Patrik Hummel

Biographic Data

ID382932
NAMEPatrik Hummel
GIVEN NAMESPatrik
FAMILY NAMEHummel
SIGNATUREHUMMEL P
AFFILIATIONSEindhoven University of Technology
ORCID0000-0001-9668-0810
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS10
TOTAL CITATIONS14
AUTHOR COUNT10
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2020
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX1

  • Meaningful Human Control over AI for Health? A Review

    Open AccessEva Maria Hille, Patrik Hummel et al.ARTICLEJournal of Medical Ethics2026

    Artificial intelligence is currently changing many areas of society. Especially in health, where critical decisions are made, questions of control must be renegotiated: who is in control when an automated system makes clinically relevant decisions? Increasingly, the concept of meaningful human control (MHC) is being invoked for this purpose. However, it is unclear exactly how this concept is to be understood in health. Through a systematic review…

  • Is digital sovereignty normatively desirable

    Open AccessMatthias Braun, Patrik HummelARTICLEInformation Communication & Society2025

    Sovereignty is a frequently used term when it comes to analyzing and shaping digital processes and transformations.For example, digital sovereignty has become a central concept in European politics in recent years.In this article, we argue that references to digital sovereignty have largely operated with an implausibly one-dimensional, overly simplified notion of sovereignty in general and its application to the digital in particular.We explore t…

  • Perspectives of patients and clinicians on big data and AI in health: A comparative empirical investigation

    Open AccessPatrik Hummel, Matthias Braun et al.ARTICLEAI & Society2024

  • Contested Spatialities of Digital Sovereignty

    Open AccessG Glasze, Amaël Cattaruzza et al.ARTICLEGeopolitics2023Cited by: 13References: 51

    “Digital sovereignty” has become a buzzword in digital policies. Contrary to the imaginary of digital transformation as preceding an era of limitless global networking in the 1990s, approaches to state regulation and delimitation of data flows as well as programmes for national digital infrastructures are justified with calls for digital sovereignty across very different contexts. This forum brings together contributions from political geography,…

  • Evaluation of a clinical decision support system for detection of patients at risk after kidney transplantation

    Open AccessRoland Roller, Manuel Mayrdorfer et al.ARTICLEFrontiers in Public Health2022

    Patient care after kidney transplantation requires integration of complex information to make informed decisions on risk constellations. Many machine learning models have been developed for detecting patient outcomes in the past years. However, performance metrics alone do not determine practical utility. We present a newly developed clinical decision support system (CDSS) for detection of patients at risk for rejection and death-censored graft f…

  • Primer on an ethics of AI-based decision support systems in the clinic

    Open AccessMatthias Braun, Patrik Hummel et al.ARTICLEJournal of Medical Ethics2021

    Making good decisions in extremely complex and difficult processes and situations has always been both a key task as well as a challenge in the clinic and has led to a large amount of clinical, legal and ethical routines, protocols and reflections in order to guarantee fair, participatory and up-to-date pathways for clinical decision-making. Nevertheless, the complexity of processes and physical phenomena, time as well as economic constraints and…

  • A Leap of Faith: Is There a Formula for “Trustworthy” AI

    Open AccessMatthias Braun, Hannah Bleher et al.ARTICLEThe Hastings Center Report2021

    Trust is one of the big buzzwords in debates about the shaping of society, democracy, and emerging technologies. For example, one prominent idea put forward by the High‐Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence appointed by the European Commission is that artificial intelligence should be trustworthy. In this essay, we explore the notion of trust and argue that both proponents and critics of trustworthy AI have flawed pictures of the nature o…

  • Own Data? Ethical Reflections on Data Ownership

    Open AccessPatrik Hummel, Matthias Braun et al.ARTICLEPhilosophy & Technology2021

    In discourses on digitization and the data economy, it is often claimed that data subjects shall be owners of their data. In this paper, we provide a problem diagnosis for such calls for data ownership : a large variety of demands are discussed under this heading. It thus becomes challenging to specify what—if anything—unites them. We identify four conceptual dimensions of calls for data ownership and argue that these help to systematize and to c…

  • Data sovereignty: A review

    Open AccessPatrik Hummel, Matthias Braun et al.ARTICLEBig Data & Society2021

    New data-driven technologies yield benefits and potentials, but also confront different agents and stakeholders with challenges in retaining control over their data. Our goal in this study is to arrive at a clear picture of what is meant by data sovereignty in such problem settings. To this end, we review 341 publications and analyze the frequency of different notions such as data sovereignty, digital sovereignty, and cyber sovereignty. We go on …

  • Just data? Solidarity and justice in data-driven medicine

    Open AccessPatrik Hummel, Matthias BraunARTICLELife Sciences Society and Policy2020Cited by: 1References: 49

    This paper argues that data-driven medicine gives rise to a particular normative challenge. Against the backdrop of a distinction between the good and the right , harnessing personal health data towards the development and refinement of data-driven medicine is to be welcomed from the perspective of the good . Enacting solidarity drives progress in research and clinical practice. At the same time, such acts of sharing could—especially considering …