Hunter Hatfield
Biographic Data
| ID | 3824158 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Hunter Hatfield |
| GIVEN NAMES | Hunter |
| FAMILY NAME | Hatfield |
| SIGNATURE | HATFIELD H |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Otago |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 20 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 5 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2011 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2017 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
An athletes [sic] performance
If we believe social media, newspapers, and even some of our best friends and colleagues, the war over standard usage is on. As with many wars, the opposing sides seem to be entrenched in differing ideological positions and many of the battles seem to take place over the most unstable, smallest bits of territory - such as the Oxford comma, singular they , or split infinitives. In this ongoing war, possessive apostrophes have attracted particularl…
Self-Guided Reading
The face of others
The concept of group face has been used to explain facework thatrelates to members of in-groups. Hahn and Hatfield (2011) looked at situationsin which a family member of a Speaker commits a possible offense towards aHearer. They tested the prediction that collectivist Koreans would apologize forthe family member at a greater rate than individualist Americans who wouldbe focused upon individual face not group face. This prediction was not confirme…
Group face in Korea and the United States
Brown and Levinson's ([1978] Politeness: Some universals in language use, Cambridge University Press, 1987) politeness theory has been criticized as being ethnocentric by displaying a Western preoccupation with autonomy and individualism. Many non-western societies, it is argued, are better understood by appealing to cultural discernment or group face. Whether or not this is a fair criticism of Brown and Levinson, is it a fair understanding of We…
What Korean apologies require of politeness theory
What Korean apologies require of politeness theory
Group face in Korea and the United States
Brown and Levinson's ([1978] Politeness: Some universals in language use, Cambridge University Press, 1987) politeness theory has been criticized as being ethnocentric by displaying a Western preoccupation with autonomy and individualism. Many non-western societies, it is argued, are better understood by appealing to cultural discernment or group face. Whether or not this is a fair criticism of Brown and Levinson, is it a fair understanding of We…
The face of others
The concept of group face has been used to explain facework thatrelates to members of in-groups. Hahn and Hatfield (2011) looked at situationsin which a family member of a Speaker commits a possible offense towards aHearer. They tested the prediction that collectivist Koreans would apologize forthe family member at a greater rate than individualist Americans who wouldbe focused upon individual face not group face. This prediction was not confirme…
Group face in Korea and the United States
Brown and Levinson's ([1978] Politeness: Some universals in language use, Cambridge University Press, 1987) politeness theory has been criticized as being ethnocentric by displaying a Western preoccupation with autonomy and individualism. Many non-western societies, it is argued, are better understood by appealing to cultural discernment or group face. Whether or not this is a fair criticism of Brown and Levinson, is it a fair understanding of We…
What Korean apologies require of politeness theory
The face of others
The concept of group face has been used to explain facework thatrelates to members of in-groups. Hahn and Hatfield (2011) looked at situationsin which a family member of a Speaker commits a possible offense towards aHearer. They tested the prediction that collectivist Koreans would apologize forthe family member at a greater rate than individualist Americans who wouldbe focused upon individual face not group face. This prediction was not confirme…
Self-Guided Reading
An athletes [sic] performance
If we believe social media, newspapers, and even some of our best friends and colleagues, the war over standard usage is on. As with many wars, the opposing sides seem to be entrenched in differing ideological positions and many of the battles seem to take place over the most unstable, smallest bits of territory - such as the Oxford comma, singular they , or split infinitives. In this ongoing war, possessive apostrophes have attracted particularl…
Linguistics (5 works) · Law (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Psychology (4 works) · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Politeness (3 works) · Social Psychology (3 works) · Social Psychology (3 works) · Artificial Intelligence (2 works)