Lukas H Meyer
Biographic Data
| ID | 3909049 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Lukas H Meyer |
| GIVEN NAMES | Lukas H |
| FAMILY NAME | Meyer |
| SIGNATURE | MEYER L H |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Graz |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 21 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 71 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 16 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 5 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2000 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| H-INDEX | 4 |
Basic Needs and Sufficiency
This chapter addresses a theory of intergenerational justice that is referred to as needs-based sufficientarianism. According to needs-based sufficientarianism, the present generation ought to enable future generations to meet their basic needs—for example, their needs for drinkable water, food, and healthcare. The authors’ aim is to explain and defend this theory in a programmatic way. First, they introduce what they regard as the most plausible…
Rectifying Historical Injustice
Superseding historical injustice? New critical assessments
This article proposes that debates over historical injustice and Jeremy Waldron’s supersession thesis are helpfully framed by distinguishing between (a) the abstract supersession thesis proper, (b) the temporal orientation of justice, (c) various conceptions of supersession, and (d) arguments against using supersession discourse. This introduction and contributors to this volume advance the debate by discussing Waldron’s later, less examined writ…
Climate Justice and Historical Emissions
Enough for the Future
This chapter discusses intergenerational justice by distinguishing between sufficientarian and egalitarian conceptions of justice. A strictly egalitarian position by which understands a position that holds equality to be of intrinsic value is open to the so-called levelling- down-objection. As explained, the position of weak sufficientarianism can be understood as a qualified priority view. The position of strong sufficientarianism, however, can …
Intergenerational Justice
Philosophy of Justice
Democracy, Equality, and Justice
1. Introduction: Democracy, Equality, and Justice Matt Matravers and Lukas H. Meyer Justice and Democracy 2. Representing Future Generations: Political Presentism and Democratic Trusteeship Dennis F. Thompson 3. Justice, Legitimacy, and Constitutional Rights Wilfried Hinsch Justice and Quality 4. Why Equality? On Justifying Liberal Egalitarianism Paul Kelly 5. Luck, Equality and Responsibility Keith Dowding 6. Coercive Redistribution and Public A…
How legitimate expectations matter in climate justice
Expectations play an important role in how people plan their lives and pursue their projects. People living in highly industrialized countries share a way of life that comes with high levels of emissions. Their expectations to be able to continue their projects imply their holding expectations to similarly high future levels of personal emissions. We argue that the frustration or undermining of these expectations would cause them significant harm…
Individual Expectations and Climate Justice
Many people living in highly industrialised countries and elsewhere emit greenhouse gases at a certain high level as a by-product of their activities, and they expect to be able to continue to emit at that level. This level is far above the just per capita level. We investigate whether that expectation is legitimate and permissible. We argue that the expectation is epistemically legitimate. Given certain assumptions, we can also think of it as po…
Climate justice and historical emissions
Climate change can be interpreted as a unique case of historical injustice involving issues of both intergenerational and global justice. We split the issue into two separate questions. First, how should emission rights be distributed? Second, who should come up for the costs of coping with climate change? We regard the first question as being an issue of pure distributive justice and argue on prioritarian grounds that the developing world should…
Intergenerational justice
Is it fair to leave the next generation a public debt? Is it defensible to impose legal rules on them through constitutional constraints? From combating climate change to ensuring proper funding for future pensions, concerns about ethics between generations are everywhere. Sixteen philosophers present new explorations of intergenerational justice. - ;Is it fair to leave the next generation a public debt? Is it defensible to impose legal rules on …
Enough for the Future
Reflecting the normative significance of specific features of intergenerational relations this chapter investigates the justice claims of future people vis-à-vis currently living people. It discusses sufficientarian and egalitarian conceptions of justice, and argues that a sufficientarian approach is appropriate in the intergenerational context. This conclusion is based, first, on the argument that by relying on a threshold conception of harm we …
Legitimacy, Justice and Public International Law
Do states or individuals stand under duties of international justice to people who live elsewhere and to other states? How are we to assess the legitimacy of international institutions such as the International Monetary Fund and the United Nations Security Council? Should we support reforms of international institutions and how should we go about assessing alternative proposals of such reforms? The book brings together leading scholars of public …
Reparations and Symbolic Restitution
Distributive Justice and Climate Change. The Allocation of Emission Rights
The emission of greenhouse gases causes climate change. Therefore, many support a global cap on emissions. How then should the emissions allowed under this cap be distributed? We first show that above average past emissions cannot be used to justify a right to above average current emissions. We then sketch three basic principles of distributive justice (egalitarianism, prioritarianism, and sufficientarianism) and argue, first, that prioritarian …
Rights, Culture and the Law
This book brings together a collection of original papers on some of the main tenets of Joseph Raz's legal and political philosophy: legal positivism and the nature of law, practical reason, authority, the value of equality, incommensurability, harm, group rights, and multiculturalism. It raises questions concerning Raz's notion of group rights and its application to claims of cultural and political autonomy, and examines his theory of multicultu…
Rights, culture, and the law
This volume brings together a collection of original papers on some of the main tenets of Joseph Raz's legal and political philosophy: legal positivism and the nature of law, practical reason, authority, group rights and multiculturalism.
Past and Future
Liberal cosmopolitans often take the view that currently living people, wherever they may live, and future people, whenever their lives take place, have, qua human beings, the same moral status. Cosmopolitans are inclined to deny the relevance of the special features of our relations to future people. Liberal cosmopolitans also commonly take the view that currently living people cannot be said to have claims to compensation because their predeces…
Obligations persistantes et réparation symbolique
H. Meyer Lukas, Gosseries Axel. Obligations persistantes et réparation symbolique. In: Revue Philosophique de Louvain. Quatrième série, tome 101, n°1, 2003. pp. 105-122
Liberal Cosmopolitanism and Moral Motivation
How legitimate expectations matter in climate justice
Expectations play an important role in how people plan their lives and pursue their projects. People living in highly industrialized countries share a way of life that comes with high levels of emissions. Their expectations to be able to continue their projects imply their holding expectations to similarly high future levels of personal emissions. We argue that the frustration or undermining of these expectations would cause them significant harm…
Climate justice and historical emissions
Climate change can be interpreted as a unique case of historical injustice involving issues of both intergenerational and global justice. We split the issue into two separate questions. First, how should emission rights be distributed? Second, who should come up for the costs of coping with climate change? We regard the first question as being an issue of pure distributive justice and argue on prioritarian grounds that the developing world should…
Liberal Cosmopolitanism and Moral Motivation
Distributive Justice and Climate Change. The Allocation of Emission Rights
The emission of greenhouse gases causes climate change. Therefore, many support a global cap on emissions. How then should the emissions allowed under this cap be distributed? We first show that above average past emissions cannot be used to justify a right to above average current emissions. We then sketch three basic principles of distributive justice (egalitarianism, prioritarianism, and sufficientarianism) and argue, first, that prioritarian …
Superseding historical injustice? New critical assessments
This article proposes that debates over historical injustice and Jeremy Waldron’s supersession thesis are helpfully framed by distinguishing between (a) the abstract supersession thesis proper, (b) the temporal orientation of justice, (c) various conceptions of supersession, and (d) arguments against using supersession discourse. This introduction and contributors to this volume advance the debate by discussing Waldron’s later, less examined writ…
Liberal Cosmopolitanism and Moral Motivation
Rights, Culture and the Law
This book brings together a collection of original papers on some of the main tenets of Joseph Raz's legal and political philosophy: legal positivism and the nature of law, practical reason, authority, the value of equality, incommensurability, harm, group rights, and multiculturalism. It raises questions concerning Raz's notion of group rights and its application to claims of cultural and political autonomy, and examines his theory of multicultu…
Rights, culture, and the law
This volume brings together a collection of original papers on some of the main tenets of Joseph Raz's legal and political philosophy: legal positivism and the nature of law, practical reason, authority, group rights and multiculturalism.
Past and Future
Liberal cosmopolitans often take the view that currently living people, wherever they may live, and future people, whenever their lives take place, have, qua human beings, the same moral status. Cosmopolitans are inclined to deny the relevance of the special features of our relations to future people. Liberal cosmopolitans also commonly take the view that currently living people cannot be said to have claims to compensation because their predeces…
Obligations persistantes et réparation symbolique
H. Meyer Lukas, Gosseries Axel. Obligations persistantes et réparation symbolique. In: Revue Philosophique de Louvain. Quatrième série, tome 101, n°1, 2003. pp. 105-122
Reparations and Symbolic Restitution
Distributive Justice and Climate Change. The Allocation of Emission Rights
The emission of greenhouse gases causes climate change. Therefore, many support a global cap on emissions. How then should the emissions allowed under this cap be distributed? We first show that above average past emissions cannot be used to justify a right to above average current emissions. We then sketch three basic principles of distributive justice (egalitarianism, prioritarianism, and sufficientarianism) and argue, first, that prioritarian …
Intergenerational justice
Is it fair to leave the next generation a public debt? Is it defensible to impose legal rules on them through constitutional constraints? From combating climate change to ensuring proper funding for future pensions, concerns about ethics between generations are everywhere. Sixteen philosophers present new explorations of intergenerational justice. - ;Is it fair to leave the next generation a public debt? Is it defensible to impose legal rules on …
Enough for the Future
Reflecting the normative significance of specific features of intergenerational relations this chapter investigates the justice claims of future people vis-à-vis currently living people. It discusses sufficientarian and egalitarian conceptions of justice, and argues that a sufficientarian approach is appropriate in the intergenerational context. This conclusion is based, first, on the argument that by relying on a threshold conception of harm we …
Legitimacy, Justice and Public International Law
Do states or individuals stand under duties of international justice to people who live elsewhere and to other states? How are we to assess the legitimacy of international institutions such as the International Monetary Fund and the United Nations Security Council? Should we support reforms of international institutions and how should we go about assessing alternative proposals of such reforms? The book brings together leading scholars of public …
Climate justice and historical emissions
Climate change can be interpreted as a unique case of historical injustice involving issues of both intergenerational and global justice. We split the issue into two separate questions. First, how should emission rights be distributed? Second, who should come up for the costs of coping with climate change? We regard the first question as being an issue of pure distributive justice and argue on prioritarian grounds that the developing world should…
Individual Expectations and Climate Justice
Many people living in highly industrialised countries and elsewhere emit greenhouse gases at a certain high level as a by-product of their activities, and they expect to be able to continue to emit at that level. This level is far above the just per capita level. We investigate whether that expectation is legitimate and permissible. We argue that the expectation is epistemically legitimate. Given certain assumptions, we can also think of it as po…
How legitimate expectations matter in climate justice
Expectations play an important role in how people plan their lives and pursue their projects. People living in highly industrialized countries share a way of life that comes with high levels of emissions. Their expectations to be able to continue their projects imply their holding expectations to similarly high future levels of personal emissions. We argue that the frustration or undermining of these expectations would cause them significant harm…
Democracy, Equality, and Justice
1. Introduction: Democracy, Equality, and Justice Matt Matravers and Lukas H. Meyer Justice and Democracy 2. Representing Future Generations: Political Presentism and Democratic Trusteeship Dennis F. Thompson 3. Justice, Legitimacy, and Constitutional Rights Wilfried Hinsch Justice and Quality 4. Why Equality? On Justifying Liberal Egalitarianism Paul Kelly 5. Luck, Equality and Responsibility Keith Dowding 6. Coercive Redistribution and Public A…
Philosophy of Justice
Climate Justice and Historical Emissions
Enough for the Future
This chapter discusses intergenerational justice by distinguishing between sufficientarian and egalitarian conceptions of justice. A strictly egalitarian position by which understands a position that holds equality to be of intrinsic value is open to the so-called levelling- down-objection. As explained, the position of weak sufficientarianism can be understood as a qualified priority view. The position of strong sufficientarianism, however, can …
Intergenerational Justice
Basic Needs and Sufficiency
This chapter addresses a theory of intergenerational justice that is referred to as needs-based sufficientarianism. According to needs-based sufficientarianism, the present generation ought to enable future generations to meet their basic needs—for example, their needs for drinkable water, food, and healthcare. The authors’ aim is to explain and defend this theory in a programmatic way. First, they introduce what they regard as the most plausible…
Rectifying Historical Injustice
Superseding historical injustice? New critical assessments
This article proposes that debates over historical injustice and Jeremy Waldron’s supersession thesis are helpfully framed by distinguishing between (a) the abstract supersession thesis proper, (b) the temporal orientation of justice, (c) various conceptions of supersession, and (d) arguments against using supersession discourse. This introduction and contributors to this volume advance the debate by discussing Waldron’s later, less examined writ…
Political science (18 works) · Law (17 works) · Sociology (17 works) · Economic Justice (14 works) · Climate Change and Geoengineering (10 works) · Law and economics (10 works) · Political Philosophy and Ethics (10 works) · Politics (9 works) · Economics (8 works) · Philosophy (7 works)