Mark Parry
Biographic Data
| ID | 3766153 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Mark Parry |
| GIVEN NAMES | Mark |
| FAMILY NAME | Parry |
| SIGNATURE | PARRY M |
| AFFILIATIONS | Oundle School |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2015 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2017 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
William Laud and the Parliamentary Politics of 1628–9
This article seeks to highlight the important part played by Bishop William Laud in the counsels of Charles I in the 1620s, and, in particular, his involvement in the parliamentary sessions of 1628 and 1629. Having demonstrated his usefulness as a parliamentary spokesman for the crown in the parliaments of 1625 and 1626, and having been promoted to the privy council, the parliament of 1628–9 witnessed the height of Laud's parliamentary engagement…
The Bishops and the Duke of Buckingham, 1624–1626
This article seeks to demonstrate the political activism of the bishops, particularly through their role in the House of Lords, and the extent to which they were polarized by their attitudes to the royal favourite, the duke of Buckingham. Buckingham himself was as divisive a force among the episcopate as he was among the laity, and it will be argued here that the anti‐Calvinists, conscious of the favourite's support of them as a patron, went to g…
Bishop William Laud and the parliament of 1626: Laud and the parliament of 1626
Journal Article Bishop William Laud and the parliament of 1626 Get access Mark Parry Mark Parry Oundle School Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Historical Research, Volume 88, Issue 240, May 2015, Pages 230–248, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2281.12097 Published: 15 April 2015
The Bishops and the Duke of Buckingham, 1624–1626
This article seeks to demonstrate the political activism of the bishops, particularly through their role in the House of Lords, and the extent to which they were polarized by their attitudes to the royal favourite, the duke of Buckingham. Buckingham himself was as divisive a force among the episcopate as he was among the laity, and it will be argued here that the anti‐Calvinists, conscious of the favourite's support of them as a patron, went to g…
The Bishops and the Duke of Buckingham, 1624–1626
This article seeks to demonstrate the political activism of the bishops, particularly through their role in the House of Lords, and the extent to which they were polarized by their attitudes to the royal favourite, the duke of Buckingham. Buckingham himself was as divisive a force among the episcopate as he was among the laity, and it will be argued here that the anti‐Calvinists, conscious of the favourite's support of them as a patron, went to g…
Bishop William Laud and the parliament of 1626: Laud and the parliament of 1626
Journal Article Bishop William Laud and the parliament of 1626 Get access Mark Parry Mark Parry Oundle School Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Historical Research, Volume 88, Issue 240, May 2015, Pages 230–248, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2281.12097 Published: 15 April 2015
William Laud and the Parliamentary Politics of 1628–9
This article seeks to highlight the important part played by Bishop William Laud in the counsels of Charles I in the 1620s, and, in particular, his involvement in the parliamentary sessions of 1628 and 1629. Having demonstrated his usefulness as a parliamentary spokesman for the crown in the parliaments of 1625 and 1626, and having been promoted to the privy council, the parliament of 1628–9 witnessed the height of Laud's parliamentary engagement…
Law (3 works) · Parliament (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Politics (3 works) · Scottish History and National Identity (3 works) · Buckingham (2 works) · Historical Studies of British Isles (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Media studies (2 works) · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 works)