Marco Hausmann
Biographic Data
| ID | 3892040 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Marco Hausmann |
| GIVEN NAMES | Marco |
| FAMILY NAME | Hausmann |
| SIGNATURE | HAUSMANN M |
| AFFILIATIONS | Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-6722-6245 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 5 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 1 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2018 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Anderskönnen trotz Determinismus
Können wir frei sein, wenn es Wahrheiten über die Zukunft gibt, wenn es einen allwissenden Gott gibt oder wenn die Naturgesetze deterministisch sind? Marco Hausmann geht diesen Fragen nach, indem er eines der einflussreichsten Argumente aus der gegenwärtigen Debatte ausführlich analysiert: das Konsequenzargument. Das Konsequenzargument versucht, auf diese Fragen eine klare Antwort zu geben: Wenn es Wahrheiten über die Zukunft gibt, wenn es einen …
Brief Remarks on Sterba's Moral Argument from Evil
We pose two challenges to Sterba's position. First, we show that Sterba fails to consider alternative historical positions such as Leibniz's (who argues that God knows that the actual world is the best of all possible worlds) or Kant's (who suggests that God does not necessarily know what free agents would choose or would have chosen, had God not intervened), both of which bear direct relevance to some major aspects of Sterba's argument. Second, …
Free Will: Historical and Analytic Perspectives
The Uniqueness of Necessary Truth and the Status of S4 and S5
The aim of this paper is to relate the debate about the status of S4 and S5 as modal logics for metaphysical modality to the debate about the identity of propositions. The necessary truth of the characteristic axioms of S4 and S5 (when interpreted in terms of metaphysical modality) is derived from a view about the identity of propositions, the view that necessarily equivalent propositions are identical
Free Will: Historical and Analytic Perspectives
The consequence argument ungrounded
No prominent works on this page.
The consequence argument ungrounded
Free Will: Historical and Analytic Perspectives
The Uniqueness of Necessary Truth and the Status of S4 and S5
The aim of this paper is to relate the debate about the status of S4 and S5 as modal logics for metaphysical modality to the debate about the identity of propositions. The necessary truth of the characteristic axioms of S4 and S5 (when interpreted in terms of metaphysical modality) is derived from a view about the identity of propositions, the view that necessarily equivalent propositions are identical
Free Will: Historical and Analytic Perspectives
Brief Remarks on Sterba's Moral Argument from Evil
We pose two challenges to Sterba's position. First, we show that Sterba fails to consider alternative historical positions such as Leibniz's (who argues that God knows that the actual world is the best of all possible worlds) or Kant's (who suggests that God does not necessarily know what free agents would choose or would have chosen, had God not intervened), both of which bear direct relevance to some major aspects of Sterba's argument. Second, …
Anderskönnen trotz Determinismus
Können wir frei sein, wenn es Wahrheiten über die Zukunft gibt, wenn es einen allwissenden Gott gibt oder wenn die Naturgesetze deterministisch sind? Marco Hausmann geht diesen Fragen nach, indem er eines der einflussreichsten Argumente aus der gegenwärtigen Debatte ausführlich analysiert: das Konsequenzargument. Das Konsequenzargument versucht, auf diese Fragen eine klare Antwort zu geben: Wenn es Wahrheiten über die Zukunft gibt, wenn es einen …
Epistemology (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Free Will and Agency (2 works) · Metaphysics (2 works) · Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Aesthetics (1 works) · Allwissenheit (1 works) · Anthropology (1 works)