Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Mark H Bernstein

Biographic Data

ID3866010
NAMEMark H Bernstein
GIVEN NAMESMark H
FAMILY NAMEBernstein
SIGNATUREBERNSTEIN M H
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS8
TOTAL CITATIONS3
AUTHOR COUNT8
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1992
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2019
H-INDEX1
  • Evaluating the Value of Animals and Humans

    Mark Bernstein, Mark H Bernstein•ARTICLE•Journal of Animal Ethics•2019

    Received opinion attributes greater value to the lives of humans than to the lives of (nonhuman) animals. Arguably, this conviction allows the continuation of the institutions of factory farming, hunting, and animal experimentation. After all, if we believe that the value of animal lives is at least equal to the value of human lives, we would presumably be quick to renounce and abolish these activities. My aim is to show that we have no good reas…

  • The Moral Equality of Humans and Animals

    Mark H Bernstein•BOOK•The Moral Equality of Humans and…•2016

  • The Moral Equality of Humans and Animals

    Open Access•Mark Bernstein, Mark H Bernstein•BOOK•Moral Equality of Humans and…•2015

    Received opinion has it that humans are morally superior to non-human animals; human interests matter more than the like interests of animals and the value of human lives is alleged to be greater than

  • A Response to MacClellan

    Mark Bernstein, Mark H Bernstein•ARTICLE•Journal of Animal Ethics•2013

    In "Size Matters" in this issue, Joel MacClellan argues for three claims: (1) according to utilitarianism, faced with a choice of eating large or small animals, we should eat the large; (2) utilitarianism may ground obligations to eat meat; and (3) we justifiably attract greater moral responsibility for the "direct" killing of our food animals than we do for "indirect" killing. MacClellan tends to underestimate the resources available even to hed…

  • Animals and the Moral Community

    Mark Bernstein, Mark H Bernstein•ARTICLE•Journal of Animal Ethics•2011

    Book Review| April 01 2011 Animals and the Moral Community: Mental Life, Moral Status, and Kinship Animals and the Moral Community: Mental Life, Moral Status, and Kinship. By Gary Steiner. (New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2008. 212 + xii pp. Hardback. $40.00. ISBN: 978-0-231-14234-2.). Mark H. Bernstein Mark H. Bernstein Purdue University Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Journal of Animal Ethics (2011) 1 (1): 96…

  • On Moral Considerability

    Ishtiyaque Haji, Mark Bernstein et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2001•Cited by: 3

  • On Moral Considerability

    Martino Traxler, Mark Bernstein et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2000

  • Fatalism

    Mark H Bernstein•BOOK•Fatalism•1992

  • On Moral Considerability

    Ishtiyaque Haji, Mark Bernstein et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2001•Cited by: 3

  • Fatalism

    Mark H Bernstein•BOOK•Fatalism•1992

  • On Moral Considerability

    Martino Traxler, Mark Bernstein et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2000

  • On Moral Considerability

    Ishtiyaque Haji, Mark Bernstein et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2001•Cited by: 3

  • Animals and the Moral Community

    Mark Bernstein, Mark H Bernstein•ARTICLE•Journal of Animal Ethics•2011

    Book Review| April 01 2011 Animals and the Moral Community: Mental Life, Moral Status, and Kinship Animals and the Moral Community: Mental Life, Moral Status, and Kinship. By Gary Steiner. (New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2008. 212 + xii pp. Hardback. $40.00. ISBN: 978-0-231-14234-2.). Mark H. Bernstein Mark H. Bernstein Purdue University Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Journal of Animal Ethics (2011) 1 (1): 96…

  • A Response to MacClellan

    Mark Bernstein, Mark H Bernstein•ARTICLE•Journal of Animal Ethics•2013

    In "Size Matters" in this issue, Joel MacClellan argues for three claims: (1) according to utilitarianism, faced with a choice of eating large or small animals, we should eat the large; (2) utilitarianism may ground obligations to eat meat; and (3) we justifiably attract greater moral responsibility for the "direct" killing of our food animals than we do for "indirect" killing. MacClellan tends to underestimate the resources available even to hed…

  • The Moral Equality of Humans and Animals

    Open Access•Mark Bernstein, Mark H Bernstein•BOOK•Moral Equality of Humans and…•2015

    Received opinion has it that humans are morally superior to non-human animals; human interests matter more than the like interests of animals and the value of human lives is alleged to be greater than

  • The Moral Equality of Humans and Animals

    Mark H Bernstein•BOOK•The Moral Equality of Humans and…•2016

  • Evaluating the Value of Animals and Humans

    Mark Bernstein, Mark H Bernstein•ARTICLE•Journal of Animal Ethics•2019

    Received opinion attributes greater value to the lives of humans than to the lives of (nonhuman) animals. Arguably, this conviction allows the continuation of the institutions of factory farming, hunting, and animal experimentation. After all, if we believe that the value of animal lives is at least equal to the value of human lives, we would presumably be quick to renounce and abolish these activities. My aim is to show that we have no good reas…

Philosophy (4 works) · Environmental ethics (3 works) · Epistemology (3 works) · Ethics in medical practice (3 works) · Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 works) · Animal welfare (2 works) · Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (2 works) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 works) · Ethics (2 works) · Moral philosophy (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae