Paul Hoyningen-Huene
Biographic Data
| ID | 3683690 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Paul Hoyningen-Huene |
| GIVEN NAMES | Paul |
| FAMILY NAME | Hoyningen-Huene |
| SIGNATURE | HOYNINGEN-HUENE P |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 9 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 55 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 9 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1987 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 5 |
Kommentar zu Jürgen Mittelstraß’ „Historische Randbemerkungen zum Natur- und Weltbildbegriff“
Commentary on Jürgen Mittelstraß’ ‘Historical notes on the concept of nature and world view’. The paper critically deals with two topics of Mittelstraß’ paper. First, I claim that Mittelstraß’ constructive motive that is developed in three steps of increasing radicality is in need of very heterogeneous supportive arguments. In the first step, a fully naturalistic concept of nature is criticized because of the effects of human physical interaction…
Wozu Wissenschaftsphilosophie
On naturalizing Kuhn’s essential tension
More letters by Paul Feyerabend to Thomas S. Kuhn on Proto-Structure
Feyerabend's Early Philosophy
On incommensurability
Two letters of Paul Feyerabend to Thomas S. Kühn on a draft of the structure of scientific revolutions
Kuhn's conception of incommensurability
Context of discovery and context of justification
Two letters of Paul Feyerabend to Thomas S. Kühn on a draft of the structure of scientific revolutions
Context of discovery and context of justification
Kuhn's conception of incommensurability
More letters by Paul Feyerabend to Thomas S. Kuhn on Proto-Structure
On incommensurability
On naturalizing Kuhn’s essential tension
Feyerabend's Early Philosophy
Context of discovery and context of justification
Kuhn's conception of incommensurability
Two letters of Paul Feyerabend to Thomas S. Kühn on a draft of the structure of scientific revolutions
On incommensurability
Feyerabend's Early Philosophy
More letters by Paul Feyerabend to Thomas S. Kuhn on Proto-Structure
On naturalizing Kuhn’s essential tension
Wozu Wissenschaftsphilosophie
Kommentar zu Jürgen Mittelstraß’ „Historische Randbemerkungen zum Natur- und Weltbildbegriff“
Commentary on Jürgen Mittelstraß’ ‘Historical notes on the concept of nature and world view’. The paper critically deals with two topics of Mittelstraß’ paper. First, I claim that Mittelstraß’ constructive motive that is developed in three steps of increasing radicality is in need of very heterogeneous supportive arguments. In the first step, a fully naturalistic concept of nature is criticized because of the effects of human physical interaction…
Philosophy (6 works) · Epistemology (5 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Philosophy and History of Science (4 works) · Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Philosophy, Science, and History (2 works) · Physics (2 works) · Alkaline earth metal (1 work)