Angeliek Van Hout

Biographic Data

ID3850740
NAMEAngeliek Van Hout
GIVEN NAMESAngeliek
FAMILY NAMEVan Hout
SIGNATUREVAN HOUT A
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Groningen
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS10
TOTAL CITATIONS28
AUTHOR COUNT10
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1991
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2020
H-INDEX3

  • Children's non-adultlike interpretations of telic predicates across languages

    Open AccessFabienne Martins, Fabienne Martin et al.ARTICLELinguistics2020Cited by: 2References: 86

    The acquisition literature has documented several different types of misinterpretations of telic sentences by children, yet a comprehensive analysis of these child interpretations has not been attempted and a crosslinguistic perspective is lacking. This task is not easy, for, on the surface, children's non-adultlike interpretations appear to be scattered and even contradictory across languages. Several cognitive biases have been proposed to expla…

  • How do 5-year-olds understand questions? Differences in languages across Europe

    Open AccessUli Sauerland, Kleanthes K Grohmann et al.ARTICLEFirst Language2016

    The comprehension of constituent questions is an important topic for language acquisition research and for applications in the diagnosis of language impairment. This article presents the results of a study investigating the comprehension of different types of questions by 5-year-old, typically developing children across 19 European countries, 18 different languages, and 7 language (sub-)families. The study investigated the effects of two factors …

  • Development of Dutch children’s comprehension of subject and object wh -questions

    Open AccessIris Strangmann, Iris M Strangmann et al.ARTICLELinguistics in the Netherlands2014

    While Dutch welke ‘which’-questions are structurally ambiguous, number agreement cues can disambiguate them. Despite such agreement cues, children misinterpret object questions as subject questions (Metz et al. 2010, 2012; Schouwenaars et al. 2014). We investigated if adding another cue, specifically, topicality in a discourse context, helps the interpretation of which -questions in two groups of Dutch children (5;5, n = 15 and 8;5, n = 21). Usin…

  • Children’s first and second-order false-belief reasoning in a verbal and a low-verbal task

    Open AccessBart Hollebrandse, Annemarie Van Hout et al.ARTICLESynthese2014Cited by: 3References: 13

  • Passivization, reconstruction and edge phenomena

    Open AccessAnnemarie Van Hout, Angeliek Van Hout et al.ARTICLENatural Language and Linguistic…2013Cited by: 1References: 12

  • Perfective - imperfective

    Katerina Konstantzou, Annemarie Van Hout et al.ARTICLELinguistic Variation2013References: 34

    Tense morphology has been found to be cross-linguistically vulnerable in specific language impairment (SLI). Research on the development of aspect is rather limited and results are quite inconsistent; some studies suggest that aspect appears intact (Leonard et al. 2003), while others report severe deficits (Fletcher et al. 2005). The present study is the first one to examine the comprehension and production of aspectual distinctions in Greek SLI.…

  • Subject interpretation of object questions by Dutch 5-year-olds

    Open AccessMarijke Metz, Annemarie Van Hout et al.ARTICLELinguistics in the Netherlands2012

    We investigated the interpretation of Dutch wie ‘who’- and welke ‘which’-questions in Dutch 5-year-olds. In contrast to wh-questions in many languages, Dutch wh-questions are structurally ambiguous between a subject and an object reading. We used test items in which the ambiguity was resolved by number agreement. The participants (N = 20) heard a wh-question and had to choose the corresponding picture out of a set of four; this method revealed th…

  • Asymmetries in the acquisition of definite and indefinite NPs

    Open AccessAnnemarie Van Hout, Angeliek Van Hout et al.ARTICLELingua2010Cited by: 13References: 10

  • Acquiring perfectivity and telicity in Dutch, Italian and Polish

    Open AccessAnnemarie Van Hout, Angeliek Van HoutARTICLELingua2008Cited by: 9References: 7

  • Deverbal Nominalization, Object versus Event Denoting Nominals, Implications for Argument & Event Structure

    Open AccessAnnemarie Van Hout, Angeliek Van HoutARTICLELinguistics in the Netherlands1991

    Preview this article: Deverbal Nominalization, Object versus Event Denoting Nominals, Implications for Argument & Event Structure, Page 1 of 1 /docserver/preview/fulltext/avt.8.10hou-1.gif