Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Sal Restivo

Biographic Data

ID3692484
NAMESal Restivo
GIVEN NAMESSal
FAMILY NAMERestivo
SIGNATURERESTIVO S
AFFILIATIONSRensselaer Polytechnic Institute
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS66
TOTAL CITATIONS109
AUTHOR COUNT66
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1970
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2023
H-INDEX5
  • The Dawkins Delusion

    Sal Restivo•CHAPTER•Beyond New Atheism and Theism•2023

    Alister McGrath, a professor of historical theology at Oxford University, published The Dawkins DELUSION? in 2007 with his wife Joanna C. McGrath, a lecturer on psychology and spirituality at Ripon College. Alister McGrath is one of those psychological and sociological curiosities who traded atheism for Christianity. He now views Dawkins’ atheism as a fundamentalist ideology. Having himself earned a PhD in molecular biophysics, he inhabits the “s…

  • The Science Turn and Sociology

    Sal Restivo•CHAPTER•Beyond New Atheism and Theism•2023

    In order to grasp what the author brings to the New Atheist/theist debates, it is necessary to achieve some understanding of the very ideas of science and sociology. Common sense and professional ideas of science and sociology are not always or at all consonant with what we know about these fields based on empirical research; second, without an accurate understanding of science and sociology, we will miss the fatal flaws of the New Atheism and of…

  • Hans Küng

    Sal Restivo•CHAPTER•Beyond New Atheism and Theism•2023

    Why do smart, educated people believe in God in the wake of the evidence against the existence of God? Hans Küng’s terrifyingly brilliant command of knowledge across the disciplines is on full display in Does God Exist? ( 1980 ). This book offers up a narrative proof for the existence of God. Why does someone who seems to know “everything” and has a powerfully critical imagination and travels across time, space, history, and culture from Plato to…

  • Case Study

    Sal Restivo•CHAPTER•Beyond New Atheism and Theism•2023

    Lennox, unlike Turek and many other apologists involved in the debate with the New Atheists, has impeccable scientific credentials. His name is attached to an alphabet soup of letters: MA, PhD, DPhil, and DSc. and he is a professor of mathematics at Oxford University. He adopts a common strategy in these debates, turning the atheists’ criticisms of the theists back toward them, accusing the atheists of the same dogmatic foolishness they attribute…

  • Beyond New Atheism and Theism: A Sociology of Science, Secularism, and Religiosity

    Sal Restivo•BOOK•Beyond New Atheism and Theism•2023

    This book addresses the flaws and fallacies in the grounds for atheism and theism – flaws and fallacies that contaminate the arguments of non-believers and believers alike. Focusing on the highly visible debates between the New Atheists – such as Christopher Hitchens, Daniel Dennett, Richard Dawkins, and Sam Harris on the one hand – and their main theist opponents – including Frank Turek, John Lennox, and William Lane Craig on the other – it appr…

  • Case Study

    Sal Restivo•CHAPTER•Beyond New Atheism and Theism•2023

    By virtue of what are at the end of day superficial signs of scholarly achievement, Craig is among the most accomplished philosophers in the realm of Christian apologetics. On the one hand, the grounded scientist, humanist, or skeptic should be embarrassed to pay any attention whatsoever to apologetics, Christian or otherwise. On the other hand, there is a clear and present danger in the seductive potential of such apologetics to persuade the un-…

  • The New Atheist Worldview 1

    Sal Restivo•CHAPTER•Beyond New Atheism and Theism•2023

    This chapter focuses on the thoughts and arguments of the New Atheists, Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris, and the fifth “horseman,” Ayaan Hirsi Ali. In general, they argue that science is worth defending because modifications of technologies are the salvation of our planet. This is really a defense of the “technological fix,” the idea that technology holds the secret to solving all of our problems, technical or so…

  • The Knowing Society

    Sal Restivo•CHAPTER•Beyond New Atheism and Theism•2023

    In this chapter, the author concludes his assessment of New Atheism and theism as incommensurable worldviews that can only be opposed by an alternative worldview. The debates between the New Atheists and theists, like the movie Groundhog Day , repeat themselves debate after debate. Unlike the movie, these debates go on and on without reaching a moral or intellectual resolution. The debate methodology is a way for the debaters to present their vie…

  • Case Study

    Sal Restivo•CHAPTER•Beyond New Atheism and Theism•2023

    In this chapter the author considers an exemplary rebuttal to the New Atheists, Frank Turek’s argument that the “atheists need God to make their case.” Turek introduces the acronym CRIMES to ground his claim that atheists must steal from God to make their arguments. Atheists talk and write about C-ausality, R-eason, I-nformation and I-ntentionality, M-orality, E-vil, and S-cience. None of these features of reality, according to Turek, would exist…

  • In the Grasp of Secular Reason

    Sal Restivo•CHAPTER•Beyond New Atheism and Theism•2023

    Chapter 2 introduces the author as a nonbeliever. Autobiographical remarks might seem out of place in a sociological treatise. The author argues to the contrary that they are not out of place here. The reason is that believers and nonbelievers, theists and atheists occupying soap boxes in the public square do not rehearse their own biographies, which in fact are narratives of how they were socialized. They were not born with their views on religi…

  • Case Study

    Sal Restivo•CHAPTER•Beyond New Atheism and Theism•2023

    Alvin Plantinga argues that a person can assert that they know God exists, without argument, as a basic belief; belief in God is rational and basic without evidence of existence. Who is Alvin Plantinga? Alvin Plantinga (1932–) is by any measure a distinguished fixture in the pantheon of twentieth-century analytic philosophers and Christian philosophers. The author condemns all of the honors attached to Plantinga’s achievements, the very “discipli…

  • Godless but Good

    Sal Restivo•CHAPTER•Beyond New Atheism and Theism•2023

    In this chapter, the author counters the theist claim that morality cannot be justified if there is no God. Sociologist of religion Phil Zuckerman has demonstrated that societies without God not only are possible but are a reality (e.g., Denmark and Sweden). Atheist and secular philosophers argue that (1) religion is at war with rationality, (2) religion veils us from a reality that poses formidable challenges (such as death without the promise o…

  • Religion and God in Sociological Perspective

    Sal Restivo•CHAPTER•Beyond New Atheism and Theism•2023

    This chapter sketches a paradigm for the sociology of religion and the gods. Religious beliefs and institutions were an important concern of the nineteenth-century social thinkers who fashioned the sociological perspective. Among the leading contributors to the sociology of religion in that century were William Robertson Smith, Ludwig Feuerbach, Louis Wallis, Karl Kautsky, Max Weber, Karl Marx, and, most importantly, Emile Durkheim. These thinker…

  • Genesis

    Sal Restivo•CHAPTER•Beyond New Atheism and Theism•2023

    In this chapter, the author introduces and defines the scientific cogito, compares it to the theological cogito, and reviews the history of the very idea of atheism. The scientific cogito defines science as presumptive, corrigible, fallible, and a collective historical process that establishes facts of the matter over time and always colored in skepticism. Faith and blind faith have no role in this process. The theological cogito, which seeks a r…

  • Afterword

    Open Access•Mário Mesquita, Mônica Mesquita et al.•ARTICLE•Revista Latinoamericana de…•2020

    From the moment that authors from different parts of the world began to question the absence of sociocultural bases in the formation of mathematical knowledge, inside and outside the academic universe, a fertile field was opened to face truths that had long been ignored in discourses about the nature of mathematics. This problem was addressed directly and creatively by the Brazilian educator and mathematician Ubiratan D'Ambrosio in 1977. In a tal…

  • Einstein's Brain: Genius, Culture, and Social Networks

    Sal Restivo•BOOK•Einstein's Brain•2019

  • The Age of the Social: The Discovery of Society and the Ascendance of a New Episteme

    Sal Restivo•BOOK•Age of the Social•2018

    The concept of society sui generis – society as a level of reality which could be studied scientifically – crystallized in the middle of the nineteenth century in Europe, with the work of Durkheim, Marx and Weber and today, more than at any other period in history, the idea of the social has gained a foothold in philosophy, biology, and neuroscience. However, this idea has emerged into prominence not through the historical or contemporary efforts…

  • Red, Black, and Objective: Science, Sociology, and Anarchism

    Sal Restivo•BOOK•Red, Black, and Objective•2016

    Drawing on the empirical findings generated by researchers in science studies, and adopting Kropotkin's concept of anarchism as one of the social sciences, Red, Black, and Objective expounds and develops an anarchist account of science as a social construction and social institution. Restivo's account is at once normative, analytical, organizational, and policy oriented, in particular with respect to education. With attention to the social practi…

  • Bruno Latour

    Open Access•Sal Restivo•OTHER•The Wiley‐Blackwell Companion to…•2011

    This chapter contains sections titled: The Once and Future Philosopher The Social and Intellectual Contexts The Major Works The Theory Basic Concepts in Actor-Network Theory Critique and Opposition Bibliography

  • Obituary: Bernard Barber and Mary Douglas

    Open Access•Sal Restivo, Rachel Dowty•ARTICLE•Social Studies of Science•2008•References: 10

  • Science, technology, and society: A Sociological Approach

    Wenda K Bauchspies, Jennifer Croissant et al.•BOOK•Science, technology, and society•2006

  • A Humanistic Perspective on Science and Society

    Open Access•Sal Restivo, Michael Zenzen•ARTICLE•Humanity & Society•2003•References: 13

  • STS and the Unabomber: Personal Essays

    Open Access•Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•Science Technology & Human Values•2001•Cited by: 1

  • The Cultural Dynamics of Science

    Open Access•Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•Cultural Dynamics•2000

  • The Invention of Science

    Open Access•Sal Restivo, Julia Loughlin•ARTICLE•Cultural Dynamics•2000•References: 15

    Social and cultural studies of science revolutionized our understanding of science during the last quarter of the 20th century. This achievement has been accomplished in the face of great resistance and at great cost to the critics and theorists of science. In this paper, we explore some of the reasons for the resistance to and costs of analyzing science as a social fact. At the same time, we try to regain some of the momentum science studies ach…

Next
  • Modern Science as a Social Problem

    Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•Social Problems•1988•Cited by: 46•References: 41

    In the social sciences as elsewhere, modern science is widely assumed to be a successful and progressive enterprise. Sociologists of science tend to be science advocates, and students of social problems implicitly treat science as a “healthy” institution. Science critics are often opposed to “distorted” versions of science but not to “true” science. A few social critics, however, have argued that modem science is the product of an alienated human…

  • Development, Diversity, and Conflict in the Sociology of Science

    Open Access•Randall Collins, Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•Sociological Quarterly•1983•Cited by: 14•References: 34

    The sociology of science has undergone considerable growth and diversification in recent years. Early sociology of science was developed within philosophical debates regarding the nature of science and the social bases of knowledge in general. Karl Mannheim and Max Scheler in the 1920s gave these discussions a specifically sociological bent. In the 1930s, the theme was made into an explicit sociology of science both by Marxists and by the functio…

  • The mysterious morphology of immiscible liquids: A study of scientific practice

    Open Access•Michael Zenzen, Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•Social Science Information•1982•Cited by: 11•References: 10

  • Robber Barons and Politicians in Mathematics: A Conflict Model of Science

    Open Access•Randall Collins, Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•The Canadian Journal of Sociology•1983•Cited by: 7

    Randall Collins, Sal Restivo, Robber Barons and Politicians in Mathematics: A Conflict Model of Science, The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, Vol. 8, No. 2 (Spring, 1983), pp. 199-227

  • Comparative Studies in Science and Society

    R D Whitley, Richard Whitley et al.•ARTICLE•British Journal of Sociology•1975•Cited by: 6

  • Critical Sociology of Science and Scientific Validity

    Open Access•Sal Restivo, Julia Loughlin•ARTICLE•Knowledge•1987•Cited by: 5•References: 6

    Critical sociology of science, in conjunction with an emancipatory epistemology, focuses attention on the social and especially value aspects of validity and objectivity. This is the foundation for our arguments concerning the relevance of the sociology of science for explaining and understanding science, and for fashioning science policy. After outlining the basic features of critical sociology of science and emancipatory epistemology, we explor…

  • Parallels and Paradoxes in Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism: II — A Sociological Perspective on Parallelism

    Open Access•Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•Social Studies of Science•1982•Cited by: 5•References: 2

    In this sequel to my paper on the nature and pitfalls of the argument that there are parallels between modern physics and ancient mysticism, I discuss parallelism as a strategy in intellectual conflict. I contrast parallelist and sociological perspective on mysticism, physics, and the relations between physics and mysticism, and sketch the societal and historical contexts of parallelist and antiparallelist arguments. Parallelists, I argue, use th…

  • Parallels and Paradoxes in Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism: I — A Critical Reconnaissance

    Open Access•Sal P Restivo, Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•Social Studies of Science•1978•Cited by: 4

    This paper is a prolegomenon to a study of the social origins and functions of the thesis that there are parallels between modern physics and Eastern mysticism. Interest in the parallelism thesis has been growing, but with an emphasis on advocacy as opposed to critical analysis. Advocates of parallelism such as Fritjof Capra have failed to take account of the pitfalls associated with drawing parallels between science and religion, or physics and …

  • Science Studies-What is to Be Done

    Open Access•Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•Science Technology & Human Values•1987•Cited by: 2

    Consider a new treatment that was claimed to be capable of greatly improving the quality of life for those receiving it. Not only are recipients left feeling better in the short run, but they are also better able to manage their own health behavior in the long run. On the other hand, the treatment can have serious side effects, including agitation, anxiety, and misdirected fears, along with the psychogenic disorders arising from such stresses. It…

  • Mathematics and the limits of the sociology of knowledge

    Open Access•Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•Social Science Information•1981•Cited by: 2•References: 5

  • STS and the Unabomber: Personal Essays

    Open Access•Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•Science Technology & Human Values•2001•Cited by: 1

  • How to criticize science and maintain your sanity

    Sal Restivo, Wenda K Bauchspies et al.•ARTICLE•Science as Culture•1997•Cited by: 1•References: 6

  • Citation for David Bloor

    Open Access•Karin Knorr-Cetina, Karin D Knorr-Cetina et al.•ARTICLE•Science Technology & Human Values•1997•Cited by: 1

  • The Myth of the Kuhnian Revolution

    Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•Sociological Theory•1983•Cited by: 1

    The widespread adoption of the rhetoric of normal science, revolutionary science, paradigms, and exemplars by sociologists of science and sociologists in general suggests the strong influence that Thomas S. Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962, 1970) has had on sociological inquiry. But claims that Kuhn's work is antiMertonian, nonnormative, relativistic, an alternative to positivism and logical empiricism, and even compatible wit…

  • Mathematics and the Sociology of Knowledge

    Open Access•Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•Knowledge•1982•Cited by: 1•References: 17

  • Commentary: Some Perspectives in Contemporary Sociology of Science

    Open Access•Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•Science Technology & Human Values•1981•Cited by: 1

  • Technics and Praxis

    Sal Restivo, Don Ihde•ARTICLE•Technology and Culture•1981•Cited by: 1

  • Sociology and History: Notes on Rapprochement

    Open Access•Sal P Restivo, Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•Social Thought and Research•1970•References: 8

    The bases for distinguishing between sociology and history are examined and found to be insupportable insofar as the subject matter of the two disciplines coincides. The distinctions between (1) ideographic and nomothetic science, (2) art and science, and (3) humanism and science have been used to justify separating historical from sociological inquiry; in fact, these distinctions are not logically relevant to identifying fields of inquiry. This …

  • Comparative Studies in Science and Society

    R D Whitley, Richard Whitley et al.•ARTICLE•British Journal of Sociology•1975•Cited by: 6

  • Comparative Studies in Science and Society

    Stephen O Murray, Sal Restivo et al.•ARTICLE•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1976

  • Parallels and Paradoxes in Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism: I — A Critical Reconnaissance

    Open Access•Sal P Restivo, Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•Social Studies of Science•1978•Cited by: 4

    This paper is a prolegomenon to a study of the social origins and functions of the thesis that there are parallels between modern physics and Eastern mysticism. Interest in the parallelism thesis has been growing, but with an emphasis on advocacy as opposed to critical analysis. Advocates of parallelism such as Fritjof Capra have failed to take account of the pitfalls associated with drawing parallels between science and religion, or physics and …

  • The Knowable Future: A Psychology of Forecasting and Prophecy

    Sal Restivo, David Loye•ARTICLE•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1979

  • Notes and Queries on Science, Technology and Human Values "Science and Technology Studies—Toronto 80," the joint annual meetings of the History of Science Society, Philosophy of Science Association, S…

    Open Access•Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•Science Technology & Human Values•1981

  • Commentary: Some Perspectives in Contemporary Sociology of Science

    Open Access•Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•Science Technology & Human Values•1981•Cited by: 1

  • Technics and Praxis

    Sal Restivo, Don Ihde•ARTICLE•Technology and Culture•1981•Cited by: 1

  • Mathematics and the limits of the sociology of knowledge

    Open Access•Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•Social Science Information•1981•Cited by: 2•References: 5

  • Parallels and Paradoxes in Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism: II — A Sociological Perspective on Parallelism

    Open Access•Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•Social Studies of Science•1982•Cited by: 5•References: 2

    In this sequel to my paper on the nature and pitfalls of the argument that there are parallels between modern physics and ancient mysticism, I discuss parallelism as a strategy in intellectual conflict. I contrast parallelist and sociological perspective on mysticism, physics, and the relations between physics and mysticism, and sketch the societal and historical contexts of parallelist and antiparallelist arguments. Parallelists, I argue, use th…

  • Mathematics and the Sociology of Knowledge

    Open Access•Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•Knowledge•1982•Cited by: 1•References: 17

  • The Autonomy of Science: A Historical and Comparative Analysis

    Sal Restivo, Maurice N Richter•ARTICLE•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1982

  • Mathematics as a Cultural System . Raymond L. Wilder

    Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•Isis•1982

  • Code of the Quipu: A Study in Media, Mathematics, and Culture. Marcia Ascher , Robert Ascher

    Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•Isis•1982

  • The mysterious morphology of immiscible liquids: A study of scientific practice

    Open Access•Michael Zenzen, Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•Social Science Information•1982•Cited by: 11•References: 10

  • Science and the Sociology of Knowledge.Michael Mulkay

    Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•American Journal of Sociology•1982

  • The Social Relations of Physics, Mysticism, and Mathematics: Studies in Social Structure, Interests, and Ideas

    Open Access•Sal Restivo•BOOK•Social Relations of Physics,…•1983

  • T. S. Kuhn and Social Science

    Sal Restivo, Barry Barnes•ARTICLE•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1983

  • Robber Barons and Politicians in Mathematics: A Conflict Model of Science

    Open Access•Randall Collins, Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•The Canadian Journal of Sociology•1983•Cited by: 7

    Randall Collins, Sal Restivo, Robber Barons and Politicians in Mathematics: A Conflict Model of Science, The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, Vol. 8, No. 2 (Spring, 1983), pp. 199-227

  • The Myth of the Kuhnian Revolution

    Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•Sociological Theory•1983•Cited by: 1

    The widespread adoption of the rhetoric of normal science, revolutionary science, paradigms, and exemplars by sociologists of science and sociologists in general suggests the strong influence that Thomas S. Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962, 1970) has had on sociological inquiry. But claims that Kuhn's work is antiMertonian, nonnormative, relativistic, an alternative to positivism and logical empiricism, and even compatible wit…

  • Development, Diversity, and Conflict in the Sociology of Science

    Open Access•Randall Collins, Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•Sociological Quarterly•1983•Cited by: 14•References: 34

    The sociology of science has undergone considerable growth and diversification in recent years. Early sociology of science was developed within philosophical debates regarding the nature of science and the social bases of knowledge in general. Karl Mannheim and Max Scheler in the 1920s gave these discussions a specifically sociological bent. In the 1930s, the theme was made into an explicit sociology of science both by Marxists and by the functio…

  • Between Science and Values. Loren R. Graham

    Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•American Journal of Sociology•1984

  • Mathematics in Ancient Greece

    Sal Restivo•CHAPTER•Social Relations of Physics,…•1985

  • Commentary: Science, Secrecy, and Democracy

    Open Access•Sal Restivo•ARTICLE•Science Technology & Human Values•1986

  • Critical Sociology of Science and Scientific Validity

    Open Access•Sal Restivo, Julia Loughlin•ARTICLE•Knowledge•1987•Cited by: 5•References: 6

    Critical sociology of science, in conjunction with an emancipatory epistemology, focuses attention on the social and especially value aspects of validity and objectivity. This is the foundation for our arguments concerning the relevance of the sociology of science for explaining and understanding science, and for fashioning science policy. After outlining the basic features of critical sociology of science and emancipatory epistemology, we explor…

Sociology (40 works) · Philosophy (36 works) · Epistemology (30 works) · Philosophy (18 works) · Computer Science (16 works) · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (14 works) · Political science (13 works) · Social science (13 works) · Psychology (10 works) · Law (9 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae