Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Helen Fischer

Biographic Data

ID3862127
NAMEHelen Fischer
GIVEN NAMESHelen
FAMILY NAMEFischer
SIGNATUREFISCHER H
AFFILIATIONSHeidelberg University
ORCID0000-0001-5037-0390
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS20
TOTAL CITATIONS75
WORKS AS AUTHOR20
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2006
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX3
  • People’s Responses to Nuclear Weapons

    Open Access•Astrid Kause, Helen Fischer et al.•ARTICLE•Perspectives on Psychological…•2026

    Nuclear weapon threats are increasing and may be comparable to levels not seen since the worst periods of the Cold War. There could be value in psychologists documenting and explaining people’s responses to nuclear weapons. More than 3 decades have passed since the last major reviews of people’s responses to nuclear weapons. We thus aimed to understand how psychologists and researchers from related fields have empirically studied responses to nuc…

  • Zone‐flooding, public confusion, and signal detection theory

    Open Access•Helen Fischer, Vladimir Bojarskich et al.•ARTICLE•Political Psychology•2026•References: 41

    While historically, the aim of propaganda was to convince the public of a certain agenda, many political commentators contend that modern forms of disinformation come with a different goal in mind: To confuse, rather than convince. It is believed that to secure this goal, informational spaces are diluted, rather than dominated, a strategy termed “zone‐flooding.” The present research provides a unified psychological account of confusion that draws…

  • Making climate-sensitive health counselling acceptable for patients

    Open Access•Alina Herrmann, Claudia Quitmann et al.•ARTICLE•The Lancet Planetary Health•2025

  • Public Communication about Science in 68 Countries

    Open Access•Niels G Mede, Viktoria Cologna et al.•ARTICLE•Science Communication•2025•References: 11

    This 68-country survey ( n = 71,922) examines science information diets and communication behavior, identifies cross-country differences, and tests how such differences are associated with sociopolitical and economic conditions. We find that social media are the most used sources of science information in most countries, except those with democratic-corporatist media systems where news media tend to be used more widely. People in collectivist soc…

  • Acceptability of health-only versus climate-and-health framings in lifestyle-related climate-sensitive health counselling

    Open Access•Alina Herrmann, Nicola Krippl et al.•ARTICLE•The Lancet Planetary Health•2025•Cited by: 1•References: 5

    Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg

  • Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries

    Open Access•Viktoria Cologna, Niels G Mede et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2025•Cited by: 7•References: 76

    Science is crucial for evidence-based decision-making. Public trust in scientists can help decision makers act on the basis of the best available evidence, especially during crises. However, in recent years the epistemic authority of science has been challenged, causing concerns about low public trust in scientists. We interrogated these concerns with a preregistered 68-country survey of 71,922 respondents and found that in most countries, most p…

  • Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor

    Open Access•Dawn Liu Holford, Angelo Fasce et al.•ARTICLE•Science Communication•2023•Cited by: 1•References: 35

    Effective science communication is challenging when scientific messages are informed by a continually updating evidence base and must often compete against misinformation. We argue that we need a new program of science communication as collective intelligence—a collaborative approach, supported by technology. This would have four key advantages over the typical model where scientists communicate as individuals: scientific messages would be inform…

  • Contested science

    Open Access•Nadia Said, Helen Fischer et al.•ARTICLE•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2022

    Societal polarization over contested science has increased in recent years. To explain this development, political, sociological, and psychological research has identified societal macro-phenomena as well as cognitive micro-level factors that explain how citizens reason about the science. Here we take a radically different perspective, and highlight the effects of metacognition: How citizens reason about their own reasoning. Leveraging methods fr…

  • Polarized climate change beliefs

    Helen Fischer, Markus Huff et al.•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•2022

    A substantial literature shows that public polarization over climate change in the U.S. is most pronounced among the science literate. A dominant explanation for this phenomenon is that science literacy amplifies motivated reasoning, the tendency to interpret evidence such that it confirms prior beliefs. The present study tests the biasing account of science literacy in a study among the U.S. population that investigated both interpretation of cl…

  • Importance of domain-specific metacognition for explaining beliefs about politicized science

    Open Access•Helen Fischer, Nadia Said•ARTICLE•Cognition•2021

  • Extrapolation accuracy underestimates rule learning

    Open Access•Nadia Said, Helen Fischer•ARTICLE•Acta Psychologica•2021

    Understanding the development of non-linear processes such as economic or population growth is an important prerequisite for informed decisions in those areas. In the function-learning paradigm, people's understanding of the function rule that underlies the to-be predicted process is typically measured by means of extrapolation accuracy. Here we argue, however, that even though accurate extrapolation necessitates rule-learning, the reverse does n…

  • When IPCC graphs can foster or bias understanding

    Open Access•Helen Fischer, Karlijn L Van Den Broek et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Research Letters•2020

    To develop effective climate change policy, decision-makers need to have the best possible understanding of the available climate science. The IPCC Assessment Reports therefore aim to lay the foundation for informed political decision-making by providing policy-relevant information. But how successful are IPCC reports at communicating key findings? Although IPCC reports display key information in graphs, the interpretation of such graphs has rece…

  • It starts at home? Climate policies targeting household consumption and behavioral decisions are key to low-carbon futures

    Open Access•Ghislain Dubois, B K Sovacool et al.•ARTICLE•Energy Research & Social Science•2019•Cited by: 61•References: 16

    Through their consumption behavior, households are responsible for 72% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Thus, they are key actors in reaching the 1.5 °C goal under the Paris Agreement. However, the possible contribution and position of households in climate policies is neither well understood, nor do households receive sufficiently high priority in current climate policy strategies. This paper investigates how behavioral change can achieve a s…

  • Human health as a motivator for climate change mitigation

    Open Access•Dorothee Amelung, Helen Fischer et al.•ARTICLE•Global Environmental Change•2019•Cited by: 4•References: 1

  • The 2018 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change

    Open Access•Nick Watts, Markus Amann et al.•ARTICLE•The Lancet•2018

  • Promoting health under the Paris Climate Agreement – results from a European mixed-methods study

    Open Access•Alina Herrmann, D Amelung et al.•ARTICLE•European Journal of Public Health•2018

  • How Well Do COP22 Attendees Understand Graphs on Climate Change Health Impacts from the Fifth IPCC Assessment Report

    Open Access•Helen Fischer, Stefanie Schütte et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of…•2018

    Graphs are prevalent in the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), often depicting key points and major results. However, the popularity of graphs in the IPCC reports contrasts with a neglect of empirical tests of their understandability. Here we put the understandability of three graphs taken from the Health chapter of the Fifth Assessment Report to an empirical test. We present a pilot study where we evaluate objective…

  • Explaining climate policies’ popularity—An empirical study in four European countries

    Open Access•Fabio Bothner, Florian Dorner et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2018•Cited by: 1•References: 10

  • Household preferences for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in four European high-income countries

    Open Access•Alina Herrmann, Helen Fischer et al.•ARTICLE•BMC Public Health•2017

    This is one of the first comprehensive mixed-methods approaches to investigate which mitigation measures households are most willing to implement in order to reach the 1,5° target set by the Paris Agreement, and whether health co-benefits can serve as a motivator for households to implement these measures. The comparison of the empirical data with current climate policies will provide knowledge for tailoring effective climate change mitigation an…

  • Les dessous de l'amour romantique

    Helen Fischer•ARTICLE•Sciences Humaines•2006

  • It starts at home? Climate policies targeting household consumption and behavioral decisions are key to low-carbon futures

    Open Access•Ghislain Dubois, B K Sovacool et al.•ARTICLE•Energy Research & Social Science•2019•Cited by: 61•References: 16

    Through their consumption behavior, households are responsible for 72% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Thus, they are key actors in reaching the 1.5 °C goal under the Paris Agreement. However, the possible contribution and position of households in climate policies is neither well understood, nor do households receive sufficiently high priority in current climate policy strategies. This paper investigates how behavioral change can achieve a s…

  • Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries

    Open Access•Viktoria Cologna, Niels G Mede et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2025•Cited by: 7•References: 76

    Science is crucial for evidence-based decision-making. Public trust in scientists can help decision makers act on the basis of the best available evidence, especially during crises. However, in recent years the epistemic authority of science has been challenged, causing concerns about low public trust in scientists. We interrogated these concerns with a preregistered 68-country survey of 71,922 respondents and found that in most countries, most p…

