Mark C Fox
Biographic Data
| ID | 3885261 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Mark C Fox |
| GIVEN NAMES | Mark C |
| FAMILY NAME | Fox |
| SIGNATURE | FOX M C |
| AFFILIATIONS | Florida State University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 17 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 2 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2011 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2011 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Thinking aloud is not a form of introspection but a qualitatively different methodology
Schooler's (2011) commentary of our meta-analysis (Fox, Ericsson, & Best, 2011), although thoughtful and generally complimentary, misclassifies the think-aloud method as a form of introspection. Although he praised the scientific rigor of the think-aloud method, Schooler criticized its limitations as a mode of capturing the full range of conscious phenomena, especially nonverbal aspects of consciousness. He noted that reactive effects (changes in…
Do procedures for verbal reporting of thinking have to be reactive? A meta-analysis and recommendations for best reporting methods
Since its establishment, psychology has struggled to find valid methods for studying thoughts and subjective experiences. Thirty years ago, Ericsson and Simon (1980) proposed that participants can give concurrent verbal expression to their thoughts (think aloud) while completing tasks without changing objectively measurable performance (accuracy). In contrast, directed requests for concurrent verbal reports, such as explanations or directions to …
Do procedures for verbal reporting of thinking have to be reactive? A meta-analysis and recommendations for best reporting methods
Since its establishment, psychology has struggled to find valid methods for studying thoughts and subjective experiences. Thirty years ago, Ericsson and Simon (1980) proposed that participants can give concurrent verbal expression to their thoughts (think aloud) while completing tasks without changing objectively measurable performance (accuracy). In contrast, directed requests for concurrent verbal reports, such as explanations or directions to …
Thinking aloud is not a form of introspection but a qualitatively different methodology
Schooler's (2011) commentary of our meta-analysis (Fox, Ericsson, & Best, 2011), although thoughtful and generally complimentary, misclassifies the think-aloud method as a form of introspection. Although he praised the scientific rigor of the think-aloud method, Schooler criticized its limitations as a mode of capturing the full range of conscious phenomena, especially nonverbal aspects of consciousness. He noted that reactive effects (changes in…
Do procedures for verbal reporting of thinking have to be reactive? A meta-analysis and recommendations for best reporting methods
Since its establishment, psychology has struggled to find valid methods for studying thoughts and subjective experiences. Thirty years ago, Ericsson and Simon (1980) proposed that participants can give concurrent verbal expression to their thoughts (think aloud) while completing tasks without changing objectively measurable performance (accuracy). In contrast, directed requests for concurrent verbal reports, such as explanations or directions to …
Artificial Intelligence (2 works) · Artificial Intelligence (2 works) · Cognitive psychology (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Human–computer interaction (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Task (project management) (2 works) · Think aloud protocol (2 works) · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (1 work) · Cognitive science (1 work)