John G Kemeny
Biographic Data
| ID | 382160 |
|---|---|
| NAME | John G Kemeny |
| GIVEN NAMES | John G |
| FAMILY NAME | Kemeny |
| SIGNATURE | KEMENY J G |
| AFFILIATIONS | Dartmouth College |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 10 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 55 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 10 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1952 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1981 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
Political fallout
Man and the Computer
Introduction to Finite Mathematics
Analyticity versus fuzziness
A philosopher looks at political science
and, therefore, the greater the differences may be between predictions of the 297 This content downloaded from 207.46.13.142 on Fri, 10 Jun 2016 05:51:32 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Systematic Power
In 1948 Hempel and Oppenheim proposed an explicatum for the concept of systematic power 1, pp. 164–167. Since that time some shortcomings have been found in this first attempt. It is the purpose of this paper to show that one can keep the basic approach of the ‘48 paper, and overcome the known disadvantages by means of changes in the details of the definition. In this improvement certain tools will be used that were not available in 1948
A Treatise on Induction and Probability
The Use of Simplicity in Induction
A Contribution to Inductive Logic
Degree of Factual Support
We wish to give a precise formulation of the intuitive concept: The degree to which the known facts (the evidence) support a given hypothesis
Degree of Factual Support
We wish to give a precise formulation of the intuitive concept: The degree to which the known facts (the evidence) support a given hypothesis
The Use of Simplicity in Induction
Introduction to Finite Mathematics
A philosopher looks at political science
and, therefore, the greater the differences may be between predictions of the 297 This content downloaded from 207.46.13.142 on Fri, 10 Jun 2016 05:51:32 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Systematic Power
In 1948 Hempel and Oppenheim proposed an explicatum for the concept of systematic power 1, pp. 164–167. Since that time some shortcomings have been found in this first attempt. It is the purpose of this paper to show that one can keep the basic approach of the ‘48 paper, and overcome the known disadvantages by means of changes in the details of the definition. In this improvement certain tools will be used that were not available in 1948
A Contribution to Inductive Logic
Degree of Factual Support
We wish to give a precise formulation of the intuitive concept: The degree to which the known facts (the evidence) support a given hypothesis
A Treatise on Induction and Probability
The Use of Simplicity in Induction
A Contribution to Inductive Logic
Systematic Power
In 1948 Hempel and Oppenheim proposed an explicatum for the concept of systematic power 1, pp. 164–167. Since that time some shortcomings have been found in this first attempt. It is the purpose of this paper to show that one can keep the basic approach of the ‘48 paper, and overcome the known disadvantages by means of changes in the details of the definition. In this improvement certain tools will be used that were not available in 1948
A philosopher looks at political science
and, therefore, the greater the differences may be between predictions of the 297 This content downloaded from 207.46.13.142 on Fri, 10 Jun 2016 05:51:32 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Analyticity versus fuzziness
Introduction to Finite Mathematics
Man and the Computer
Political fallout
Epistemology (7 works) · Philosophy (7 works) · Computer Science (4 works) · Medicine (4 works) · Calculus (dental) (3 works) · Mathematics (3 works) · Philosophy and History of Science (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (2 works) · Law (2 works)