Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Sebastian Linke

Biographic Data

ID3720138
NAMESebastian Linke
GIVEN NAMESSebastian
FAMILY NAMELinke
SIGNATURELINKE S
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Gothenburg
ORCID0000-0003-0758-3715
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS13
TOTAL CITATIONS27
WORKS AS AUTHOR13
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2011
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX3
  • Navigating dilemmas with formalization of advisory processes

    Open Access•Kåre Nolde Nielsen, Sebastian Linke et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2024•References: 5

    Formalization is an important aspect of the provision of scientific advice, which has received limited scholarly attention, and needs further conceptualization. Drawing on Adler and Bory’s distinction between enabling and coercive formalization, we analyze advisory processes in a boundary organization. We do so with a case study of the provision of annual fisheries advice by the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES). Based o…

  • Making Science Relevant

    Open Access•Göran Sundqvist, Sebastian Linke•ARTICLE•Minerva•2024•Cited by: 4•References: 5

    This article compares two science advisory organizations: the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) and the International Council for the Exploration of the Seas (ICES), with a special focus on how their respective policy systems absorb the knowledge delivered for use in decision processes. The science-policy processes of these two organizations differ in important respects; ICES delivers highly specified knowledge to a specified upta…

  • Aligning top-down and bottom-up modes of governance? How EU Fisheries Local Action Groups support small-scale fisheries and coastal community development in Sweden

    Open Access•Sebastian Linke, Nathan Siegrist•ARTICLE•Sociologia Ruralis•2024•Cited by: 3•References: 44

    Small-scale fisheries and coastal communities experienced dramatic downward trends over recent decades impacting rural development on European coastlines. Fisheries governance in the European Union (EU) follows exogenous top-down regulations steering fishing practices through detailed regulations. In contrast, the EU's structural funding system of Fisheries Local Action Groups (FLAGs) involves an endogenous approach consisting of more participato…

  • Fisheries local action groups, small-scale fisheries and territorial development

    Open Access•Jeremy Phillipson, Pekka Salmi et al.•ARTICLE•Sociologia Ruralis•2024•Cited by: 1•References: 29

    In comparison to the wealth of critical evaluation of LEADER (i.e., Liaison entre actions de développement de l'économie rurale), there has been no consolidated attempt to reflect on the contribution of Fisheries Local Action Groups (FLAGs), now entering their third EU programming period. Set up in the image of LEADER, and a novel governance instrument within the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), FLAGs aim to activate local responses that build resi…

  • Roles for advisory science in the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (Ices)

    Open Access•Sebastian Linke, Kåre Nolde Nielsen et al.•ARTICLE•Marine Policy•2023

    What role should science take when providing advice in support of policy and politics? Should a provider of science-based advice have its own position on the issues it provides advise on? Or should it be as impartial as possible from the value and policy context of the advice? This theme, long debated, gained new attention in fisheries and marine governance. Starting from theoretical concepts and stylised models, this study attends to a theory-pr…

  • Close but not too close’ – experiences of science-policy bridging in three international advisory organizations

    Open Access•Matteo De Donà, Sebastian Linke•ARTICLE•Critical Policy Studies•2022•References: 26

    The role of science in environmental decision-making calls for an improved understanding of how scientific advice can best inform policy. Policy-relevant science is trapped in the conundrum of being close to policy and politics while trying not to become too close, to avoid politicization. We investigate this dilemma in three scientific advisory organizations: the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES), the Intergovernmental …

  • More than just a carding system

    Open Access•Alin Kadfak, Sebastian Linke•ARTICLE•Marine Policy•2021

    Globally, the EU plays a leading role in combating illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing activities. Specifically, the EU exercises normative power to influence regulatory strategies and governing frameworks in third countries. In 2015, the EU issued Thailand a yellow card, indicating that economic sanctions would be implemented unless IUU fishing practices were eliminated. Concurrently, revelations about ‘modern slavery’ in Thailand’…

  • Swimming upstream

    Open Access•Milena Arias Schreiber, Ida Wingren et al.•ARTICLE•Sustainability Science•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    The EU Blue Growth agenda is being implemented at a time when European coastal fisheries and traditional fishing communities are struggling to survive or have already vanished from areas where they used to flourish. Driven by the strong conviction that current disadvantaged and vulnerable coastal fishers still have a central role to play in rural development, local level initiatives are calling for a different future for this fishery sector. The …