  • Human health as a motivator for climate change mitigation

    Open Access•Dorothee Amelung, Helen Fischer et al.•ARTICLE•Global Environmental Change•2019•Cited by: 4•References: 1

  • Acceptability of health-only versus climate-and-health framings in lifestyle-related climate-sensitive health counselling

    Open Access•Alina Herrmann, Nicola Krippl et al.•ARTICLE•The Lancet Planetary Health•2025•Cited by: 1•References: 5

    Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg

  • Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor

    Open Access•Dawn Liu Holford, Angelo Fasce et al.•ARTICLE•Science Communication•2023•Cited by: 1•References: 35

    Effective science communication is challenging when scientific messages are informed by a continually updating evidence base and must often compete against misinformation. We argue that we need a new program of science communication as collective intelligence—a collaborative approach, supported by technology. This would have four key advantages over the typical model where scientists communicate as individuals: scientific messages would be inform…

  • Explaining climate policies’ popularity—An empirical study in four European countries

    Open Access•Fabio Bothner, Florian Dorner et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2018•Cited by: 1•References: 10

  • Les dessous de l'amour romantique

    Helen Fischer•ARTICLE•Sciences Humaines•2006

  • Household preferences for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in four European high-income countries

    Open Access•Alina Herrmann, Helen Fischer et al.•ARTICLE•BMC Public Health•2017

    This is one of the first comprehensive mixed-methods approaches to investigate which mitigation measures households are most willing to implement in order to reach the 1,5° target set by the Paris Agreement, and whether health co-benefits can serve as a motivator for households to implement these measures. The comparison of the empirical data with current climate policies will provide knowledge for tailoring effective climate change mitigation an…

  • The 2018 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change

    Open Access•Nick Watts, Markus Amann et al.•ARTICLE•The Lancet•2018

  • Promoting health under the Paris Climate Agreement – results from a European mixed-methods study

    Open Access•Alina Herrmann, D Amelung et al.•ARTICLE•European Journal of Public Health•2018

  • How Well Do COP22 Attendees Understand Graphs on Climate Change Health Impacts from the Fifth IPCC Assessment Report

    Open Access•Helen Fischer, Stefanie Schütte et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of…•2018

    Graphs are prevalent in the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), often depicting key points and major results. However, the popularity of graphs in the IPCC reports contrasts with a neglect of empirical tests of their understandability. Here we put the understandability of three graphs taken from the Health chapter of the Fifth Assessment Report to an empirical test. We present a pilot study where we evaluate objective…

  • Explaining climate policies’ popularity—An empirical study in four European countries

    Open Access•Fabio Bothner, Florian Dorner et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2018•Cited by: 1•References: 10

  • It starts at home? Climate policies targeting household consumption and behavioral decisions are key to low-carbon futures

    Open Access•Ghislain Dubois, B K Sovacool et al.•ARTICLE•Energy Research & Social Science•2019•Cited by: 61•References: 16

    Through their consumption behavior, households are responsible for 72% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Thus, they are key actors in reaching the 1.5 °C goal under the Paris Agreement. However, the possible contribution and position of households in climate policies is neither well understood, nor do households receive sufficiently high priority in current climate policy strategies. This paper investigates how behavioral change can achieve a s…

  • Human health as a motivator for climate change mitigation

    Open Access•Dorothee Amelung, Helen Fischer et al.•ARTICLE•Global Environmental Change•2019•Cited by: 4•References: 1

  • When IPCC graphs can foster or bias understanding

    Open Access•Helen Fischer, Karlijn L Van Den Broek et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Research Letters•2020

    To develop effective climate change policy, decision-makers need to have the best possible understanding of the available climate science. The IPCC Assessment Reports therefore aim to lay the foundation for informed political decision-making by providing policy-relevant information. But how successful are IPCC reports at communicating key findings? Although IPCC reports display key information in graphs, the interpretation of such graphs has rece…

  • Importance of domain-specific metacognition for explaining beliefs about politicized science

    Open Access•Helen Fischer, Nadia Said•ARTICLE•Cognition•2021

  • Extrapolation accuracy underestimates rule learning

    Open Access•Nadia Said, Helen Fischer•ARTICLE•Acta Psychologica•2021

    Understanding the development of non-linear processes such as economic or population growth is an important prerequisite for informed decisions in those areas. In the function-learning paradigm, people's understanding of the function rule that underlies the to-be predicted process is typically measured by means of extrapolation accuracy. Here we argue, however, that even though accurate extrapolation necessitates rule-learning, the reverse does n…

  • Contested science

    Open Access•Nadia Said, Helen Fischer et al.•ARTICLE•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2022

    Societal polarization over contested science has increased in recent years. To explain this development, political, sociological, and psychological research has identified societal macro-phenomena as well as cognitive micro-level factors that explain how citizens reason about the science. Here we take a radically different perspective, and highlight the effects of metacognition: How citizens reason about their own reasoning. Leveraging methods fr…

  • Polarized climate change beliefs

    Helen Fischer, Markus Huff et al.•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•2022

    A substantial literature shows that public polarization over climate change in the U.S. is most pronounced among the science literate. A dominant explanation for this phenomenon is that science literacy amplifies motivated reasoning, the tendency to interpret evidence such that it confirms prior beliefs. The present study tests the biasing account of science literacy in a study among the U.S. population that investigated both interpretation of cl…

  • Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor

    Open Access•Dawn Liu Holford, Angelo Fasce et al.•ARTICLE•Science Communication•2023•Cited by: 1•References: 35

    Effective science communication is challenging when scientific messages are informed by a continually updating evidence base and must often compete against misinformation. We argue that we need a new program of science communication as collective intelligence—a collaborative approach, supported by technology. This would have four key advantages over the typical model where scientists communicate as individuals: scientific messages would be inform…

  • Making climate-sensitive health counselling acceptable for patients

    Open Access•Alina Herrmann, Claudia Quitmann et al.•ARTICLE•The Lancet Planetary Health•2025

  • Public Communication about Science in 68 Countries

    Open Access•Niels G Mede, Viktoria Cologna et al.•ARTICLE•Science Communication•2025•References: 11

    This 68-country survey ( n = 71,922) examines science information diets and communication behavior, identifies cross-country differences, and tests how such differences are associated with sociopolitical and economic conditions. We find that social media are the most used sources of science information in most countries, except those with democratic-corporatist media systems where news media tend to be used more widely. People in collectivist soc…

  • Acceptability of health-only versus climate-and-health framings in lifestyle-related climate-sensitive health counselling

    Open Access•Alina Herrmann, Nicola Krippl et al.•ARTICLE•The Lancet Planetary Health•2025•Cited by: 1•References: 5

    Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg

  • Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries

    Open Access•Viktoria Cologna, Niels G Mede et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2025•Cited by: 7•References: 76

    Science is crucial for evidence-based decision-making. Public trust in scientists can help decision makers act on the basis of the best available evidence, especially during crises. However, in recent years the epistemic authority of science has been challenged, causing concerns about low public trust in scientists. We interrogated these concerns with a preregistered 68-country survey of 71,922 respondents and found that in most countries, most p…

  • People’s Responses to Nuclear Weapons

    Open Access•Astrid Kause, Helen Fischer et al.•ARTICLE•Perspectives on Psychological…•2026

    Nuclear weapon threats are increasing and may be comparable to levels not seen since the worst periods of the Cold War. There could be value in psychologists documenting and explaining people’s responses to nuclear weapons. More than 3 decades have passed since the last major reviews of people’s responses to nuclear weapons. We thus aimed to understand how psychologists and researchers from related fields have empirically studied responses to nuc…

  • Zone‐flooding, public confusion, and signal detection theory

    Open Access•Helen Fischer, Vladimir Bojarskich et al.•ARTICLE•Political Psychology•2026•References: 41

    While historically, the aim of propaganda was to convince the public of a certain agenda, many political commentators contend that modern forms of disinformation come with a different goal in mind: To confuse, rather than convince. It is believed that to secure this goal, informational spaces are diluted, rather than dominated, a strategy termed “zone‐flooding.” The present research provides a unified psychological account of confusion that draws…

Climate change (10 works) · Climate Change Communication and Perception (10 works) · Political science (8 works) · Environmental Education and Sustainability (7 works) · Misinformation and Its Impacts (6 works) · Psychology (6 works) · Climate Change and Health Impacts (5 works) · Economics (5 works) · Medicine (5 works) · Computer Science (4 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae