Steven Knapp
Biographic Data
| ID | 3681661 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Steven Knapp |
| GIVEN NAMES | Steven |
| FAMILY NAME | Knapp |
| SIGNATURE | KNAPP S |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of California, Berkeley |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 10 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 71 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 10 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1982 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1994 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
Reply to John Searle
OHN SEARLE'S CRITICISMS of our account of interpretation all have to do with the distinction he draws between sentence meaning and speaker's or author's meaning-the distinction, that is, between the meaning a sequence of marks or noises can be said to have when treated as a token of a sentence type in a given language, and the meaning that same sequence of marks or noises acquires when someone intentionally produces it. We have argued that only t…
Milton among the Philosophers
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Reply to George Wilson
Collective Memory and the Actual Past
Research Article| April 01 1989 Collective Memory and the Actual Past Steven Knapp Steven Knapp Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Representations (1989) 26: 123–149. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928526 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation…
Personification and the Sublime
Against Theory 2
A Reply to Richard Rorty
The Sublime, Self-Reference, and Wordsworth's Resolution and Independence
As a number of scholars have persuaded us, it is hard and a little dangerous to generalize about the sublime.* Hard, because the sublime is at once a diverse collection of aesthetic theories, a genre of literary performances, and a thematic paradigm that recurs, with a compulsive and often comic regularity, in post-Enlightenment writings of the highest and the lowest forms. Dangerous, because the attempt to generalize can involve the same combina…
A Reply to Our Critics
Against Theory
Against Theory
Collective Memory and the Actual Past
Research Article| April 01 1989 Collective Memory and the Actual Past Steven Knapp Steven Knapp Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Representations (1989) 26: 123–149. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928526 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation…
Against Theory 2
A Reply to Our Critics
Against Theory
A Reply to Our Critics
The Sublime, Self-Reference, and Wordsworth's Resolution and Independence
As a number of scholars have persuaded us, it is hard and a little dangerous to generalize about the sublime.* Hard, because the sublime is at once a diverse collection of aesthetic theories, a genre of literary performances, and a thematic paradigm that recurs, with a compulsive and often comic regularity, in post-Enlightenment writings of the highest and the lowest forms. Dangerous, because the attempt to generalize can involve the same combina…
A Reply to Richard Rorty
Personification and the Sublime
Against Theory 2
Collective Memory and the Actual Past
Research Article| April 01 1989 Collective Memory and the Actual Past Steven Knapp Steven Knapp Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Representations (1989) 26: 123–149. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928526 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation…
Reply to George Wilson
Milton among the Philosophers
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Reply to John Searle
OHN SEARLE'S CRITICISMS of our account of interpretation all have to do with the distinction he draws between sentence meaning and speaker's or author's meaning-the distinction, that is, between the meaning a sequence of marks or noises can be said to have when treated as a token of a sentence type in a given language, and the meaning that same sequence of marks or noises acquires when someone intentionally produces it. We have argued that only t…
Art (7 works) · Philosophy (7 works) · Philosophy (6 works) · Art history (5 works) · Epistemology (5 works) · Literature (4 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · History (3 works) · Meaning (existential (3 works) · Theology (3 works)