Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Terence Holden

Biographic Data

ID3768273
NAMETerence Holden
GIVEN NAMESTerence
FAMILY NAMEHolden
SIGNATUREHOLDEN T
AFFILIATIONSBogaziçi University, Istanbul
ORCID0000-0002-4311-9103
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS5
TOTAL CITATIONS3
AUTHOR COUNT5
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2016
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2020
H-INDEX1
  • Normative reconstruction and social memory: Honneth and Ricoeur

    Open Access•Terence Holden•ARTICLE•Man and World•2020

  • Levinas Between Recognition and Heterology

    Terence Holden•ARTICLE•Critical Horizons•2019•References: 2

    I extract a problematic from Levinas’ shifting attitude towards the idea of recognition. An underappreciated aspect of Levinas’ work is that at an early stage he appeals to a recognition-based model of intersubjectivity, which characteristically plots a relation of mutual affirmation between individuals. However, he later explicitly rejects this paradigm in favour of an intensified heterological orientation which invests in otherness as a value i…

  • Hartog, Koselleck, and Ricoeur: Historical Anthropology and the Crisis of the Present

    Open Access•Terence Holden•ARTICLE•History and Theory•2019•Cited by: 3

    I enquire here into whether historical anthropology may serve to orient the critique of modes of temporalization under the conditions specific to what François Hartog designates as the contemporary regime of historicity. To this end, I bring Hartog into conversation with Paul Ricoeur: both arrive at a diagnosis of the crisis of the present on the basis of a parallel interiorization of the metahistorical categories of Reinhart Koselleck. Sharing a…

  • Adorno and Arendt

    Terence Holden•ARTICLE•New German Critique•2019•References: 7

    Through a comparative analysis of their diagnosis of radical evil with the divergent ways in which Theodor W. Adorno and Hannah Arendt register and respond to the exhaustion of the modern regime of historicity, this article employs the terminology of historical anthropology as developed by Reinhart Koselleck and François Hartog. It proceeds to a retrospective reconstruction of the fashion in which both thinkers stand between the modern and contem…

  • Honneth, Kojeve and Levinas on intersubjectivity and history

    Open Access•Terence Holden•ARTICLE•Man and World•2016

  • Hartog, Koselleck, and Ricoeur: Historical Anthropology and the Crisis of the Present

    Open Access•Terence Holden•ARTICLE•History and Theory•2019•Cited by: 3

    I enquire here into whether historical anthropology may serve to orient the critique of modes of temporalization under the conditions specific to what François Hartog designates as the contemporary regime of historicity. To this end, I bring Hartog into conversation with Paul Ricoeur: both arrive at a diagnosis of the crisis of the present on the basis of a parallel interiorization of the metahistorical categories of Reinhart Koselleck. Sharing a…

  • Honneth, Kojeve and Levinas on intersubjectivity and history

    Open Access•Terence Holden•ARTICLE•Man and World•2016

  • Levinas Between Recognition and Heterology

    Terence Holden•ARTICLE•Critical Horizons•2019•References: 2

    I extract a problematic from Levinas’ shifting attitude towards the idea of recognition. An underappreciated aspect of Levinas’ work is that at an early stage he appeals to a recognition-based model of intersubjectivity, which characteristically plots a relation of mutual affirmation between individuals. However, he later explicitly rejects this paradigm in favour of an intensified heterological orientation which invests in otherness as a value i…

  • Hartog, Koselleck, and Ricoeur: Historical Anthropology and the Crisis of the Present

    Open Access•Terence Holden•ARTICLE•History and Theory•2019•Cited by: 3

    I enquire here into whether historical anthropology may serve to orient the critique of modes of temporalization under the conditions specific to what François Hartog designates as the contemporary regime of historicity. To this end, I bring Hartog into conversation with Paul Ricoeur: both arrive at a diagnosis of the crisis of the present on the basis of a parallel interiorization of the metahistorical categories of Reinhart Koselleck. Sharing a…

  • Adorno and Arendt

    Terence Holden•ARTICLE•New German Critique•2019•References: 7

    Through a comparative analysis of their diagnosis of radical evil with the divergent ways in which Theodor W. Adorno and Hannah Arendt register and respond to the exhaustion of the modern regime of historicity, this article employs the terminology of historical anthropology as developed by Reinhart Koselleck and François Hartog. It proceeds to a retrospective reconstruction of the fashion in which both thinkers stand between the modern and contem…

  • Normative reconstruction and social memory: Honneth and Ricoeur

    Open Access•Terence Holden•ARTICLE•Man and World•2020

Epistemology (5 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Sociology (5 works) · Law (4 works) · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy (2 works) · Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (2 works) · Historicity (philosophy) (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae