Ramzi Mabsout
Biographic Data
| ID | 390992 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Ramzi Mabsout |
| GIVEN NAMES | Ramzi |
| FAMILY NAME | Mabsout |
| SIGNATURE | MABSOUT R |
| AFFILIATIONS | American University of Beirut |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 8 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 44 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 8 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2009 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
John Stuart Mill, soft paternalist
Response to Polzin, Rauschmayer, Lilley, and Whitehead (2015) What could ‘mindful capabilities’ be? A comment on Mabsout's ‘mindful capability’
Reconciling economics with naturalist ethical theory
The exclusive use of evolutionary explanations and game theory to justify moral claims has led economists to an impasse. Our discussion of this problem is focused on arguments made by Kenneth Binmore and Herbert Gintis, two vocal and notable economists behind these efforts. We begin by pointing out the false dilemma they present between ethical theories involving dubious non-naturalist metaphysics and their versions of naturalized game-theoretic …
Mindful capability
The Society of Equals
Bringing Ethics Back to Welfare Economics
Economists do not agree on the nature of welfare economics: is it normative or positive analysis? To overcome this disagreement and bridge the gap between the two views, the argument developed here takes two steps. The first identifies the metaethical positions of those for and those against the moral normativity of welfare economics. Metaethical positions differ on the ontology and ultimate legitimacy of morality. What appears in ethical terms a…
Capability and Health Functioning in Ethiopian Households
Disentangling Bargaining Power from Individual and Household Level to Institutions
Disentangling Bargaining Power from Individual and Household Level to Institutions
Capability and Health Functioning in Ethiopian Households
Bringing Ethics Back to Welfare Economics
Economists do not agree on the nature of welfare economics: is it normative or positive analysis? To overcome this disagreement and bridge the gap between the two views, the argument developed here takes two steps. The first identifies the metaethical positions of those for and those against the moral normativity of welfare economics. Metaethical positions differ on the ontology and ultimate legitimacy of morality. What appears in ethical terms a…
Mindful capability
The Society of Equals
Response to Polzin, Rauschmayer, Lilley, and Whitehead (2015) What could ‘mindful capabilities’ be? A comment on Mabsout's ‘mindful capability’
Reconciling economics with naturalist ethical theory
The exclusive use of evolutionary explanations and game theory to justify moral claims has led economists to an impasse. Our discussion of this problem is focused on arguments made by Kenneth Binmore and Herbert Gintis, two vocal and notable economists behind these efforts. We begin by pointing out the false dilemma they present between ethical theories involving dubious non-naturalist metaphysics and their versions of naturalized game-theoretic …
John Stuart Mill, soft paternalist
Economics (7 works) · Sociology (6 works) · Political science (5 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Bargaining power (2 works) · Business (2 works) · Capability approach (2 works) · Economic growth (2 works) · Economic Theory and Institutions (2 works) · Engineering (2 works)