Slgi S Lee
Biographic Data
| ID | 3771540 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Slgi S Lee |
| GIVEN NAMES | Slgi S |
| FAMILY NAME | Lee |
| SIGNATURE | LEE S S |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Michigan |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-5525-7936 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 7 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 103 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 7 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2017 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| H-INDEX | 4 |
Permanent connectedness and its impact on news sharing
The ubiquitous use of Internet-connected media enables individuals to stay in constant touch with personal contacts in an “always-on” society. Consequently, some individuals have developed the habit of being permanently connected with others through digital media. This article examines the psychological and political consequences of permanent connectedness. Analysis of two independent sets of data collected via a two-wave panel survey and an onli…
The Impact of Social Endorsement Cues and Manipulability Concerns on Perceptions of News Credibility
Social endorsement cues (SEC) offer information about how online users have engaged and evaluated online content. Some view that SEC thus can serve as useful heuristics when users evaluate the credibility of news content on social media. At the same time, SEC can be manipulated by a variety of commercial and political actors on social media. This study examines whether SEC influence individuals' credibility judgments of political news on social m…
Now We’re Talking? Understanding the Interplay Between Online Selective and Incidental Exposure and Their Influence on Online Cross-Cutting Political Discussion
This study examines how two distinct patterns of online political information exposure—pro-attitudinal selective exposure and counter-attitudinal incidental exposure—can work together to influence engagement in online cross-cutting political discussion. Using panel data from a two-wave national survey conducted in 2012, we test two competing theoretical accounts. Findings suggest that incidental exposure affects selective exposure’s contribution …
When Social Media Get Political
The use of social media for developing and maintaining relationships can offer a gateway for users to open up and express their political views. Building on previous literature on the 'spillover effect' in which relational use of social media motivates political expression, this study examines the circumstances under which the 'spillover' effect is more likely to occur. To do so, we measured respondents' (a) dialogic openness and (b) perception o…
Perceptions of Social Media for Politics
Americans' views of political activity on social media range from exuberant to exasperated. But do perceptions of social media actually influence citizens' online and offline political behaviors as suggested by the so-called "Slacktivism hypothesis?" In the present study, we undertake a more careful examination of this question by testing a theoretical model in which perceiving participation on social media as an easy or impactful means of engagi…
Incidental Exposure, Selective Exposure, and Political Information Sharing
Political information sharing in social media offers citizens opportunities to engage with news and express their political views, but how do different patterns of online political information exposure, including both incidental and selective exposure, affect sharing? Using two-wave panel survey data collected in the United States, we examine the relationship between incidental and selective exposure and their consequent links to political inform…
From Online Disagreement to Offline Action
Amid growing concerns over the contentious tenor of online political discourse, scholars have begun to recognize that the social contexts and affordances provided by social media may present indirect pathways from online political discussion to offline political participation. Less work has addressed how users' motivations for using social media might influence such dynamics. In this study, we use two-wave panel survey data collected in the Unite…
Incidental Exposure, Selective Exposure, and Political Information Sharing
Political information sharing in social media offers citizens opportunities to engage with news and express their political views, but how do different patterns of online political information exposure, including both incidental and selective exposure, affect sharing? Using two-wave panel survey data collected in the United States, we examine the relationship between incidental and selective exposure and their consequent links to political inform…
Perceptions of Social Media for Politics
Americans' views of political activity on social media range from exuberant to exasperated. But do perceptions of social media actually influence citizens' online and offline political behaviors as suggested by the so-called "Slacktivism hypothesis?" In the present study, we undertake a more careful examination of this question by testing a theoretical model in which perceiving participation on social media as an easy or impactful means of engagi…
Now We’re Talking? Understanding the Interplay Between Online Selective and Incidental Exposure and Their Influence on Online Cross-Cutting Political Discussion
This study examines how two distinct patterns of online political information exposure—pro-attitudinal selective exposure and counter-attitudinal incidental exposure—can work together to influence engagement in online cross-cutting political discussion. Using panel data from a two-wave national survey conducted in 2012, we test two competing theoretical accounts. Findings suggest that incidental exposure affects selective exposure’s contribution …
From Online Disagreement to Offline Action
Amid growing concerns over the contentious tenor of online political discourse, scholars have begun to recognize that the social contexts and affordances provided by social media may present indirect pathways from online political discussion to offline political participation. Less work has addressed how users' motivations for using social media might influence such dynamics. In this study, we use two-wave panel survey data collected in the Unite…
Incidental Exposure, Selective Exposure, and Political Information Sharing
Political information sharing in social media offers citizens opportunities to engage with news and express their political views, but how do different patterns of online political information exposure, including both incidental and selective exposure, affect sharing? Using two-wave panel survey data collected in the United States, we examine the relationship between incidental and selective exposure and their consequent links to political inform…
From Online Disagreement to Offline Action
Amid growing concerns over the contentious tenor of online political discourse, scholars have begun to recognize that the social contexts and affordances provided by social media may present indirect pathways from online political discussion to offline political participation. Less work has addressed how users' motivations for using social media might influence such dynamics. In this study, we use two-wave panel survey data collected in the Unite…
Perceptions of Social Media for Politics
Americans' views of political activity on social media range from exuberant to exasperated. But do perceptions of social media actually influence citizens' online and offline political behaviors as suggested by the so-called "Slacktivism hypothesis?" In the present study, we undertake a more careful examination of this question by testing a theoretical model in which perceiving participation on social media as an easy or impactful means of engagi…
Now We’re Talking? Understanding the Interplay Between Online Selective and Incidental Exposure and Their Influence on Online Cross-Cutting Political Discussion
This study examines how two distinct patterns of online political information exposure—pro-attitudinal selective exposure and counter-attitudinal incidental exposure—can work together to influence engagement in online cross-cutting political discussion. Using panel data from a two-wave national survey conducted in 2012, we test two competing theoretical accounts. Findings suggest that incidental exposure affects selective exposure’s contribution …
When Social Media Get Political
The use of social media for developing and maintaining relationships can offer a gateway for users to open up and express their political views. Building on previous literature on the 'spillover effect' in which relational use of social media motivates political expression, this study examines the circumstances under which the 'spillover' effect is more likely to occur. To do so, we measured respondents' (a) dialogic openness and (b) perception o…
The Impact of Social Endorsement Cues and Manipulability Concerns on Perceptions of News Credibility
Social endorsement cues (SEC) offer information about how online users have engaged and evaluated online content. Some view that SEC thus can serve as useful heuristics when users evaluate the credibility of news content on social media. At the same time, SEC can be manipulated by a variety of commercial and political actors on social media. This study examines whether SEC influence individuals' credibility judgments of political news on social m…
Permanent connectedness and its impact on news sharing
The ubiquitous use of Internet-connected media enables individuals to stay in constant touch with personal contacts in an “always-on” society. Consequently, some individuals have developed the habit of being permanently connected with others through digital media. This article examines the psychological and political consequences of permanent connectedness. Analysis of two independent sets of data collected via a two-wave panel survey and an onli…
Political science (7 works) · Politics (7 works) · Psychology (7 works) · Social Media and Politics (7 works) · Social Psychology (6 works) · Computer Science (4 works) · Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 works) · Perception (4 works) · Social media (4 works) · Social Psychology (4 works)