompatible with prior beliefs are subjected to more extensive refutational processing, scrutinized longer, and judged to be weaker than arguments compatible with prior beliefs. However, this study suggests whether extensive processing is implemented when evaluating arguments is not decided by argument compatibility, but by congruence between two evaluating tendencies elicited by both argument co…

Argument (complex analysis) (1 works) · Compatibility (geochemistry) (1 works) · Congruence (geometry) (1 works) · Epistemology (1 works) · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (1 works) · Philosophy (1 works) · Psychology (1 works) · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 works) · Social and Intergroup Psychology (1 works) · Social Psychology (1 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae