Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Jon Parkin

Biographic Data

ID3832587
NAMEJon Parkin
GIVEN NAMESJon
FAMILY NAMEParkin
SIGNATUREPARKIN J
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of York
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS4
TOTAL CITATIONS14
AUTHOR COUNT3
EDITOR COUNT1
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1999
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2015
H-INDEX2
  • Hobbes and the Reception of Leviathan

    Jon Parkin•ARTICLE•Journal of the History of Ideas•2015

    Although there has been much discussion of the reception of Hobbes's work, Hobbes's response to his own reception has rarely received much consideration. This article looks at Hobbes's engagements with his critics. Far from being rearguard actions by a philosopher under siege, or disingenuous attempts to curry favour with those in power, they can be read as moments when Hobbes in fact sought to convert what he saw as the "truth of speculation int…

  • Natural Law And Toleration In The Early Enlightenment

    Jon Parkin, Timothy Stanton•BOOK•Natural Law And Toleration In The…•2012

  • Straw Men and Political Philosophy

    Open Access•Jon Parkin•ARTICLE•Political Studies•2011•Cited by: 5•References: 12

    This article examines the character of straw men as deployed by political and moral philosophers, using the example of politically motivated responses to the work of Thomas Hobbes. It attempts to give an Oakeshottian account of what is distinctive about the form of straw arguments within political philosophy before going on to identify some examples drawn from the reception of Hobbes' work. In the final section, discussion of the function of stra…

  • Hobbism in the Later 1660s

    Open Access•Jon Parkin•ARTICLE•The Historical Journal•1999•Cited by: 9

    Daniel Scargill and Samuel Parker have both been regarded as isolated and eccentric disciples of Thomas Hobbes. However, a detailed examination of their views reveals a more complicated relationship with the notorious philosopher. Far from being simple ‘Hobbists’, Scargill and Parker developed ideas close to those of ‘latitudinarian’ clergymen. In the polarizing political circumstances of the later 1660s, the hostile identification of their views…

  • Hobbism in the Later 1660s

    Open Access•Jon Parkin•ARTICLE•The Historical Journal•1999•Cited by: 9

    Daniel Scargill and Samuel Parker have both been regarded as isolated and eccentric disciples of Thomas Hobbes. However, a detailed examination of their views reveals a more complicated relationship with the notorious philosopher. Far from being simple ‘Hobbists’, Scargill and Parker developed ideas close to those of ‘latitudinarian’ clergymen. In the polarizing political circumstances of the later 1660s, the hostile identification of their views…

  • Straw Men and Political Philosophy

    Open Access•Jon Parkin•ARTICLE•Political Studies•2011•Cited by: 5•References: 12

    This article examines the character of straw men as deployed by political and moral philosophers, using the example of politically motivated responses to the work of Thomas Hobbes. It attempts to give an Oakeshottian account of what is distinctive about the form of straw arguments within political philosophy before going on to identify some examples drawn from the reception of Hobbes' work. In the final section, discussion of the function of stra…

  • Hobbism in the Later 1660s

    Open Access•Jon Parkin•ARTICLE•The Historical Journal•1999•Cited by: 9

    Daniel Scargill and Samuel Parker have both been regarded as isolated and eccentric disciples of Thomas Hobbes. However, a detailed examination of their views reveals a more complicated relationship with the notorious philosopher. Far from being simple ‘Hobbists’, Scargill and Parker developed ideas close to those of ‘latitudinarian’ clergymen. In the polarizing political circumstances of the later 1660s, the hostile identification of their views…

  • Straw Men and Political Philosophy

    Open Access•Jon Parkin•ARTICLE•Political Studies•2011•Cited by: 5•References: 12

    This article examines the character of straw men as deployed by political and moral philosophers, using the example of politically motivated responses to the work of Thomas Hobbes. It attempts to give an Oakeshottian account of what is distinctive about the form of straw arguments within political philosophy before going on to identify some examples drawn from the reception of Hobbes' work. In the final section, discussion of the function of stra…

  • Natural Law And Toleration In The Early Enlightenment

    Jon Parkin, Timothy Stanton•BOOK•Natural Law And Toleration In The…•2012

  • Hobbes and the Reception of Leviathan

    Jon Parkin•ARTICLE•Journal of the History of Ideas•2015

    Although there has been much discussion of the reception of Hobbes's work, Hobbes's response to his own reception has rarely received much consideration. This article looks at Hobbes's engagements with his critics. Far from being rearguard actions by a philosopher under siege, or disingenuous attempts to curry favour with those in power, they can be read as moments when Hobbes in fact sought to convert what he saw as the "truth of speculation int…

Epistemology (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Law (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Politics (3 works) · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (3 works) · American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Political philosophy (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae