Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Brian Dowd‐uribe

Biographic Data

ID3789441
NAMEBrian Dowd‐uribe
GIVEN NAMESBrian
FAMILY NAMEDowd‐uribe
SIGNATUREURIBE B D
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of San Francisco
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS10
TOTAL CITATIONS102
AUTHOR COUNT10
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2011
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2023
H-INDEX6
  • Just agricultural science: The green revolution, biotechnologies, and marginalized farmers in Africa

    Open Access•Brian Dowd-Uribe, Brian Dowd‐uribe•ARTICLE•Elementa Science of the…•2023

    Contemporary agricultural development has changed in significant ways since the green revolution (GR). Its goals have expanded beyond national development to the achievement of environmental and social goals, and, notably, targeted gains for marginalized farmers. Moreover, advances in molecular breeding have expanded the tools used to achieve such goals. This research examines a prominent agricultural biotechnology program, pest resistant (Bt) co…

  • Anticipating farmer outcomes of three genetically modified staple crops in sub-Saharan Africa: Insights from farming systems research

    Open Access•Matthew A Schnurr, Brian Dowd-Uribe et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Rural Studies•2021•Cited by: 3•References: 16

  • Knowledge politics and the Bt cotton success narrative in Burkina Faso

    Open Access•Jessie K Luna, Brian Dowd-Uribe et al.•ARTICLE•World Development•2020•Cited by: 15•References: 23

  • Weaving cotton-led development? Liberalization, cotton producer organizations, and uneven development in Burkina Faso

    Open Access•Leslie C Gray, Brian Dowd‐uribe et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Agrarian Change•2018•Cited by: 6•References: 29

    This article argues that the politics of scale in a nested hierarchy of cotton governance institutions in Burkina Faso are weighted against smaller producers, with what looks like success from a broader scale producing uneven development at the local scale. We show that at the national level, Burkina Faso has succeeded in increasing its output of cotton lint. At the local level, we see a differentiated outcome where the liberalization-initiated s…

  • GMOs and poverty: Definitions, methods and the silver bullet paradox

    Brian Dowd-Uribe, Brian Dowd‐uribe•ARTICLE•Canadian Journal of Development…•2017•Cited by: 4•References: 20

    The question of whether genetically modified (GM) crops can help the poor is of urgent importance yet difficult to answer. This essay identifies two problem areas: methodology and implementation. Given the extraordinary diversity of both GM crops and poor populations, it is perhaps better to ask “Which poor could a specific GM crop benefit, and how?” Most GM crop analyses use narrow indicators over short time scales and neglect key variables such…

  • Briefing: Burkina Faso's reversal on genetically modified cotton and the implications for Africa

    Brian Dowd-Uribe, Brian Dowd‐uribe et al.•ARTICLE•African Affairs•2016•Cited by: 7

    Can Genetically Modified (GM) crops help smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa? To date, only two GM crops – insect-resistant forms of cotton and maize – have made it into the hands of African farmers. Of these, GM cotton has the longest empirical track record, having been the first GM crop ever introduced in Africa, and the only one that has been grown in multiple countries – first South Africa, then Burkina Faso.1 The performance of this cr…

  • Engineering yields and inequality? How institutions and agro-ecology shape Bt cotton outcomes in Burkina Faso

    Open Access•Brian Dowd-Uribe, Brian Dowd‐uribe•ARTICLE•Geoforum•2013•Cited by: 20•References: 4

  • Seeds and places: The geographies of transgenic crops in the global south

    Open Access•Brian Dowd-Uribe, Brian Dowd‐uribe et al.•ARTICLE•Geoforum•2013•Cited by: 6•References: 13

  • A political ecology of socio-economic differentiation: Debt, inputs and liberalization reforms in southwestern Burkina Faso

    Leslie C Gray, Leslie Gray et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2013•Cited by: 39•References: 25

    This paper builds on work from the agrarian change and political ecology literatures to analyze the process of agrarian change among smallholder cotton farmers in southwestern Burkina Faso. Specifically, we use a rural survey of 72 heads of household in three villages to examine whether and how (1) access to agricultural inputs, (2) debt and (3) liberalization reforms combine to produce rural socio-economic differentiation based on wealth. We fin…

  • Debating the merits of biotech crop adoption in sub-Saharan Africa: Distributional Impacts, Climatic Variability and Pest Dynamics

    Open Access•Brian Dowd‐uribe, Brian M Dowd-Uribe et al.•ARTICLE•Progress in Development Studies•2011•Cited by: 2•References: 2

    The debate on whether genetically engineered (GE) crops can alleviate poverty in Africa continues to intensify. Thus far only one GE crop has been commercialized among smallholders – a pest resistant form of cotton – and only in two sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries. We present evidence from Burkina Faso to argue that GE cotton adoption may increase the risk of all producers, may only bring benefits in the short term and may only benefit the re…

  • A political ecology of socio-economic differentiation: Debt, inputs and liberalization reforms in southwestern Burkina Faso

    Leslie C Gray, Leslie Gray et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2013•Cited by: 39•References: 25

    This paper builds on work from the agrarian change and political ecology literatures to analyze the process of agrarian change among smallholder cotton farmers in southwestern Burkina Faso. Specifically, we use a rural survey of 72 heads of household in three villages to examine whether and how (1) access to agricultural inputs, (2) debt and (3) liberalization reforms combine to produce rural socio-economic differentiation based on wealth. We fin…

  • Engineering yields and inequality? How institutions and agro-ecology shape Bt cotton outcomes in Burkina Faso

    Open Access•Brian Dowd-Uribe, Brian Dowd‐uribe•ARTICLE•Geoforum•2013•Cited by: 20•References: 4

  • Knowledge politics and the Bt cotton success narrative in Burkina Faso

    Open Access•Jessie K Luna, Brian Dowd-Uribe et al.•ARTICLE•World Development•2020•Cited by: 15•References: 23

  • Briefing: Burkina Faso's reversal on genetically modified cotton and the implications for Africa

    Brian Dowd-Uribe, Brian Dowd‐uribe et al.•ARTICLE•African Affairs•2016•Cited by: 7

    Can Genetically Modified (GM) crops help smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa? To date, only two GM crops – insect-resistant forms of cotton and maize – have made it into the hands of African farmers. Of these, GM cotton has the longest empirical track record, having been the first GM crop ever introduced in Africa, and the only one that has been grown in multiple countries – first South Africa, then Burkina Faso.1 The performance of this cr…

  • Weaving cotton-led development? Liberalization, cotton producer organizations, and uneven development in Burkina Faso

    Open Access•Leslie C Gray, Brian Dowd‐uribe et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Agrarian Change•2018•Cited by: 6•References: 29

    This article argues that the politics of scale in a nested hierarchy of cotton governance institutions in Burkina Faso are weighted against smaller producers, with what looks like success from a broader scale producing uneven development at the local scale. We show that at the national level, Burkina Faso has succeeded in increasing its output of cotton lint. At the local level, we see a differentiated outcome where the liberalization-initiated s…

  • Seeds and places: The geographies of transgenic crops in the global south

    Open Access•Brian Dowd-Uribe, Brian Dowd‐uribe et al.•ARTICLE•Geoforum•2013•Cited by: 6•References: 13

  • GMOs and poverty: Definitions, methods and the silver bullet paradox

    Brian Dowd-Uribe, Brian Dowd‐uribe•ARTICLE•Canadian Journal of Development…•2017•Cited by: 4•References: 20

    The question of whether genetically modified (GM) crops can help the poor is of urgent importance yet difficult to answer. This essay identifies two problem areas: methodology and implementation. Given the extraordinary diversity of both GM crops and poor populations, it is perhaps better to ask “Which poor could a specific GM crop benefit, and how?” Most GM crop analyses use narrow indicators over short time scales and neglect key variables such…

  • Anticipating farmer outcomes of three genetically modified staple crops in sub-Saharan Africa: Insights from farming systems research

    Open Access•Matthew A Schnurr, Brian Dowd-Uribe et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Rural Studies•2021•Cited by: 3•References: 16

  • Debating the merits of biotech crop adoption in sub-Saharan Africa: Distributional Impacts, Climatic Variability and Pest Dynamics

    Open Access•Brian Dowd‐uribe, Brian M Dowd-Uribe et al.•ARTICLE•Progress in Development Studies•2011•Cited by: 2•References: 2

    The debate on whether genetically engineered (GE) crops can alleviate poverty in Africa continues to intensify. Thus far only one GE crop has been commercialized among smallholders – a pest resistant form of cotton – and only in two sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries. We present evidence from Burkina Faso to argue that GE cotton adoption may increase the risk of all producers, may only bring benefits in the short term and may only benefit the re…

  • Debating the merits of biotech crop adoption in sub-Saharan Africa: Distributional Impacts, Climatic Variability and Pest Dynamics

    Open Access•Brian Dowd‐uribe, Brian M Dowd-Uribe et al.•ARTICLE•Progress in Development Studies•2011•Cited by: 2•References: 2

    The debate on whether genetically engineered (GE) crops can alleviate poverty in Africa continues to intensify. Thus far only one GE crop has been commercialized among smallholders – a pest resistant form of cotton – and only in two sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries. We present evidence from Burkina Faso to argue that GE cotton adoption may increase the risk of all producers, may only bring benefits in the short term and may only benefit the re…

  • Engineering yields and inequality? How institutions and agro-ecology shape Bt cotton outcomes in Burkina Faso

    Open Access•Brian Dowd-Uribe, Brian Dowd‐uribe•ARTICLE•Geoforum•2013•Cited by: 20•References: 4

  • Seeds and places: The geographies of transgenic crops in the global south

    Open Access•Brian Dowd-Uribe, Brian Dowd‐uribe et al.•ARTICLE•Geoforum•2013•Cited by: 6•References: 13

  • A political ecology of socio-economic differentiation: Debt, inputs and liberalization reforms in southwestern Burkina Faso

    Leslie C Gray, Leslie Gray et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2013•Cited by: 39•References: 25

    This paper builds on work from the agrarian change and political ecology literatures to analyze the process of agrarian change among smallholder cotton farmers in southwestern Burkina Faso. Specifically, we use a rural survey of 72 heads of household in three villages to examine whether and how (1) access to agricultural inputs, (2) debt and (3) liberalization reforms combine to produce rural socio-economic differentiation based on wealth. We fin…

  • Briefing: Burkina Faso's reversal on genetically modified cotton and the implications for Africa

    Brian Dowd-Uribe, Brian Dowd‐uribe et al.•ARTICLE•African Affairs•2016•Cited by: 7

    Can Genetically Modified (GM) crops help smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa? To date, only two GM crops – insect-resistant forms of cotton and maize – have made it into the hands of African farmers. Of these, GM cotton has the longest empirical track record, having been the first GM crop ever introduced in Africa, and the only one that has been grown in multiple countries – first South Africa, then Burkina Faso.1 The performance of this cr…

  • GMOs and poverty: Definitions, methods and the silver bullet paradox

    Brian Dowd-Uribe, Brian Dowd‐uribe•ARTICLE•Canadian Journal of Development…•2017•Cited by: 4•References: 20

    The question of whether genetically modified (GM) crops can help the poor is of urgent importance yet difficult to answer. This essay identifies two problem areas: methodology and implementation. Given the extraordinary diversity of both GM crops and poor populations, it is perhaps better to ask “Which poor could a specific GM crop benefit, and how?” Most GM crop analyses use narrow indicators over short time scales and neglect key variables such…

  • Weaving cotton-led development? Liberalization, cotton producer organizations, and uneven development in Burkina Faso

    Open Access•Leslie C Gray, Brian Dowd‐uribe et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Agrarian Change•2018•Cited by: 6•References: 29

    This article argues that the politics of scale in a nested hierarchy of cotton governance institutions in Burkina Faso are weighted against smaller producers, with what looks like success from a broader scale producing uneven development at the local scale. We show that at the national level, Burkina Faso has succeeded in increasing its output of cotton lint. At the local level, we see a differentiated outcome where the liberalization-initiated s…

  • Knowledge politics and the Bt cotton success narrative in Burkina Faso

    Open Access•Jessie K Luna, Brian Dowd-Uribe et al.•ARTICLE•World Development•2020•Cited by: 15•References: 23

  • Anticipating farmer outcomes of three genetically modified staple crops in sub-Saharan Africa: Insights from farming systems research

    Open Access•Matthew A Schnurr, Brian Dowd-Uribe et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Rural Studies•2021•Cited by: 3•References: 16

  • Just agricultural science: The green revolution, biotechnologies, and marginalized farmers in Africa

    Open Access•Brian Dowd-Uribe, Brian Dowd‐uribe•ARTICLE•Elementa Science of the…•2023

    Contemporary agricultural development has changed in significant ways since the green revolution (GR). Its goals have expanded beyond national development to the achievement of environmental and social goals, and, notably, targeted gains for marginalized farmers. Moreover, advances in molecular breeding have expanded the tools used to achieve such goals. This research examines a prominent agricultural biotechnology program, pest resistant (Bt) co…

Economics (10 works) · Geography (8 works) · Biology (7 works) · Genetically Modified Organisms Research (7 works) · Business (6 works) · Political science (6 works) · Agricultural economics (5 works) · CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (5 works) · Sociology (5 works) · Agricultural Innovations and Practices (4 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae