Steve Chandler
Biographic Data
| ID | 3839011 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Steve Chandler |
| GIVEN NAMES | Steve |
| FAMILY NAME | Chandler |
| SIGNATURE | CHANDLER S |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Idaho |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-2140-0153 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 3 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 4 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1993 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Sentence-level constructions
Ambridge reviews and augments an impressive body of research demonstrating both the advantages and the necessity of an exemplar-based model of knowledge of one’s language. He cites three computational models that have been applied successfully to issues of phonology and morphology. Focusing on Ambridge’s discussion of sentence-level constructions, this commentary cites additional research in support of his exemplar hypothesis. It then provides an…
The English past tense
The debate over how best to characterize inflectional morphology has been couched largely in terms of the “dual-mechanism” approach described in Pinker (Words and rules: the ingredients of language, Basic Books, 1999) versus “single-mechanism” connectionist approaches derived from Rumelhart and McClelland (On learning past tenses of English verbs, MIT, 1986). There are, however, other single-mechanism approaches. The exemplar-based or analogical …
Predicting Naming Latencies with an Analogical Model
Are rules and modules really necessary for explaining language
Are rules and modules really necessary for explaining language
The English past tense
The debate over how best to characterize inflectional morphology has been couched largely in terms of the “dual-mechanism” approach described in Pinker (Words and rules: the ingredients of language, Basic Books, 1999) versus “single-mechanism” connectionist approaches derived from Rumelhart and McClelland (On learning past tenses of English verbs, MIT, 1986). There are, however, other single-mechanism approaches. The exemplar-based or analogical …
Are rules and modules really necessary for explaining language
Predicting Naming Latencies with an Analogical Model
The English past tense
The debate over how best to characterize inflectional morphology has been couched largely in terms of the “dual-mechanism” approach described in Pinker (Words and rules: the ingredients of language, Basic Books, 1999) versus “single-mechanism” connectionist approaches derived from Rumelhart and McClelland (On learning past tenses of English verbs, MIT, 1986). There are, however, other single-mechanism approaches. The exemplar-based or analogical …
Sentence-level constructions
Ambridge reviews and augments an impressive body of research demonstrating both the advantages and the necessity of an exemplar-based model of knowledge of one’s language. He cites three computational models that have been applied successfully to issues of phonology and morphology. Focusing on Ambridge’s discussion of sentence-level constructions, this commentary cites additional research in support of his exemplar hypothesis. It then provides an…
Computer Science (4 works) · Natural language processing (4 works) · Artificial Intelligence (3 works) · Cognition (3 works) · Linguistics (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Artificial Intelligence (2 works) · Child and Animal Learning Development (2 works) · Cognitive science (2 works) · Language and cultural evolution (2 works)