Jane C Peters
Biographic Data
| ID | 380110 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Jane C Peters |
| GIVEN NAMES | Jane C |
| FAMILY NAME | Peters |
| SIGNATURE | PETERS J C |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Kentucky |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 13 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2003 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2008 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Modeling the Decision to Undergo Colorectal Cancer Screening
BACKGROUND: Little is known about how patients decide whether or not to undergo colorectal cancer screening. Although low screening rates evidence the outcome of these decisions, the processes patients use to balance benefits, risks, and costs with their own values and preferences are unclear. To increase screening rates, and ultimately save lives, it is important for providers to be aware of how patients make screening decisions. OBJECTIVES: The…
Do We Really Need All That Equipment
The lifetime risk of developing colorectal cancer is 2.5 to 5% in the general population. Colorectal screening can prevent mortality, and there are a number of screening methods, ranging from noninvasive to highly invasive. Although recommendations have been widely disseminated in the media and scientific journals, screening usage is low. In this project, the authors examine the factors that influence individuals' decisions regarding colorectal s…
Unraveling the mysteries of timing
Unraveling the mysteries of timing
Do We Really Need All That Equipment
The lifetime risk of developing colorectal cancer is 2.5 to 5% in the general population. Colorectal screening can prevent mortality, and there are a number of screening methods, ranging from noninvasive to highly invasive. Although recommendations have been widely disseminated in the media and scientific journals, screening usage is low. In this project, the authors examine the factors that influence individuals' decisions regarding colorectal s…
Unraveling the mysteries of timing
Do We Really Need All That Equipment
The lifetime risk of developing colorectal cancer is 2.5 to 5% in the general population. Colorectal screening can prevent mortality, and there are a number of screening methods, ranging from noninvasive to highly invasive. Although recommendations have been widely disseminated in the media and scientific journals, screening usage is low. In this project, the authors examine the factors that influence individuals' decisions regarding colorectal s…
Modeling the Decision to Undergo Colorectal Cancer Screening
BACKGROUND: Little is known about how patients decide whether or not to undergo colorectal cancer screening. Although low screening rates evidence the outcome of these decisions, the processes patients use to balance benefits, risks, and costs with their own values and preferences are unclear. To increase screening rates, and ultimately save lives, it is important for providers to be aware of how patients make screening decisions. OBJECTIVES: The…
Medicine (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Cancer (2 works) · Colonoscopy (2 works) · Colorectal cancer (2 works) · Colorectal cancer screening (2 works) · Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 works) · Environmental health (2 works) · Family medicine (2 works) · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 works)