Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cory Juhl

Biographic Data

ID3866101
NAMECory Juhl
GIVEN NAMESCory
FAMILY NAMEJuhl
SIGNATUREJUHL C
AFFILIATIONSThe University of Texas at Austin
ORCID0000-0001-6615-3518
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS8
TOTAL CITATIONS19
WORKS AS AUTHOR8
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1993
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2019
H-INDEX3
  • On the empirical inaccessibility of higher-level modality and its significance for cosmological fine-tuning

    Open Access•Cory Juhl, Brian Knab et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2019•References: 8

  • Pure and Impure Stipulata

    Open Access•Cory Juhl•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2009•References: 1

  • Analyticity

    Cory Juhl•BOOK•Analyticity•2009

  • Transcendental Deductions and Universal Architectures for Inductive Inferences

    Kevin T Kelly, Cory Juhl et al.•ARTICLE•ProtoSociology•1998

  • Learning Theory and the Philosophy of Science

    Open Access•Kevin T Kelly, Oliver Schulte et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1997•Cited by: 8•References: 19

    This paper places formal learning theory in a broader philosophical context and provides a glimpse of what the philosophy of induction looks like from a learning-theoretic point of view. Formal learning theory is compared with other standard approaches to the philosophy of induction. Thereafter, we present some results and examples indicating its unique character and philosophical interest, with special attention to its unified perspective on ind…

  • Objectively reliable subjective probabilities

    Open Access•Cory F Juhl, Cory Juhl•ARTICLE•Synthese•1996•Cited by: 4•References: 3

  • The Speed-Optimality of Reichenbach's Straight Rule of Induction

    Cory F Juhl, Cory Juhl•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1994•Cited by: 3

    In his Theory of Probability, Hans Reichenbach made a bold and original attempt to ‘vindicate’ induction. He proposed a rule, the ‘straight rule’ of induction, which would guarantee inductive success if any rule of induction would. A central problem facing his attempt to vindicate the straight rule is that too many other rules are just as good as the straight rule if our only constraint on what counts as ‘success’ for an inductive rule is that it…

  • Bayesianism and Reliable Scientific Inquiry

    Open Access•Cory Juhl•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1993•Cited by: 4•References: 6

    The inductive reliability of Bayesian methods is explored. The first result presented shows that for any solvable inductive problem of a general type, there exists a subjective prior which yields a Bayesian inductive method that solves the problem, although not all subjective priors give rise to a successful inductive method for the problem. The second result shows that the same does not hold for computationally bounded agents, so that Bayesianis…

  • Learning Theory and the Philosophy of Science

    Open Access•Kevin T Kelly, Oliver Schulte et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1997•Cited by: 8•References: 19

    This paper places formal learning theory in a broader philosophical context and provides a glimpse of what the philosophy of induction looks like from a learning-theoretic point of view. Formal learning theory is compared with other standard approaches to the philosophy of induction. Thereafter, we present some results and examples indicating its unique character and philosophical interest, with special attention to its unified perspective on ind…

  • Objectively reliable subjective probabilities

    Open Access•Cory F Juhl, Cory Juhl•ARTICLE•Synthese•1996•Cited by: 4•References: 3

  • Bayesianism and Reliable Scientific Inquiry

    Open Access•Cory Juhl•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1993•Cited by: 4•References: 6

    The inductive reliability of Bayesian methods is explored. The first result presented shows that for any solvable inductive problem of a general type, there exists a subjective prior which yields a Bayesian inductive method that solves the problem, although not all subjective priors give rise to a successful inductive method for the problem. The second result shows that the same does not hold for computationally bounded agents, so that Bayesianis…

  • The Speed-Optimality of Reichenbach's Straight Rule of Induction

    Cory F Juhl, Cory Juhl•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1994•Cited by: 3

    In his Theory of Probability, Hans Reichenbach made a bold and original attempt to ‘vindicate’ induction. He proposed a rule, the ‘straight rule’ of induction, which would guarantee inductive success if any rule of induction would. A central problem facing his attempt to vindicate the straight rule is that too many other rules are just as good as the straight rule if our only constraint on what counts as ‘success’ for an inductive rule is that it…

  • Bayesianism and Reliable Scientific Inquiry

    Open Access•Cory Juhl•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1993•Cited by: 4•References: 6

    The inductive reliability of Bayesian methods is explored. The first result presented shows that for any solvable inductive problem of a general type, there exists a subjective prior which yields a Bayesian inductive method that solves the problem, although not all subjective priors give rise to a successful inductive method for the problem. The second result shows that the same does not hold for computationally bounded agents, so that Bayesianis…

  • The Speed-Optimality of Reichenbach's Straight Rule of Induction

    Cory F Juhl, Cory Juhl•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1994•Cited by: 3

    In his Theory of Probability, Hans Reichenbach made a bold and original attempt to ‘vindicate’ induction. He proposed a rule, the ‘straight rule’ of induction, which would guarantee inductive success if any rule of induction would. A central problem facing his attempt to vindicate the straight rule is that too many other rules are just as good as the straight rule if our only constraint on what counts as ‘success’ for an inductive rule is that it…

  • Objectively reliable subjective probabilities

    Open Access•Cory F Juhl, Cory Juhl•ARTICLE•Synthese•1996•Cited by: 4•References: 3

  • Learning Theory and the Philosophy of Science

    Open Access•Kevin T Kelly, Oliver Schulte et al.•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1997•Cited by: 8•References: 19

    This paper places formal learning theory in a broader philosophical context and provides a glimpse of what the philosophy of induction looks like from a learning-theoretic point of view. Formal learning theory is compared with other standard approaches to the philosophy of induction. Thereafter, we present some results and examples indicating its unique character and philosophical interest, with special attention to its unified perspective on ind…

  • Transcendental Deductions and Universal Architectures for Inductive Inferences

    Kevin T Kelly, Cory Juhl et al.•ARTICLE•ProtoSociology•1998

  • Pure and Impure Stipulata

    Open Access•Cory Juhl•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2009•References: 1

  • Analyticity

    Cory Juhl•BOOK•Analyticity•2009

  • On the empirical inaccessibility of higher-level modality and its significance for cosmological fine-tuning

    Open Access•Cory Juhl, Brian Knab et al.•ARTICLE•Synthese•2019•References: 8

Computer Science (6 works) · Epistemology (6 works) · Mathematics (5 works) · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (4 works) · Metaphysics (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Philosophy and History of Science (4 works) · Artificial Intelligence (3 works) · Artificial Intelligence (3 works) · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae