Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

James T Townsend

Biographic Data

ID3821574
NAMEJames T Townsend
GIVEN NAMESJames T
FAMILY NAMETownsend
SIGNATURETOWNSEND J T
AFFILIATIONSIndiana University Bloomington
ORCID0000-0002-1715-0588
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS14
TOTAL CITATIONS7
AUTHOR COUNT13
EDITOR COUNT1
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1983
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2015
H-INDEX2
  • Information Processing Architectures: Fundamental Issues

    Open Access•James T Townsend, Haiyuan Yang et al.•CHAPTER•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • The Oxford Handbook of Computational and Mathematical Psychology

    Jerome R Busemeyer, Zheng Wang et al.•BOOK•Oxford Handbook of Computational…•2015

    A comprehensive and authoritative review on most important developments in computational and mathematical psychology that have impacted many other fields in past decades. Written in tutorial style by leading scientists in each topic area, with an emphasis on examples and applications. Each chapter is self-contained and aims to engage readers with various levels of modeling experience. The Handbook covers the key developments in elementary cogniti…

  • Oxford Handbook of Computational and Mathematical Psychology

    Jerome R Busemeyer, Zheng Wang et al.•BOOK•Oxford Handbook of Computational…•2015

    A comprehensive, authoritative review of historical and recent developments in computational and mathematical psychology. Written in an accessible style by leading scientists in each topic area, with an emphasis on examples and applications. Each chapter is self contained and aims to engage readers possessing various levels of modeling experience. For graduate students, researchers, and scholars studying brain science and related fields

  • Diagonal d′ does not (always) diagnose failure of separability: An addendum to Kingston, Diehl, Kirk, and Castleman (2008)

    Open Access•Noah H Silbert, Kenneth J De Jong et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Phonetics•2009•References: 10

  • Multialternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionst model of decision making.

    Robert M Roe, Jermone R Busemeyer et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Review•2001

    The authors interpret decision field theory (J. R. Busemeyer & J. T. Townsend, 1993) as a connectionist network and extend it to accommodate multialternative preferential choice situations. This article shows that the classic weighted additive utility model (see R. L. Keeney & H. Raiffa, 1976) and the classic Thurstone preferential choice model (see L. L. Thurstone, 1959) are special cases of this new multialternative decision field theory (MDFT)…

  • Exploring the relations between categorization and decision making with regard to realistic face stimuli

    James T Townsend, Kam M Silva et al.•ARTICLE•Pragmatics & Cognition•2000

    Categorization and decision making are combined in a task with photorealistic faces. Two different types of face stimuli were assigned probabilistically into one of two fictitious groups; based on the category, faces were further probabilistically assigned to be hostile or friendly. In Part I, participants are asked to categorize a face into one of two categories, and to make a decision concerning interaction. A Markov model of categorization fol…

  • Basic Response Time Tools for Studying General Processing Capacity in Attention, Perception, and Cognition

    Michael J Wenger, James T Townsend•ARTICLE•The Journal of General Psychology•2000

    One of the more important constructs in the study of attention, perception, and cognition is that of capacity. The authors reviewed some of the common meanings of this construct and proposed a more precise treatment. They showed how the distribution of response times can be used to derive measures of process capacity and to further illustrate how these measures can be used to address important hypotheses in cognition

  • Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment.

    Jerome R Busemeyer, James T Townsend•ARTICLE•Psychological Review•1993

    Decision field theory provides for a mathematical foundation leading to a dynamic, stochastic theory of decision behavior in an uncertain environment. This theory is used to explain (a) violations of stochastic dominance, (b) violations of strong stochastic transitivity, (c) violations of independence between alternatives, (d) serial position effects on preference, (e) speed-accuracy trade-off effects in decision making, (f) the inverse relation …

  • Chinese Nationalism

    James Townsend, James T Townsend•ARTICLE•The Australian Journal of Chinese…•1992

  • Fundamental derivations from decision field theory

    Open Access•Jerome R Busemeyer, James T Townsend•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•1992•Cited by: 3•References: 12

  • Truth and consequences of ordinal differences in statistical distributions: Toward a theory of hierarchical inference

    James T Townsend•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•1990

    A theory is presented that establishes a dominance hierarchy of potential distinctions (order relations) between two distributions. It is proposed that it is worthwhile for researchers to ascertain the strongest possible distinction, because all weaker distinctions are logically implied. Implications of the theory for hypothesis testing, theory construction, and scales of measurement are considered. Open problems for future research are outlined

  • Truth and consequences of ordinal differences in statistical distributions: Toward a theory of hierarchical inference

    James T Townsend•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•1990

  • Measurement scales and statistics: The misconception misconceived

    James T Townsend, F Gregory Ashby•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•1984•Cited by: 3

  • Mathematical models of recognition and confusion in psychology

    Open Access•James T Townsend, Douglas E Landon•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•1983•Cited by: 1•References: 37

  • Fundamental derivations from decision field theory

    Open Access•Jerome R Busemeyer, James T Townsend•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•1992•Cited by: 3•References: 12

  • Measurement scales and statistics: The misconception misconceived

    James T Townsend, F Gregory Ashby•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•1984•Cited by: 3

  • Mathematical models of recognition and confusion in psychology

    Open Access•James T Townsend, Douglas E Landon•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•1983•Cited by: 1•References: 37

  • Mathematical models of recognition and confusion in psychology

    Open Access•James T Townsend, Douglas E Landon•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•1983•Cited by: 1•References: 37

  • Measurement scales and statistics: The misconception misconceived

    James T Townsend, F Gregory Ashby•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•1984•Cited by: 3

  • Truth and consequences of ordinal differences in statistical distributions: Toward a theory of hierarchical inference

    James T Townsend•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•1990

    A theory is presented that establishes a dominance hierarchy of potential distinctions (order relations) between two distributions. It is proposed that it is worthwhile for researchers to ascertain the strongest possible distinction, because all weaker distinctions are logically implied. Implications of the theory for hypothesis testing, theory construction, and scales of measurement are considered. Open problems for future research are outlined

  • Truth and consequences of ordinal differences in statistical distributions: Toward a theory of hierarchical inference

    James T Townsend•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•1990

  • Chinese Nationalism

    James Townsend, James T Townsend•ARTICLE•The Australian Journal of Chinese…•1992

  • Fundamental derivations from decision field theory

    Open Access•Jerome R Busemeyer, James T Townsend•ARTICLE•Mathematical Social Sciences•1992•Cited by: 3•References: 12

  • Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment.

    Jerome R Busemeyer, James T Townsend•ARTICLE•Psychological Review•1993

    Decision field theory provides for a mathematical foundation leading to a dynamic, stochastic theory of decision behavior in an uncertain environment. This theory is used to explain (a) violations of stochastic dominance, (b) violations of strong stochastic transitivity, (c) violations of independence between alternatives, (d) serial position effects on preference, (e) speed-accuracy trade-off effects in decision making, (f) the inverse relation …

  • Exploring the relations between categorization and decision making with regard to realistic face stimuli

    James T Townsend, Kam M Silva et al.•ARTICLE•Pragmatics & Cognition•2000

    Categorization and decision making are combined in a task with photorealistic faces. Two different types of face stimuli were assigned probabilistically into one of two fictitious groups; based on the category, faces were further probabilistically assigned to be hostile or friendly. In Part I, participants are asked to categorize a face into one of two categories, and to make a decision concerning interaction. A Markov model of categorization fol…

  • Basic Response Time Tools for Studying General Processing Capacity in Attention, Perception, and Cognition

    Michael J Wenger, James T Townsend•ARTICLE•The Journal of General Psychology•2000

    One of the more important constructs in the study of attention, perception, and cognition is that of capacity. The authors reviewed some of the common meanings of this construct and proposed a more precise treatment. They showed how the distribution of response times can be used to derive measures of process capacity and to further illustrate how these measures can be used to address important hypotheses in cognition

  • Multialternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionst model of decision making.

    Robert M Roe, Jermone R Busemeyer et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Review•2001

    The authors interpret decision field theory (J. R. Busemeyer & J. T. Townsend, 1993) as a connectionist network and extend it to accommodate multialternative preferential choice situations. This article shows that the classic weighted additive utility model (see R. L. Keeney & H. Raiffa, 1976) and the classic Thurstone preferential choice model (see L. L. Thurstone, 1959) are special cases of this new multialternative decision field theory (MDFT)…

  • Diagonal d′ does not (always) diagnose failure of separability: An addendum to Kingston, Diehl, Kirk, and Castleman (2008)

    Open Access•Noah H Silbert, Kenneth J De Jong et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Phonetics•2009•References: 10

  • Information Processing Architectures: Fundamental Issues

    Open Access•James T Townsend, Haiyuan Yang et al.•CHAPTER•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • The Oxford Handbook of Computational and Mathematical Psychology

    Jerome R Busemeyer, Zheng Wang et al.•BOOK•Oxford Handbook of Computational…•2015

    A comprehensive and authoritative review on most important developments in computational and mathematical psychology that have impacted many other fields in past decades. Written in tutorial style by leading scientists in each topic area, with an emphasis on examples and applications. Each chapter is self-contained and aims to engage readers with various levels of modeling experience. The Handbook covers the key developments in elementary cogniti…

  • Oxford Handbook of Computational and Mathematical Psychology

    Jerome R Busemeyer, Zheng Wang et al.•BOOK•Oxford Handbook of Computational…•2015

    A comprehensive, authoritative review of historical and recent developments in computational and mathematical psychology. Written in an accessible style by leading scientists in each topic area, with an emphasis on examples and applications. Each chapter is self contained and aims to engage readers possessing various levels of modeling experience. For graduate students, researchers, and scholars studying brain science and related fields

Psychology (12 works) · Computer Science (11 works) · Mathematics (8 works) · Statistics (8 works) · Cognitive psychology (7 works) · Artificial Intelligence (6 works) · Econometrics (6 works) · Cognitive science (5 works) · Perception (4 works) · Artificial Intelligence (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae