Zuo-Jun Wang

Biographic Data

ID389266
NAMEZuo-Jun Wang
GIVEN NAMESZuo-Jun
FAMILY NAMEWang
SIGNATUREWANG Z
AFFILIATIONSAnhui Normal University
ORCID0000-0003-4360-1423
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS9
TOTAL CITATIONS0
AUTHOR COUNT9
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2010
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX0

  • Social Class and Children’s Third-party Intervention Tendency and Forms

    Open AccessYa-Meng Wang, Shu ZHAO et al.ARTICLEPersonality and Social Psychology…2025

    This study investigated how social class is related to children’s third-party intervention (TPI) tendency and forms (compensation vs. punishment). Children from different social class backgrounds watched short animated films depicting two cartoon characters making fair or unfair decisions in resource distribution scenarios. The results revealed that, compared to children from higher social classes, children from lower social classes were more lik…

  • “Renqing” or equity? The influence of favor acceptance on inequity aversion

    Zuo-Jun Wang, Zuo‐Jun Wang et al.ARTICLEActa Psychologica Sinica2025

    摘要: 互惠与公平是人际互动的基本准则。以往研究往往分别考察互惠与公平原则对人际行为的影响, 却鲜有研究考察当两者相悖时人们如何取舍。本研究5项实验分别通过故事情境法和实验室实验法操纵受人恩惠的条件, 并考察其对个体不公平规避行为的影响及潜在心理机制。结果表明, 受人恩惠, 无论是大恩惠还是“小恩小惠”, 均显著降低了个体的不公平规避行为。研究结果还揭示了不同大小恩惠条件下中介机制的不对称性:在大恩惠条件下, 亏欠情绪中介了受人恩惠对不公平规避行为的影响, 而在“小恩小惠”条件下, 感激情绪起到了中介作用。研究结果不仅为理解公平行为的复杂心理过程提供了新的解释视角, 同时也为企业和政府部门制定相关政策, 有效规避由恩惠而引发的违反公平的现象提供实践依据

  • Chinese Adolescents' Belief in a Just World: Social Class and Age Disparities

    Open AccessSa-Sa Lyu, Ya-Meng Wang et al.ARTICLEYouth & Society2025References: 28

    This cross-sectional study examined how Chinese adolescents' belief in a just world (BJW) varied across social class and age. A sample of 2,748 adolescents aged 10 to 18 years (47.2% female; 99.1% Han ethnicity) from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds in China completed the Belief in a Just World Scale and the Socioeconomic Status Survey. Adolescents from higher social-class backgrounds were found to have higher general and personal BJW compared t…

  • Social class, schadenfreude, and children’s prosocial behavior in moral contexts

    Zuo-Jun Wang, Zuo‐Jun Wang et al.ARTICLEEmotion2024

    Previous research has shown mixed results regarding the relationship between social class and children's prosocial behavior. The current study aims to further our understanding of these findings by exploring the relationship between social class and children's prosocial behavior in a moral context. Study 1 ( N = 833) found that when a target child pursued a morally negative goal and subsequently experienced misfortune, children from higher social…

  • Social Class and Children’s Prosociality: A Study in the Context of China’s Dual Urban–Rural Structure

    Open AccessYi Kuang, Fei Wang et al.ARTICLESocial Psychological and…2021

    China’s dual urban–rural structure has resulted in rural residents with a lower social rank vis-à-vis urban residents. This research examined prosociality between lower class individuals (rural children) and higher class individuals (urban children), operationalized using the dictator game, which focuses on sharing resources with others. Two studies consistently showed that both rural and urban children were more likely to share more resources wi…

  • Tests of the Integrative Model and Priority Heuristic Model from the Point of View of Choice Process: Evidence from an Eye-tracking Study

    Zuo-Jun Wang, Zuo‐Jun Wang et al.ARTICLEActa Psychologica Sinica2013

    摘要: 基于信息加工过程视角, 本研究采用眼动技术检验风险决策整合模型和占优启发式模型。结果表明, 自主决策任务条件下决策过程反应时及信息搜索模式均不同于期望价值(EV)迫选任务条件下的决策过程反应时及信息搜索模式; 自主决策任务条件下决策过程反应时并未随着选项间整体值(CPT值)差值的变大而变快, 且基于特征(attribute-based)的信息搜索多于基于选项(option-based)的信息搜索, 不符合整合模型预期。此外, 决策者亦未按照占优启发式模型所假定的决策步骤进行决策。基于信息加工过程的检验结果既不利于以累积预期理论为代表的整合模型, 亦不利于占优启发式模型。文章建议从决策过程视角检验已有决策模型及建立新的启发式决策过程模型(process model)

  • Emotional response in a disjunction condition

    Open AccessZuo-Jun Wang, Zuo‐Jun Wang et al.ARTICLEJournal of Economic Psychology2012References: 21

  • Disadvantage and prosocial behavior: The effects of the Wenchuan earthquake

    Open AccessLi-Lin Rao, Ru Han et al.ARTICLEEvolution and Human Behavior2011

  • Integrative Model or the Priority Heuristic? A Test from the Point of View of the Equate-to-Differentiate Model: Integrative Model or the Priority Heuristic? A Test from the Point of View of the Equat…

    Zuo-Jun Wang, Zuo‐Jun Wang et al.ARTICLEActa Psychologica Sinica2010

    摘要: 实验从齐当别模型的视角, 通过对决策过程反应时的考察分别对以累积预期理论(cumulative prospect theory)为代表的整合模型和启发式模型家族的重要成员—— 占优启发式模型(priority heuristic)——进行检验。结果表明, 决策过程反应时并未随着占优启发式模型所假定的决策步骤的增加而变慢; 也未随着选项之间整体值差值的变大而变快; 模糊决策过程的反应时反而快于风险决策过程的反应时。无论是以累积预期理论为代表的整合模型还是占优启发式模型均不能满意地描述和解释人们的实际决策过程, 而齐当别模型则能解释大部分实验结果。文章建议多角度、多指标探讨人们的决策过程, 检验、修改、完善, 以及建立新的启发式模型或决策过程模型(process model), 以增进对人们如何进行风险决策的理解