  • The legitimization of concern

    Open Access•J Metzger, Linda Soneryd et al.•ARTICLE•Environment and Planning A…•2017•Cited by: 3•References: 36

    From the 1990s and onwards, environmental planning and governance has undergone a broad participatory turn. This paper focuses on one specific aspect of participatory processes and the concrete arrangements through which they are carried out, more specifically: how such processes always come to enact some actors as 'legitimately concerned' stakeholders and others not. Such investigations bring into focus context-specific effects of inclusion and …

  • Ideals, realities and paradoxes of stakeholder participation in EU fisheries governance

    Sebastian Linke, Jentoft•ARTICLE•Environmental Sociology•2016•Cited by: 2•References: 7

    A participatory turn towards more democratic policy-making and decision-making that involves stakeholders has occurred in EU environmental governance since roughly 2000. Despite ubiquitous emphases in favour of 'good governance principles', we still know little about their effects in concrete settings where stakeholders are involved in policy and management. Two recent reforms of the EU's Common Fisheries Policy introduced stakeholder participati…

  • Unravelling science-policy interactions in environmental risk governance of the Baltic Sea

    Sebastian Linke, Michael Gilek et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Risk Research•2013•Cited by: 9•References: 5

    Interactions between scientific assessments and management decision-making are key determinants for the efficiency of environmental risk governance. This applies particularly to marine ecosystems like the Baltic Sea, where fisheries and eutrophication pose serious threats connected to environmental, social and economic aspects of sustainability. Using contemporary science-policy theory, this paper investigates structures, challenges and prospects…

  • Contexts constrain science in the public

    Open Access•Sebastian Linke•ARTICLE•Public Understanding of Science•2012

    This article reports on a media study on the coverage of sociobiology (SB) in the German media. The analyses show a decoupling between the academic discussion and the German media coverage: when the scientific debates about SB were at their height (late 1970s), nearly no reporting occurred in the German press, whereas from the middle of the 1990s onwards, when the academic discussion had settled, SB was presented increasingly often. The case reve…

  • The Regional Advisory Councils

    Open Access•Sebastian Linke, Marion Dreyer et al.•ARTICLE•AMBIO•2011•Cited by: 4•References: 21

  • Unravelling science-policy interactions in environmental risk governance of the Baltic Sea

    Sebastian Linke, Michael Gilek et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Risk Research•2013•Cited by: 9•References: 5

    Interactions between scientific assessments and management decision-making are key determinants for the efficiency of environmental risk governance. This applies particularly to marine ecosystems like the Baltic Sea, where fisheries and eutrophication pose serious threats connected to environmental, social and economic aspects of sustainability. Using contemporary science-policy theory, this paper investigates structures, challenges and prospects…

  • Making Science Relevant

    Open Access•Göran Sundqvist, Sebastian Linke•ARTICLE•Minerva•2024•Cited by: 4•References: 5

    This article compares two science advisory organizations: the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) and the International Council for the Exploration of the Seas (ICES), with a special focus on how their respective policy systems absorb the knowledge delivered for use in decision processes. The science-policy processes of these two organizations differ in important respects; ICES delivers highly specified knowledge to a specified upta…

  • The Regional Advisory Councils

    Open Access•Sebastian Linke, Marion Dreyer et al.•ARTICLE•AMBIO•2011•Cited by: 4•References: 21

  • Aligning top-down and bottom-up modes of governance? How EU Fisheries Local Action Groups support small-scale fisheries and coastal community development in Sweden

    Open Access•Sebastian Linke, Nathan Siegrist•ARTICLE•Sociologia Ruralis•2024•Cited by: 3•References: 44

    Small-scale fisheries and coastal communities experienced dramatic downward trends over recent decades impacting rural development on European coastlines. Fisheries governance in the European Union (EU) follows exogenous top-down regulations steering fishing practices through detailed regulations. In contrast, the EU's structural funding system of Fisheries Local Action Groups (FLAGs) involves an endogenous approach consisting of more participato…

  • The legitimization of concern

    Open Access•J Metzger, Linda Soneryd et al.•ARTICLE•Environment and Planning A…•2017•Cited by: 3•References: 36

    From the 1990s and onwards, environmental planning and governance has undergone a broad participatory turn. This paper focuses on one specific aspect of participatory processes and the concrete arrangements through which they are carried out, more specifically: how such processes always come to enact some actors as 'legitimately concerned' stakeholders and others not. Such investigations bring into focus context-specific effects of inclusion and …

  • Ideals, realities and paradoxes of stakeholder participation in EU fisheries governance

    Sebastian Linke, Jentoft•ARTICLE•Environmental Sociology•2016•Cited by: 2•References: 7

    A participatory turn towards more democratic policy-making and decision-making that involves stakeholders has occurred in EU environmental governance since roughly 2000. Despite ubiquitous emphases in favour of 'good governance principles', we still know little about their effects in concrete settings where stakeholders are involved in policy and management. Two recent reforms of the EU's Common Fisheries Policy introduced stakeholder participati…

  • Fisheries local action groups, small-scale fisheries and territorial development

    Open Access•Jeremy Phillipson, Pekka Salmi et al.•ARTICLE•Sociologia Ruralis•2024•Cited by: 1•References: 29

    In comparison to the wealth of critical evaluation of LEADER (i.e., Liaison entre actions de développement de l'économie rurale), there has been no consolidated attempt to reflect on the contribution of Fisheries Local Action Groups (FLAGs), now entering their third EU programming period. Set up in the image of LEADER, and a novel governance instrument within the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), FLAGs aim to activate local responses that build resi…

  • Swimming upstream

    Open Access•Milena Arias Schreiber, Ida Wingren et al.•ARTICLE•Sustainability Science•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    The EU Blue Growth agenda is being implemented at a time when European coastal fisheries and traditional fishing communities are struggling to survive or have already vanished from areas where they used to flourish. Driven by the strong conviction that current disadvantaged and vulnerable coastal fishers still have a central role to play in rural development, local level initiatives are calling for a different future for this fishery sector. The …

  • The Regional Advisory Councils

    Open Access•Sebastian Linke, Marion Dreyer et al.•ARTICLE•AMBIO•2011•Cited by: 4•References: 21

  • Contexts constrain science in the public

    Open Access•Sebastian Linke•ARTICLE•Public Understanding of Science•2012

    This article reports on a media study on the coverage of sociobiology (SB) in the German media. The analyses show a decoupling between the academic discussion and the German media coverage: when the scientific debates about SB were at their height (late 1970s), nearly no reporting occurred in the German press, whereas from the middle of the 1990s onwards, when the academic discussion had settled, SB was presented increasingly often. The case reve…

  • Unravelling science-policy interactions in environmental risk governance of the Baltic Sea

    Sebastian Linke, Michael Gilek et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Risk Research•2013•Cited by: 9•References: 5

    Interactions between scientific assessments and management decision-making are key determinants for the efficiency of environmental risk governance. This applies particularly to marine ecosystems like the Baltic Sea, where fisheries and eutrophication pose serious threats connected to environmental, social and economic aspects of sustainability. Using contemporary science-policy theory, this paper investigates structures, challenges and prospects…

  • Ideals, realities and paradoxes of stakeholder participation in EU fisheries governance

    Sebastian Linke, Jentoft•ARTICLE•Environmental Sociology•2016•Cited by: 2•References: 7

    A participatory turn towards more democratic policy-making and decision-making that involves stakeholders has occurred in EU environmental governance since roughly 2000. Despite ubiquitous emphases in favour of 'good governance principles', we still know little about their effects in concrete settings where stakeholders are involved in policy and management. Two recent reforms of the EU's Common Fisheries Policy introduced stakeholder participati…

  • The legitimization of concern

    Open Access•J Metzger, Linda Soneryd et al.•ARTICLE•Environment and Planning A…•2017•Cited by: 3•References: 36

    From the 1990s and onwards, environmental planning and governance has undergone a broad participatory turn. This paper focuses on one specific aspect of participatory processes and the concrete arrangements through which they are carried out, more specifically: how such processes always come to enact some actors as 'legitimately concerned' stakeholders and others not. Such investigations bring into focus context-specific effects of inclusion and …

  • Swimming upstream

    Open Access•Milena Arias Schreiber, Ida Wingren et al.•ARTICLE•Sustainability Science•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    The EU Blue Growth agenda is being implemented at a time when European coastal fisheries and traditional fishing communities are struggling to survive or have already vanished from areas where they used to flourish. Driven by the strong conviction that current disadvantaged and vulnerable coastal fishers still have a central role to play in rural development, local level initiatives are calling for a different future for this fishery sector. The …

  • More than just a carding system

    Open Access•Alin Kadfak, Sebastian Linke•ARTICLE•Marine Policy•2021

    Globally, the EU plays a leading role in combating illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing activities. Specifically, the EU exercises normative power to influence regulatory strategies and governing frameworks in third countries. In 2015, the EU issued Thailand a yellow card, indicating that economic sanctions would be implemented unless IUU fishing practices were eliminated. Concurrently, revelations about ‘modern slavery’ in Thailand’…

  • Close but not too close’ – experiences of science-policy bridging in three international advisory organizations

    Open Access•Matteo De Donà, Sebastian Linke•ARTICLE•Critical Policy Studies•2022•References: 26

    The role of science in environmental decision-making calls for an improved understanding of how scientific advice can best inform policy. Policy-relevant science is trapped in the conundrum of being close to policy and politics while trying not to become too close, to avoid politicization. We investigate this dilemma in three scientific advisory organizations: the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES), the Intergovernmental …

  • Roles for advisory science in the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (Ices)

    Open Access•Sebastian Linke, Kåre Nolde Nielsen et al.•ARTICLE•Marine Policy•2023

    What role should science take when providing advice in support of policy and politics? Should a provider of science-based advice have its own position on the issues it provides advise on? Or should it be as impartial as possible from the value and policy context of the advice? This theme, long debated, gained new attention in fisheries and marine governance. Starting from theoretical concepts and stylised models, this study attends to a theory-pr…

  • Navigating dilemmas with formalization of advisory processes

    Open Access•Kåre Nolde Nielsen, Sebastian Linke et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2024•References: 5

    Formalization is an important aspect of the provision of scientific advice, which has received limited scholarly attention, and needs further conceptualization. Drawing on Adler and Bory’s distinction between enabling and coercive formalization, we analyze advisory processes in a boundary organization. We do so with a case study of the provision of annual fisheries advice by the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES). Based o…

  • Making Science Relevant

    Open Access•Göran Sundqvist, Sebastian Linke•ARTICLE•Minerva•2024•Cited by: 4•References: 5

    This article compares two science advisory organizations: the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) and the International Council for the Exploration of the Seas (ICES), with a special focus on how their respective policy systems absorb the knowledge delivered for use in decision processes. The science-policy processes of these two organizations differ in important respects; ICES delivers highly specified knowledge to a specified upta…

  • Aligning top-down and bottom-up modes of governance? How EU Fisheries Local Action Groups support small-scale fisheries and coastal community development in Sweden

    Open Access•Sebastian Linke, Nathan Siegrist•ARTICLE•Sociologia Ruralis•2024•Cited by: 3•References: 44

    Small-scale fisheries and coastal communities experienced dramatic downward trends over recent decades impacting rural development on European coastlines. Fisheries governance in the European Union (EU) follows exogenous top-down regulations steering fishing practices through detailed regulations. In contrast, the EU's structural funding system of Fisheries Local Action Groups (FLAGs) involves an endogenous approach consisting of more participato…

  • Fisheries local action groups, small-scale fisheries and territorial development

    Open Access•Jeremy Phillipson, Pekka Salmi et al.•ARTICLE•Sociologia Ruralis•2024•Cited by: 1•References: 29

    In comparison to the wealth of critical evaluation of LEADER (i.e., Liaison entre actions de développement de l'économie rurale), there has been no consolidated attempt to reflect on the contribution of Fisheries Local Action Groups (FLAGs), now entering their third EU programming period. Set up in the image of LEADER, and a novel governance instrument within the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), FLAGs aim to activate local responses that build resi…

Political science (13 works) · Coastal and Marine Management (8 works) · Corporate governance (8 works) · Business (7 works) · Economics (7 works) · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (7 works) · Public relations (6 works) · Fisheries management (5 works) · Fishing (5 works) · Geography (5 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae