Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Ralph H Johnson

Dados Biográficos

ID3687429
NOMERalph H Johnson
PRENOMESRalph H
SOBRENOMEJohnson
ASSINATURAJOHNSON R H
AFILIAÇÕESUniversity of Windsor
ORCID0000-0001-5792-945X
VERIFICADOSim
TOTAL DE OBRAS9
TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES0
TOTAL COMO AUTOR9
TOTAL COMO EDITOR0
PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO1955
ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO2020
ÍNDICE H0
  • Revisitando o Triunvirato lógica/dialética/retórica

    Open Access•Ralph H Johnson•ARTICLE•Revista Eletrônica de Estudos…•2020

    Muitos teóricos da argumentação adotaram a visão de que a argumentação pode ser abordada sob três perspectivas diferentes: a lógica, a dialética e a retórica, às quais denomino Triunvirato. Segundo Wenzel (1990), a base conceitual para esse triunvirato é a distinção entre argumentação como produto, como processo e como procedimento (a Distinção Tripartite). Neste artigo, quero levantar questões sobre a Visão do Triunvirato e a Distinção Tripartit…

  • Manifest Rationality

    Ralph H Johnson•BOOK•Manifest Rationality•2012

    This book works through some of the theoretical issues that have been accumulating in informal logic over the past 20 years. At the same time, it defines a core position in the theory of argument in which those issues can be further explored. The underlying concern that motivates this work is the health of practice of argumentation as an important cultural artifact. A further concern is for logic as a discipline. Argumentative and dialectical in …

  • Reasoning, Argumentation and The Network Problem

    Ralph H Johnson, ProtoSociology Project•ARTICLE•ProtoSociology•1999

  • Massey on fallacy and informal logic

    Open Access•Ralph H Johnson•ARTICLE•Synthese•1989

  • Kierkegaard on philosophy

    Open Access•Ralph H Johnson•ARTICLE•Dialogue•1978•Referências: 1

    At The end of the Concluding Unscientific Postscript , in the Appendix entitled “For an Understanding with the Reader,” Johannes Climacus, the pseudonymous author, renders the following verdict: So then the book is superfluous; let no one therefore take the pains to appeal to it as an authority; for he who thus appeals to it has eo ipso misunderstood it

  • To Will One Thing

    Open Access•Ralph H Johnson•ARTICLE•Studies in Religion/Sciences…•1973

  • Compromise in Medicine

    Open Access•Ralph H Johnson•ARTICLE•Theology•1970

  • Selection of School Counselors

    Open Access•Ralph H Johnson•ARTICLE•Counselor Education and Supervision•1963

  • A Health and Physical Education Program for The Teachers Colleges Of Thailand

    Open Access•Charles D Merrill, Ralph H Johnson•ARTICLE•Journal of Teacher Education•1955

Sem obras proeminentes nesta página.

  • A Health and Physical Education Program for The Teachers Colleges Of Thailand

    Open Access•Charles D Merrill, Ralph H Johnson•ARTICLE•Journal of Teacher Education•1955

  • Selection of School Counselors

    Open Access•Ralph H Johnson•ARTICLE•Counselor Education and Supervision•1963

  • Compromise in Medicine

    Open Access•Ralph H Johnson•ARTICLE•Theology•1970

  • To Will One Thing

    Open Access•Ralph H Johnson•ARTICLE•Studies in Religion/Sciences…•1973

  • Kierkegaard on philosophy

    Open Access•Ralph H Johnson•ARTICLE•Dialogue•1978•Referências: 1

    At The end of the Concluding Unscientific Postscript , in the Appendix entitled “For an Understanding with the Reader,” Johannes Climacus, the pseudonymous author, renders the following verdict: So then the book is superfluous; let no one therefore take the pains to appeal to it as an authority; for he who thus appeals to it has eo ipso misunderstood it

  • Massey on fallacy and informal logic

    Open Access•Ralph H Johnson•ARTICLE•Synthese•1989

  • Reasoning, Argumentation and The Network Problem

    Ralph H Johnson, ProtoSociology Project•ARTICLE•ProtoSociology•1999

  • Manifest Rationality

    Ralph H Johnson•BOOK•Manifest Rationality•2012

    This book works through some of the theoretical issues that have been accumulating in informal logic over the past 20 years. At the same time, it defines a core position in the theory of argument in which those issues can be further explored. The underlying concern that motivates this work is the health of practice of argumentation as an important cultural artifact. A further concern is for logic as a discipline. Argumentative and dialectical in …

  • Revisitando o Triunvirato lógica/dialética/retórica

    Open Access•Ralph H Johnson•ARTICLE•Revista Eletrônica de Estudos…•2020

    Muitos teóricos da argumentação adotaram a visão de que a argumentação pode ser abordada sob três perspectivas diferentes: a lógica, a dialética e a retórica, às quais denomino Triunvirato. Segundo Wenzel (1990), a base conceitual para esse triunvirato é a distinção entre argumentação como produto, como processo e como procedimento (a Distinção Tripartite). Neste artigo, quero levantar questões sobre a Visão do Triunvirato e a Distinção Tripartit…

Philosophy (7 obras) · Epistemology (4 obras) · Psychology (4 obras) · Computer Science (3 obras) · Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence (2 obras) · Law (2 obras) · Political science (2 obras) · Sociology (2 obras) · Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (2 obras) · Appeal (1 obras)

Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae