Michael Cahn
Biographic Data
| ID | 3852238 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Michael Cahn |
| GIVEN NAMES | Michael |
| FAMILY NAME | Cahn |
| SIGNATURE | CAHN M |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Konstanz |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1987 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1991 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Entre science et littérature
Between literature and science. The two realms of literature and science have variously provoked attempts to distinguish and differentiate them. This essay argues that both should be studied as related modes of producing meaning. Rather than using the history of science as auxiliary science for the better interpreting of the literary text, it suggests that figures of thought, that are often characteristic of single sciences, offer a privileged ob…
Der Ort des rhetorischen Wissens Kunst und Natur bei Isokrates
This paper poses the question of the place of rhetoric as a discipline. It addresses the topical demand that nature, art, and exercise have to be combined by way of an analysis of Isocrates' Against the Sophists . Its thesis is that the call for a “combination” of art and nature solves the disciplinary problems of rhetoric, even though such a synthesis is in fact inconceivable. Rhetoric is not a science, and does not have access to a methodical c…
No prominent works on this page.
Der Ort des rhetorischen Wissens Kunst und Natur bei Isokrates
This paper poses the question of the place of rhetoric as a discipline. It addresses the topical demand that nature, art, and exercise have to be combined by way of an analysis of Isocrates' Against the Sophists . Its thesis is that the call for a “combination” of art and nature solves the disciplinary problems of rhetoric, even though such a synthesis is in fact inconceivable. Rhetoric is not a science, and does not have access to a methodical c…
Entre science et littérature
Between literature and science. The two realms of literature and science have variously provoked attempts to distinguish and differentiate them. This essay argues that both should be studied as related modes of producing meaning. Rather than using the history of science as auxiliary science for the better interpreting of the literary text, it suggests that figures of thought, that are often characteristic of single sciences, offer a privileged ob…
Epistemology (2 works) · Linguistics (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Art (1 work) · Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 work) · Discipline (1 work) · Historical and Literary Studies (1 work) · History of science (1 work)