Sal Restivo
Biographic Data
| ID | 3692484 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Sal Restivo |
| GIVEN NAMES | Sal |
| FAMILY NAME | Restivo |
| SIGNATURE | RESTIVO S |
| AFFILIATIONS | Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 66 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 109 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 66 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1970 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| H-INDEX | 5 |
The Dawkins Delusion
Alister McGrath, a professor of historical theology at Oxford University, published The Dawkins DELUSION? in 2007 with his wife Joanna C. McGrath, a lecturer on psychology and spirituality at Ripon College. Alister McGrath is one of those psychological and sociological curiosities who traded atheism for Christianity. He now views Dawkins’ atheism as a fundamentalist ideology. Having himself earned a PhD in molecular biophysics, he inhabits the “s…
The Science Turn and Sociology
In order to grasp what the author brings to the New Atheist/theist debates, it is necessary to achieve some understanding of the very ideas of science and sociology. Common sense and professional ideas of science and sociology are not always or at all consonant with what we know about these fields based on empirical research; second, without an accurate understanding of science and sociology, we will miss the fatal flaws of the New Atheism and of…
Hans Küng
Why do smart, educated people believe in God in the wake of the evidence against the existence of God? Hans Küng’s terrifyingly brilliant command of knowledge across the disciplines is on full display in Does God Exist? ( 1980 ). This book offers up a narrative proof for the existence of God. Why does someone who seems to know “everything” and has a powerfully critical imagination and travels across time, space, history, and culture from Plato to…
Case Study
Lennox, unlike Turek and many other apologists involved in the debate with the New Atheists, has impeccable scientific credentials. His name is attached to an alphabet soup of letters: MA, PhD, DPhil, and DSc. and he is a professor of mathematics at Oxford University. He adopts a common strategy in these debates, turning the atheists’ criticisms of the theists back toward them, accusing the atheists of the same dogmatic foolishness they attribute…
Beyond New Atheism and Theism: A Sociology of Science, Secularism, and Religiosity
This book addresses the flaws and fallacies in the grounds for atheism and theism – flaws and fallacies that contaminate the arguments of non-believers and believers alike. Focusing on the highly visible debates between the New Atheists – such as Christopher Hitchens, Daniel Dennett, Richard Dawkins, and Sam Harris on the one hand – and their main theist opponents – including Frank Turek, John Lennox, and William Lane Craig on the other – it appr…
Case Study
By virtue of what are at the end of day superficial signs of scholarly achievement, Craig is among the most accomplished philosophers in the realm of Christian apologetics. On the one hand, the grounded scientist, humanist, or skeptic should be embarrassed to pay any attention whatsoever to apologetics, Christian or otherwise. On the other hand, there is a clear and present danger in the seductive potential of such apologetics to persuade the un-…
The New Atheist Worldview 1
This chapter focuses on the thoughts and arguments of the New Atheists, Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris, and the fifth “horseman,” Ayaan Hirsi Ali. In general, they argue that science is worth defending because modifications of technologies are the salvation of our planet. This is really a defense of the “technological fix,” the idea that technology holds the secret to solving all of our problems, technical or so…
The Knowing Society
In this chapter, the author concludes his assessment of New Atheism and theism as incommensurable worldviews that can only be opposed by an alternative worldview. The debates between the New Atheists and theists, like the movie Groundhog Day , repeat themselves debate after debate. Unlike the movie, these debates go on and on without reaching a moral or intellectual resolution. The debate methodology is a way for the debaters to present their vie…
Case Study
In this chapter the author considers an exemplary rebuttal to the New Atheists, Frank Turek’s argument that the “atheists need God to make their case.” Turek introduces the acronym CRIMES to ground his claim that atheists must steal from God to make their arguments. Atheists talk and write about C-ausality, R-eason, I-nformation and I-ntentionality, M-orality, E-vil, and S-cience. None of these features of reality, according to Turek, would exist…
In the Grasp of Secular Reason
Chapter 2 introduces the author as a nonbeliever. Autobiographical remarks might seem out of place in a sociological treatise. The author argues to the contrary that they are not out of place here. The reason is that believers and nonbelievers, theists and atheists occupying soap boxes in the public square do not rehearse their own biographies, which in fact are narratives of how they were socialized. They were not born with their views on religi…
Case Study
Alvin Plantinga argues that a person can assert that they know God exists, without argument, as a basic belief; belief in God is rational and basic without evidence of existence. Who is Alvin Plantinga? Alvin Plantinga (1932–) is by any measure a distinguished fixture in the pantheon of twentieth-century analytic philosophers and Christian philosophers. The author condemns all of the honors attached to Plantinga’s achievements, the very “discipli…
Godless but Good
In this chapter, the author counters the theist claim that morality cannot be justified if there is no God. Sociologist of religion Phil Zuckerman has demonstrated that societies without God not only are possible but are a reality (e.g., Denmark and Sweden). Atheist and secular philosophers argue that (1) religion is at war with rationality, (2) religion veils us from a reality that poses formidable challenges (such as death without the promise o…
Religion and God in Sociological Perspective
This chapter sketches a paradigm for the sociology of religion and the gods. Religious beliefs and institutions were an important concern of the nineteenth-century social thinkers who fashioned the sociological perspective. Among the leading contributors to the sociology of religion in that century were William Robertson Smith, Ludwig Feuerbach, Louis Wallis, Karl Kautsky, Max Weber, Karl Marx, and, most importantly, Emile Durkheim. These thinker…
Genesis
In this chapter, the author introduces and defines the scientific cogito, compares it to the theological cogito, and reviews the history of the very idea of atheism. The scientific cogito defines science as presumptive, corrigible, fallible, and a collective historical process that establishes facts of the matter over time and always colored in skepticism. Faith and blind faith have no role in this process. The theological cogito, which seeks a r…
Afterword
From the moment that authors from different parts of the world began to question the absence of sociocultural bases in the formation of mathematical knowledge, inside and outside the academic universe, a fertile field was opened to face truths that had long been ignored in discourses about the nature of mathematics. This problem was addressed directly and creatively by the Brazilian educator and mathematician Ubiratan D'Ambrosio in 1977. In a tal…
Einstein's Brain: Genius, Culture, and Social Networks
The Age of the Social: The Discovery of Society and the Ascendance of a New Episteme
The concept of society sui generis – society as a level of reality which could be studied scientifically – crystallized in the middle of the nineteenth century in Europe, with the work of Durkheim, Marx and Weber and today, more than at any other period in history, the idea of the social has gained a foothold in philosophy, biology, and neuroscience. However, this idea has emerged into prominence not through the historical or contemporary efforts…
Red, Black, and Objective: Science, Sociology, and Anarchism
Drawing on the empirical findings generated by researchers in science studies, and adopting Kropotkin's concept of anarchism as one of the social sciences, Red, Black, and Objective expounds and develops an anarchist account of science as a social construction and social institution. Restivo's account is at once normative, analytical, organizational, and policy oriented, in particular with respect to education. With attention to the social practi…
Bruno Latour
This chapter contains sections titled: The Once and Future Philosopher The Social and Intellectual Contexts The Major Works The Theory Basic Concepts in Actor-Network Theory Critique and Opposition Bibliography
Obituary: Bernard Barber and Mary Douglas
Science, technology, and society: A Sociological Approach
A Humanistic Perspective on Science and Society
STS and the Unabomber: Personal Essays
The Cultural Dynamics of Science
The Invention of Science
Social and cultural studies of science revolutionized our understanding of science during the last quarter of the 20th century. This achievement has been accomplished in the face of great resistance and at great cost to the critics and theorists of science. In this paper, we explore some of the reasons for the resistance to and costs of analyzing science as a social fact. At the same time, we try to regain some of the momentum science studies ach…
Modern Science as a Social Problem
In the social sciences as elsewhere, modern science is widely assumed to be a successful and progressive enterprise. Sociologists of science tend to be science advocates, and students of social problems implicitly treat science as a “healthy” institution. Science critics are often opposed to “distorted” versions of science but not to “true” science. A few social critics, however, have argued that modem science is the product of an alienated human…
Development, Diversity, and Conflict in the Sociology of Science
The sociology of science has undergone considerable growth and diversification in recent years. Early sociology of science was developed within philosophical debates regarding the nature of science and the social bases of knowledge in general. Karl Mannheim and Max Scheler in the 1920s gave these discussions a specifically sociological bent. In the 1930s, the theme was made into an explicit sociology of science both by Marxists and by the functio…
The mysterious morphology of immiscible liquids: A study of scientific practice
Robber Barons and Politicians in Mathematics: A Conflict Model of Science
Randall Collins, Sal Restivo, Robber Barons and Politicians in Mathematics: A Conflict Model of Science, The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, Vol. 8, No. 2 (Spring, 1983), pp. 199-227
Comparative Studies in Science and Society
Critical Sociology of Science and Scientific Validity
Critical sociology of science, in conjunction with an emancipatory epistemology, focuses attention on the social and especially value aspects of validity and objectivity. This is the foundation for our arguments concerning the relevance of the sociology of science for explaining and understanding science, and for fashioning science policy. After outlining the basic features of critical sociology of science and emancipatory epistemology, we explor…
Parallels and Paradoxes in Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism: II — A Sociological Perspective on Parallelism
In this sequel to my paper on the nature and pitfalls of the argument that there are parallels between modern physics and ancient mysticism, I discuss parallelism as a strategy in intellectual conflict. I contrast parallelist and sociological perspective on mysticism, physics, and the relations between physics and mysticism, and sketch the societal and historical contexts of parallelist and antiparallelist arguments. Parallelists, I argue, use th…
Parallels and Paradoxes in Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism: I — A Critical Reconnaissance
This paper is a prolegomenon to a study of the social origins and functions of the thesis that there are parallels between modern physics and Eastern mysticism. Interest in the parallelism thesis has been growing, but with an emphasis on advocacy as opposed to critical analysis. Advocates of parallelism such as Fritjof Capra have failed to take account of the pitfalls associated with drawing parallels between science and religion, or physics and …
Science Studies-What is to Be Done
Consider a new treatment that was claimed to be capable of greatly improving the quality of life for those receiving it. Not only are recipients left feeling better in the short run, but they are also better able to manage their own health behavior in the long run. On the other hand, the treatment can have serious side effects, including agitation, anxiety, and misdirected fears, along with the psychogenic disorders arising from such stresses. It…
Mathematics and the limits of the sociology of knowledge
STS and the Unabomber: Personal Essays
How to criticize science and maintain your sanity
Citation for David Bloor
The Myth of the Kuhnian Revolution
The widespread adoption of the rhetoric of normal science, revolutionary science, paradigms, and exemplars by sociologists of science and sociologists in general suggests the strong influence that Thomas S. Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962, 1970) has had on sociological inquiry. But claims that Kuhn's work is antiMertonian, nonnormative, relativistic, an alternative to positivism and logical empiricism, and even compatible wit…
Mathematics and the Sociology of Knowledge
Commentary: Some Perspectives in Contemporary Sociology of Science
Technics and Praxis
Sociology and History: Notes on Rapprochement
The bases for distinguishing between sociology and history are examined and found to be insupportable insofar as the subject matter of the two disciplines coincides. The distinctions between (1) ideographic and nomothetic science, (2) art and science, and (3) humanism and science have been used to justify separating historical from sociological inquiry; in fact, these distinctions are not logically relevant to identifying fields of inquiry. This …
Comparative Studies in Science and Society
Comparative Studies in Science and Society
Parallels and Paradoxes in Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism: I — A Critical Reconnaissance
This paper is a prolegomenon to a study of the social origins and functions of the thesis that there are parallels between modern physics and Eastern mysticism. Interest in the parallelism thesis has been growing, but with an emphasis on advocacy as opposed to critical analysis. Advocates of parallelism such as Fritjof Capra have failed to take account of the pitfalls associated with drawing parallels between science and religion, or physics and …
The Knowable Future: A Psychology of Forecasting and Prophecy
Notes and Queries on Science, Technology and Human Values "Science and Technology Studies—Toronto 80," the joint annual meetings of the History of Science Society, Philosophy of Science Association, S…
Commentary: Some Perspectives in Contemporary Sociology of Science
Technics and Praxis
Mathematics and the limits of the sociology of knowledge
Parallels and Paradoxes in Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism: II — A Sociological Perspective on Parallelism
In this sequel to my paper on the nature and pitfalls of the argument that there are parallels between modern physics and ancient mysticism, I discuss parallelism as a strategy in intellectual conflict. I contrast parallelist and sociological perspective on mysticism, physics, and the relations between physics and mysticism, and sketch the societal and historical contexts of parallelist and antiparallelist arguments. Parallelists, I argue, use th…
Mathematics and the Sociology of Knowledge
The Autonomy of Science: A Historical and Comparative Analysis
Mathematics as a Cultural System . Raymond L. Wilder
Code of the Quipu: A Study in Media, Mathematics, and Culture. Marcia Ascher , Robert Ascher
The mysterious morphology of immiscible liquids: A study of scientific practice
Science and the Sociology of Knowledge.Michael Mulkay
The Social Relations of Physics, Mysticism, and Mathematics: Studies in Social Structure, Interests, and Ideas
T. S. Kuhn and Social Science
Robber Barons and Politicians in Mathematics: A Conflict Model of Science
Randall Collins, Sal Restivo, Robber Barons and Politicians in Mathematics: A Conflict Model of Science, The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, Vol. 8, No. 2 (Spring, 1983), pp. 199-227
The Myth of the Kuhnian Revolution
The widespread adoption of the rhetoric of normal science, revolutionary science, paradigms, and exemplars by sociologists of science and sociologists in general suggests the strong influence that Thomas S. Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962, 1970) has had on sociological inquiry. But claims that Kuhn's work is antiMertonian, nonnormative, relativistic, an alternative to positivism and logical empiricism, and even compatible wit…
Development, Diversity, and Conflict in the Sociology of Science
The sociology of science has undergone considerable growth and diversification in recent years. Early sociology of science was developed within philosophical debates regarding the nature of science and the social bases of knowledge in general. Karl Mannheim and Max Scheler in the 1920s gave these discussions a specifically sociological bent. In the 1930s, the theme was made into an explicit sociology of science both by Marxists and by the functio…
Between Science and Values. Loren R. Graham
Mathematics in Ancient Greece
Commentary: Science, Secrecy, and Democracy
Critical Sociology of Science and Scientific Validity
Critical sociology of science, in conjunction with an emancipatory epistemology, focuses attention on the social and especially value aspects of validity and objectivity. This is the foundation for our arguments concerning the relevance of the sociology of science for explaining and understanding science, and for fashioning science policy. After outlining the basic features of critical sociology of science and emancipatory epistemology, we explor…
Sociology (40 works) · Philosophy (36 works) · Epistemology (30 works) · Philosophy (18 works) · Computer Science (16 works) · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (14 works) · Political science (13 works) · Social science (13 works) · Psychology (10 works) · Law (9 works)