Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Thomas Schubert

Biographic Data

ID3826853
NAMEThomas Schubert
GIVEN NAMESThomas
FAMILY NAMESchubert
SIGNATURESCHUBERT T
AFFILIATIONSForsthaus Nordtor 14476 Potsdam Deutschland
ORCID0000-0001-6670-886X
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS6
TOTAL CITATIONS7
AUTHOR COUNT6
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2001
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2020
H-INDEX2
  • Buchbesprechungen

    Open Access•Manès Weisskircher, Thomas Schubert et al.•ARTICLE•Totalitarismus und Demokratie•2020

  • Politik in Sachsen

    Eckhard Jesse, Thomas Schubert et al.•BOOK•Politik in Sachsen•2013

  • When different means bad or merely worse. How minimal and maximal goals affect ingroup projection and outgroup attitudes

    Open Access•Anne Berthold, Amélie Mummendey et al.•ARTICLE•European Journal of Social…•2012•Cited by: 4•References: 23

    Group members tend to perceive their ingroup relative to an outgroup as more prototypical for a common superordinate group because they project features of their ingroup onto the superordinate group. As a consequence, the ingroup is perceived as more positive than the outgroup (Mummendey & Wenzel, 1999). We extend the ingroup projection model by examining different types of ingroup goals: minimal and maximal goals as well as actual and ideal goal…

  • Wahlkampf in Sachsen: Eine Qualitative längsschnittanalyse der Landtagswahlkämpfe 1990-2004

    Open Access•Thomas Schubert•BOOK•Wahlkampf in Sachsen•2011

  • The contexts and structures of relating to others: How memberships in different types of groups shape the construction of interpersonal relationships

    Open Access•Rodrigo Brito, Sven Waldzu et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Social and Personal…•2011•Cited by: 3•References: 39

    A study tested hypotheses derived from relational models theory on how four models - communal sharing, authority ranking, equality matching, and market pricing - are used to structure relationships in different types of social groupings. Portuguese participants rated 10 relationships on the Modes of Relationships Questionnaire and reported their shared group memberships. The four-factor structure of the models was confirmed, and a bottom-up appro…

  • The Experience of Presence: Factor Analytic Insights

    Thomas W Schubert, Thomas Schubert et al.•ARTICLE•PRESENCE Virtual and Augmented…•2001

    Within an embodied cognition framework, it is argued that presence in a virtual environment (VE) develops from the construction of a spatial-functional mental model of the VE. Two cognitive processes lead to this model: the representation of bodily actions as possible actions in the VE, and the suppression of incompatible sensory input. It is hypothesized that the conscious sense of presence reflects these two components as spatial presence and i…

  • When different means bad or merely worse. How minimal and maximal goals affect ingroup projection and outgroup attitudes

    Open Access•Anne Berthold, Amélie Mummendey et al.•ARTICLE•European Journal of Social…•2012•Cited by: 4•References: 23

    Group members tend to perceive their ingroup relative to an outgroup as more prototypical for a common superordinate group because they project features of their ingroup onto the superordinate group. As a consequence, the ingroup is perceived as more positive than the outgroup (Mummendey & Wenzel, 1999). We extend the ingroup projection model by examining different types of ingroup goals: minimal and maximal goals as well as actual and ideal goal…

  • The contexts and structures of relating to others: How memberships in different types of groups shape the construction of interpersonal relationships

    Open Access•Rodrigo Brito, Sven Waldzu et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Social and Personal…•2011•Cited by: 3•References: 39

    A study tested hypotheses derived from relational models theory on how four models - communal sharing, authority ranking, equality matching, and market pricing - are used to structure relationships in different types of social groupings. Portuguese participants rated 10 relationships on the Modes of Relationships Questionnaire and reported their shared group memberships. The four-factor structure of the models was confirmed, and a bottom-up appro…

  • The Experience of Presence: Factor Analytic Insights

    Thomas W Schubert, Thomas Schubert et al.•ARTICLE•PRESENCE Virtual and Augmented…•2001

    Within an embodied cognition framework, it is argued that presence in a virtual environment (VE) develops from the construction of a spatial-functional mental model of the VE. Two cognitive processes lead to this model: the representation of bodily actions as possible actions in the VE, and the suppression of incompatible sensory input. It is hypothesized that the conscious sense of presence reflects these two components as spatial presence and i…

  • Wahlkampf in Sachsen: Eine Qualitative längsschnittanalyse der Landtagswahlkämpfe 1990-2004

    Open Access•Thomas Schubert•BOOK•Wahlkampf in Sachsen•2011

  • The contexts and structures of relating to others: How memberships in different types of groups shape the construction of interpersonal relationships

    Open Access•Rodrigo Brito, Sven Waldzu et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Social and Personal…•2011•Cited by: 3•References: 39

    A study tested hypotheses derived from relational models theory on how four models - communal sharing, authority ranking, equality matching, and market pricing - are used to structure relationships in different types of social groupings. Portuguese participants rated 10 relationships on the Modes of Relationships Questionnaire and reported their shared group memberships. The four-factor structure of the models was confirmed, and a bottom-up appro…

  • When different means bad or merely worse. How minimal and maximal goals affect ingroup projection and outgroup attitudes

    Open Access•Anne Berthold, Amélie Mummendey et al.•ARTICLE•European Journal of Social…•2012•Cited by: 4•References: 23

    Group members tend to perceive their ingroup relative to an outgroup as more prototypical for a common superordinate group because they project features of their ingroup onto the superordinate group. As a consequence, the ingroup is perceived as more positive than the outgroup (Mummendey & Wenzel, 1999). We extend the ingroup projection model by examining different types of ingroup goals: minimal and maximal goals as well as actual and ideal goal…

  • Politik in Sachsen

    Eckhard Jesse, Thomas Schubert et al.•BOOK•Politik in Sachsen•2013

  • Buchbesprechungen

    Open Access•Manès Weisskircher, Thomas Schubert et al.•ARTICLE•Totalitarismus und Demokratie•2020

Psychology (3 works) · Social Psychology (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Cultural Differences and Values (2 works) · Mathematics (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 works) · Action Observation and Synchronization (1 works) · Affect (linguistics) (1 works) · Art (1 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae