Jack M Barbalet
Biographic Data
| ID | 3659667 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Jack M Barbalet |
| GIVEN NAMES | Jack M |
| FAMILY NAME | Barbalet |
| SIGNATURE | BARBALET J M |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 5 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1980 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1991 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Power and Group Processes
Theoretical discussions of power assume that power alters the behavior but not the structure of participants. A significant consequence of subordination to power, however, is that the composition, constitution and structure of agents are transformed. After identifying the fallacy of the unitary subject it is argued, and demonstrated in a case study, that power involves a disunity of the subject. These points are then integrated into a discussion …
Principles of Stratification in Max Weber
Jack M. Barbalet, Principles of Stratification in Max Weber: An Interpretation and Critique, The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 31, No. 3, Special Issue. Aspects of Weberian Scholarship (Sep., 1980), pp. 401-418
Principles of Stratification in Max Weber
Jack M. Barbalet, Principles of Stratification in Max Weber: An Interpretation and Critique, The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 31, No. 3, Special Issue. Aspects of Weberian Scholarship (Sep., 1980), pp. 401-418
Power and Group Processes
Theoretical discussions of power assume that power alters the behavior but not the structure of participants. A significant consequence of subordination to power, however, is that the composition, constitution and structure of agents are transformed. After identifying the fallacy of the unitary subject it is argued, and demonstrated in a case study, that power involves a disunity of the subject. These points are then integrated into a discussion …
Principles of Stratification in Max Weber
Jack M. Barbalet, Principles of Stratification in Max Weber: An Interpretation and Critique, The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 31, No. 3, Special Issue. Aspects of Weberian Scholarship (Sep., 1980), pp. 401-418
Power and Group Processes
Theoretical discussions of power assume that power alters the behavior but not the structure of participants. A significant consequence of subordination to power, however, is that the composition, constitution and structure of agents are transformed. After identifying the fallacy of the unitary subject it is argued, and demonstrated in a case study, that power involves a disunity of the subject. These points are then integrated into a discussion …
Critical Theory and Philosophy (2 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Linguistics (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Computer Science (1 work) · Constitution (1 work) · Fallacy (1 work) · Interpretation (philosophy (1 work) · Law (1 work)