Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

David Marshall Miller

Biographic Data

ID3768802
NAMEDavid Marshall Miller
GIVEN NAMESDavid Marshall
FAMILY NAMEMiller
SIGNATUREMILLER D M
AFFILIATIONSWhitney Humanities Center, Yale University
ORCID0000-0001-5547-7285
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS6
TOTAL CITATIONS6
WORKS AS AUTHOR5
WORKS AS EDITOR1
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2008
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2022
H-INDEX1
  • The Cambridge History of Philosophy of the Scientific Revolution

    Open Access•David Marshall Miller, Dana Jalobeanu•EDITOR•BOOK•Cambridge History of Philosophy…•2022

    The early modern era produced the Scientific Revolution, which originated our present understanding of the natural world. Concurrently, philosophers established the conceptual foundations of modernity. This rich and comprehensive volume surveys and illuminates the numerous and complicated interconnections between philosophical and scientific thought as both were radically transformed from the late sixteenth to the mid-eighteenth century. The chap…

  • Cambridge History of Philosophy of the Scientific Revolution

    Dana Jalobeanu, David Marshall Miller•BOOK•Cambridge History of Philosophy…•2022

  • Galileo’s impractical science

    Open Access•David Marshall Miller•ARTICLE•Metascience•2012

  • Friedman, Galileo, and Reciprocal Iteration

    Open Access•David Marshall Miller•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2011•References: 4

    In Dynamics of Reason , Michael Friedman uses the example of Galilean rectilinear inertia to support his defense of scientific rationality against postpositivist skepticism. However, Friedman's treatment of the case is flawed, such that his model of scientific change fails to fit the historical evidence. I present the case of Galileo, showing how it supports Friedman's view of scientific knowledge but undermines his view of scientific change. I t…

  • Qualities, Properties, and Laws in Newton's Induction

    Open Access•David Marshall Miller•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2009•Cited by: 6•References: 7

    Newton's argument for universal gravitation in the Principia eventually rested on the third “Rule of Philosophizing,” which warrants the generalization of “qualities of bodies.” An analysis of the rule and the history of its development indicate that the term ‘quality’ should be taken to include both inherent properties of bodies and relations among systems of bodies, generalized into ‘laws'. By incorporating law-induction into the rule, Newton c…

  • The Thirty Years War and the Galileo Affair

    Open Access•David Marshall Miller•ARTICLE•History of Science•2008•References: 6

  • Qualities, Properties, and Laws in Newton's Induction

    Open Access•David Marshall Miller•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2009•Cited by: 6•References: 7

    Newton's argument for universal gravitation in the Principia eventually rested on the third “Rule of Philosophizing,” which warrants the generalization of “qualities of bodies.” An analysis of the rule and the history of its development indicate that the term ‘quality’ should be taken to include both inherent properties of bodies and relations among systems of bodies, generalized into ‘laws'. By incorporating law-induction into the rule, Newton c…

  • The Thirty Years War and the Galileo Affair

    Open Access•David Marshall Miller•ARTICLE•History of Science•2008•References: 6

  • Qualities, Properties, and Laws in Newton's Induction

    Open Access•David Marshall Miller•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2009•Cited by: 6•References: 7

    Newton's argument for universal gravitation in the Principia eventually rested on the third “Rule of Philosophizing,” which warrants the generalization of “qualities of bodies.” An analysis of the rule and the history of its development indicate that the term ‘quality’ should be taken to include both inherent properties of bodies and relations among systems of bodies, generalized into ‘laws'. By incorporating law-induction into the rule, Newton c…

  • Friedman, Galileo, and Reciprocal Iteration

    Open Access•David Marshall Miller•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•2011•References: 4

    In Dynamics of Reason , Michael Friedman uses the example of Galilean rectilinear inertia to support his defense of scientific rationality against postpositivist skepticism. However, Friedman's treatment of the case is flawed, such that his model of scientific change fails to fit the historical evidence. I present the case of Galileo, showing how it supports Friedman's view of scientific knowledge but undermines his view of scientific change. I t…

  • Galileo’s impractical science

    Open Access•David Marshall Miller•ARTICLE•Metascience•2012

  • The Cambridge History of Philosophy of the Scientific Revolution

    Open Access•David Marshall Miller, Dana Jalobeanu•EDITOR•BOOK•Cambridge History of Philosophy…•2022

    The early modern era produced the Scientific Revolution, which originated our present understanding of the natural world. Concurrently, philosophers established the conceptual foundations of modernity. This rich and comprehensive volume surveys and illuminates the numerous and complicated interconnections between philosophical and scientific thought as both were radically transformed from the late sixteenth to the mid-eighteenth century. The chap…

  • Cambridge History of Philosophy of the Scientific Revolution

    Dana Jalobeanu, David Marshall Miller•BOOK•Cambridge History of Philosophy…•2022

Philosophy (5 works) · Epistemology (4 works) · History of Science and Medicine (4 works) · Environmental ethics (2 works) · Galileo (satellite navigation) (2 works) · Geodesy (2 works) · Geography (2 works) · History (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Political science (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae