Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Undo Uus

Biographic Data

ID373920
NAMEUndo Uus
GIVEN NAMESUndo
FAMILY NAMEUus
SIGNATUREUUS U
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS3
TOTAL CITATIONS1
AUTHOR COUNT3
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1997
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2003
H-INDEX1
  • Teadus ja tavauskumused

    Open Access•Undo Uus•ARTICLE•Mäetagused•2003•References: 1

    Modern science is extremely sceptical towards the dilemma of God's existence. Which side of the argument might prove right in this historical confrontation - the one based on traditional religions and folk perceptions or that based on modern doctrines of science? Given the present-day level of human knowledge and reasoning - to what extent can we know whether God exists or not? In trying to answer the question about God's possible existence it mi…

  • Science and Folk Sentiments

    Open Access•Undo Uus•ARTICLE•Folklore Electronic Journal of…•2000

    It is generally believed that traditional or commonsense beliefs that contradict scientific views must recede. I will argue that such an opinion is not always justified. In particular, I claim that the mod-ern scientific notion of the fundamental nature of the world and life may very likely prove to be false, whereas some relevant “unscien-tific ” folk sentiments may prove to be essentially correct. Science and traditional common sense, which bot…

  • The Blindness of Modern Science

    T L S Sprigge, Undo Uus•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1997•Cited by: 1

  • The Blindness of Modern Science

    T L S Sprigge, Undo Uus•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1997•Cited by: 1

  • The Blindness of Modern Science

    T L S Sprigge, Undo Uus•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1997•Cited by: 1

  • Science and Folk Sentiments

    Open Access•Undo Uus•ARTICLE•Folklore Electronic Journal of…•2000

    It is generally believed that traditional or commonsense beliefs that contradict scientific views must recede. I will argue that such an opinion is not always justified. In particular, I claim that the mod-ern scientific notion of the fundamental nature of the world and life may very likely prove to be false, whereas some relevant “unscien-tific ” folk sentiments may prove to be essentially correct. Science and traditional common sense, which bot…

  • Teadus ja tavauskumused

    Open Access•Undo Uus•ARTICLE•Mäetagused•2003•References: 1

    Modern science is extremely sceptical towards the dilemma of God's existence. Which side of the argument might prove right in this historical confrontation - the one based on traditional religions and folk perceptions or that based on modern doctrines of science? Given the present-day level of human knowledge and reasoning - to what extent can we know whether God exists or not? In trying to answer the question about God's possible existence it mi…

Medicine (2 works) · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (1 work) · Archaeology (1 work) · Blindness (1 work) · Cognitive science (1 work) · Folklore (1 work) · Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (1 work) · Historical Philosophy and Science (1 work) · History (1 work) · Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae