Alireza Kazemi
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 3698232 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Alireza Kazemi |
| PRENOMES | Alireza |
| SOBRENOME | Kazemi |
| ASSINATURA | KAZEMI A |
| AFILIAÇÕES | Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-0875-503X |
| VERIFICADO | Sim |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 19 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 5 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 19 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2008 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2026 |
| ÍNDICE H | 1 |
How (Not) to Explain Deontic Status by Good Reasoning
Belief Normativism and the Motivation Problem
Belief normativists claim that certain mental phenomena are best explained by holding that belief is constituted by a truth norm. These phenomena include deliberative transparency, according to which the deliberative question whether to believe that p is necessarily and immediately settled by answering the question whether p , and Moore's paradox, which concerns the impossibility or sheer absurdity of believing that p while judging that not‐ p . …
What is the norm of intention
How to Explain Moore’s Paradox Normatively
Caution and supererogation
Seyyed Mohsen Eslami and Alfred Archer have argued for what they call the cautionary account of supererogation. According to this account, an action is supererogatory iff it involves exercising caution in doing the right thing in cases where the agent's self-interest gets into conflict with the interests of others. They argue that further to be interesting in its own right, this account can solve some problems that bedevil other accounts. In this…
Seeking versus receiving help
The current research examined how seeking versus receiving help affected children's memory and confidence decisions. Baseline performance, when no help was available, was compared to performance when help could be sought (Experiment 1: N = 83, 41 females) or was provided (Experiment 2: N = 84, 44 females) in a sample of predominately White 5-, 7-, and 9-year-olds from Northern California. Data collection occurred from 2018 to 2019. In Experiment …
The norms of belief as the norms of commitment
Much of the discussion on the normativity of belief rests on the presupposition that there is a single fundamental truth norm governing belief that explains all of its normative features. Building on the committive conception of belief proposed by some normativists, this article takes issue with this presupposition. In particular, it is argued that belief, construed as cognitive commitment, is governed by three fundamental‐cum‐irreducible norms, …
Reasoning and commitment
Still committed to the normativity of folk psychology
In what sense can one claim that intentional explanations are essentially normative, given that people’s actions and thinking are replete with various irrationalities, yet are still pretty well explained by this explanatory framework? This article provides a novel response to this enduring objection. First, following Brandom, it is suggested that, to understand the normativity of intentional states, we should countenance and distinguish between t…
Substance of choice, impact of heroin or opium on treatment retention in a multicentre randomised controlled trial in Iran
Ibn Sina and Mulla Sadra on God’s Knowledge of Particulars
The problem of God’s knowledge of particulars goes back to the beginnings of classical philosophy, and within the context of Islamic philosophy and theology, diverse schools have arisen which respond to this problem in different ways. The scope and depth of God’s knowledge of our world, which also includes knowledge of human will and human action, is the subject of Ibn Sina’s account of God’s knowledge of particulars, which I set out to discuss i…
Causal Relations and Abraham’s Dilemma
Transparency and the truth norm of belief
Developmental Differences in Subjective Recollection and Its Role in Decision Making
We examined how subjective assessments of recollection guide decision making. Subjective recollection was dissociated from accuracy during a forced-choice recognition task. Distracters were either similar to targets (match condition) or to other studied, but untested items (nonmatch condition). We assessed 223 participants (112 males) across three experiments (137 White, 37 Asian-American, 7 African-American, 4 American-Indian, 32 mixed race, 6 u…
Covid-19, Scarce Resources and Priority Ethics
Response latencies and eye gaze provide insight on how toddlers gather evidence under uncertainty
Propositional Attitudes as Commitments
In a series of articles, Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen and Nick Zangwill argue that, since propositional attitude (PA) ascription judgements do not behave like normative judgements in being subject toa priorinormative supervenience and the Because Constraint, PAs cannot be constitutively normative.1I argue that, for a specific version of normativism, according to which PAs are normative commitments, these arguments fail. To this end, I argue that com…
A comprehensive study of geothermal heating and cooling systems
What they fill in today, may not be useful tomorrow
The Medical Records are expected to be complete and accurate. Our study has unveiled that the Medical Records are not documented properly in the university hospital where the Medical Records are also used for educational purposes. Such incomplete Medical Records are not reliable resources for medical care too. Some influencing factors external to the structure of the Medical Records (i.e. human factors and work conditions) are involved
Response latencies and eye gaze provide insight on how toddlers gather evidence under uncertainty
Propositional Attitudes as Commitments
In a series of articles, Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen and Nick Zangwill argue that, since propositional attitude (PA) ascription judgements do not behave like normative judgements in being subject toa priorinormative supervenience and the Because Constraint, PAs cannot be constitutively normative.1I argue that, for a specific version of normativism, according to which PAs are normative commitments, these arguments fail. To this end, I argue that com…
What they fill in today, may not be useful tomorrow
The Medical Records are expected to be complete and accurate. Our study has unveiled that the Medical Records are not documented properly in the university hospital where the Medical Records are also used for educational purposes. Such incomplete Medical Records are not reliable resources for medical care too. Some influencing factors external to the structure of the Medical Records (i.e. human factors and work conditions) are involved
A comprehensive study of geothermal heating and cooling systems
Response latencies and eye gaze provide insight on how toddlers gather evidence under uncertainty
Propositional Attitudes as Commitments
In a series of articles, Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen and Nick Zangwill argue that, since propositional attitude (PA) ascription judgements do not behave like normative judgements in being subject toa priorinormative supervenience and the Because Constraint, PAs cannot be constitutively normative.1I argue that, for a specific version of normativism, according to which PAs are normative commitments, these arguments fail. To this end, I argue that com…
Developmental Differences in Subjective Recollection and Its Role in Decision Making
We examined how subjective assessments of recollection guide decision making. Subjective recollection was dissociated from accuracy during a forced-choice recognition task. Distracters were either similar to targets (match condition) or to other studied, but untested items (nonmatch condition). We assessed 223 participants (112 males) across three experiments (137 White, 37 Asian-American, 7 African-American, 4 American-Indian, 32 mixed race, 6 u…
Covid-19, Scarce Resources and Priority Ethics
Still committed to the normativity of folk psychology
In what sense can one claim that intentional explanations are essentially normative, given that people’s actions and thinking are replete with various irrationalities, yet are still pretty well explained by this explanatory framework? This article provides a novel response to this enduring objection. First, following Brandom, it is suggested that, to understand the normativity of intentional states, we should countenance and distinguish between t…
Substance of choice, impact of heroin or opium on treatment retention in a multicentre randomised controlled trial in Iran
Ibn Sina and Mulla Sadra on God’s Knowledge of Particulars
The problem of God’s knowledge of particulars goes back to the beginnings of classical philosophy, and within the context of Islamic philosophy and theology, diverse schools have arisen which respond to this problem in different ways. The scope and depth of God’s knowledge of our world, which also includes knowledge of human will and human action, is the subject of Ibn Sina’s account of God’s knowledge of particulars, which I set out to discuss i…
Causal Relations and Abraham’s Dilemma
Transparency and the truth norm of belief
The norms of belief as the norms of commitment
Much of the discussion on the normativity of belief rests on the presupposition that there is a single fundamental truth norm governing belief that explains all of its normative features. Building on the committive conception of belief proposed by some normativists, this article takes issue with this presupposition. In particular, it is argued that belief, construed as cognitive commitment, is governed by three fundamental‐cum‐irreducible norms, …
Reasoning and commitment
Seeking versus receiving help
The current research examined how seeking versus receiving help affected children's memory and confidence decisions. Baseline performance, when no help was available, was compared to performance when help could be sought (Experiment 1: N = 83, 41 females) or was provided (Experiment 2: N = 84, 44 females) in a sample of predominately White 5-, 7-, and 9-year-olds from Northern California. Data collection occurred from 2018 to 2019. In Experiment …
How to Explain Moore’s Paradox Normatively
Caution and supererogation
Seyyed Mohsen Eslami and Alfred Archer have argued for what they call the cautionary account of supererogation. According to this account, an action is supererogatory iff it involves exercising caution in doing the right thing in cases where the agent's self-interest gets into conflict with the interests of others. They argue that further to be interesting in its own right, this account can solve some problems that bedevil other accounts. In this…
How (Not) to Explain Deontic Status by Good Reasoning
Belief Normativism and the Motivation Problem
Belief normativists claim that certain mental phenomena are best explained by holding that belief is constituted by a truth norm. These phenomena include deliberative transparency, according to which the deliberative question whether to believe that p is necessarily and immediately settled by answering the question whether p , and Moore's paradox, which concerns the impossibility or sheer absurdity of believing that p while judging that not‐ p . …
What is the norm of intention
Epistemology (11 obras) · Philosophy (11 obras) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (9 obras) · Psychology (7 obras) · Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 obras) · Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 obras) · Computer Science (5 obras) · Normative (5 obras) · Child and Animal Learning Development (3 obras) · Developmental psychology (3 obras)