Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Mario Borillo

Biographic Data

ID3920327
NAMEMario Borillo
GIVEN NAMESMario
FAMILY NAMEBorillo
SIGNATUREBORILLO M
AFFILIATIONSCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et Technique (CNRST)
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS8
TOTAL CITATIONS9
WORKS AS AUTHOR8
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1971
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX1
  • Pesquisa qualitativa no contexto da formação ao cuidado em saúde

    Open Access•Ellen Synthia Fernandes De Oliveira, Miriam Bras et al.•ARTICLE•Ciência & Saúde Coletiva•2024

  • A temporal reasoning cognitive approach

    Open Access•Andrée Borillo, Mario Borillo et al.•ARTICLE•Semiotica•1989

  • Cogniticiens, encore un effort

    Mario Borillo•ARTICLE•Hermès•1988

  • Descriptive Statements, Covering Laws, and Theories in Archaeology [and Comments and Reply]

    D Read, Dwight W Read et al.•ARTICLE•Current Anthropology•1978•Cited by: 7

    The paradigm for explanation in archaeology presented by the "new archaeologists" is reviewed and shown to need further elaboration. It is argued that that presentation has overemphasized the form of explanatory arguments and insufficiently considered their content. Not all explanatory arguments provide intuitively satisfactory explanations of particular observations. Instead, intuitively satisfactory explanations require general theories which s…

  • A Few Remarks on Whallon's 'A New Approach to Pottery Typology

    Open Access•Mario Borillo•ARTICLE•American Antiquity•1974•Cited by: 1

    Some implicit assumptions in Whallon's mathematically rigorous method for reproducing Ritchie's traditional Owasco pottery typology are pointed out, and some of the 'validity limits' of his conclusions are discussed

  • Construction of a Deductive Model by Simulation of a Traditional Archaeological Study

    Open Access•Mario Borillo•ARTICLE•American Antiquity•1974•References: 3

    This article is based on 2 observations. First, I note the quality of certain traditional archaeological studies, focusing on evaluation of results obtained and of information used. Second, I observe the incoherence of many of the constructions of 'analytical' archaeologists, who sometimes naively imagine that it is possible to substitute sophisticated algorithms for analysis of the logic and archaeological meaning of problems in prehistory.The g…

  • Reply to the ‘comments on computers in archaeology’

    Mario Borillo•ARTICLE•Norwegian Archaeological Review•1971•References: 3

  • Formal procedures and the use of computers in archaeology

    Mario Borillo•ARTICLE•Norwegian Archaeological Review•1971•Cited by: 1

    It is well known that the introduction of rigorous semiological and mathematical methods is the necessary condition of the coherent application of computers to archaeology. The aim of this article is simply to emphasize two less obvious aspects of present research trends: (1) The different phases of archaeological work, at which the new methods are introduced, are interdependent. The solution adopted at each level — information retrieval, descrip…

  • Descriptive Statements, Covering Laws, and Theories in Archaeology [and Comments and Reply]

    D Read, Dwight W Read et al.•ARTICLE•Current Anthropology•1978•Cited by: 7

    The paradigm for explanation in archaeology presented by the "new archaeologists" is reviewed and shown to need further elaboration. It is argued that that presentation has overemphasized the form of explanatory arguments and insufficiently considered their content. Not all explanatory arguments provide intuitively satisfactory explanations of particular observations. Instead, intuitively satisfactory explanations require general theories which s…

  • A Few Remarks on Whallon's 'A New Approach to Pottery Typology

    Open Access•Mario Borillo•ARTICLE•American Antiquity•1974•Cited by: 1

    Some implicit assumptions in Whallon's mathematically rigorous method for reproducing Ritchie's traditional Owasco pottery typology are pointed out, and some of the 'validity limits' of his conclusions are discussed

  • Formal procedures and the use of computers in archaeology

    Mario Borillo•ARTICLE•Norwegian Archaeological Review•1971•Cited by: 1

    It is well known that the introduction of rigorous semiological and mathematical methods is the necessary condition of the coherent application of computers to archaeology. The aim of this article is simply to emphasize two less obvious aspects of present research trends: (1) The different phases of archaeological work, at which the new methods are introduced, are interdependent. The solution adopted at each level — information retrieval, descrip…

  • Reply to the ‘comments on computers in archaeology’

    Mario Borillo•ARTICLE•Norwegian Archaeological Review•1971•References: 3

  • Formal procedures and the use of computers in archaeology

    Mario Borillo•ARTICLE•Norwegian Archaeological Review•1971•Cited by: 1

    It is well known that the introduction of rigorous semiological and mathematical methods is the necessary condition of the coherent application of computers to archaeology. The aim of this article is simply to emphasize two less obvious aspects of present research trends: (1) The different phases of archaeological work, at which the new methods are introduced, are interdependent. The solution adopted at each level — information retrieval, descrip…

  • A Few Remarks on Whallon's 'A New Approach to Pottery Typology

    Open Access•Mario Borillo•ARTICLE•American Antiquity•1974•Cited by: 1

    Some implicit assumptions in Whallon's mathematically rigorous method for reproducing Ritchie's traditional Owasco pottery typology are pointed out, and some of the 'validity limits' of his conclusions are discussed

  • Construction of a Deductive Model by Simulation of a Traditional Archaeological Study

    Open Access•Mario Borillo•ARTICLE•American Antiquity•1974•References: 3

    This article is based on 2 observations. First, I note the quality of certain traditional archaeological studies, focusing on evaluation of results obtained and of information used. Second, I observe the incoherence of many of the constructions of 'analytical' archaeologists, who sometimes naively imagine that it is possible to substitute sophisticated algorithms for analysis of the logic and archaeological meaning of problems in prehistory.The g…

  • Descriptive Statements, Covering Laws, and Theories in Archaeology [and Comments and Reply]

    D Read, Dwight W Read et al.•ARTICLE•Current Anthropology•1978•Cited by: 7

    The paradigm for explanation in archaeology presented by the "new archaeologists" is reviewed and shown to need further elaboration. It is argued that that presentation has overemphasized the form of explanatory arguments and insufficiently considered their content. Not all explanatory arguments provide intuitively satisfactory explanations of particular observations. Instead, intuitively satisfactory explanations require general theories which s…

  • Cogniticiens, encore un effort

    Mario Borillo•ARTICLE•Hermès•1988

  • A temporal reasoning cognitive approach

    Open Access•Andrée Borillo, Mario Borillo et al.•ARTICLE•Semiotica•1989

  • Pesquisa qualitativa no contexto da formação ao cuidado em saúde

    Open Access•Ellen Synthia Fernandes De Oliveira, Miriam Bras et al.•ARTICLE•Ciência & Saúde Coletiva•2024

Archaeology (5 works) · Computer Science (5 works) · History (5 works) · Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (3 works) · Epistemology (3 works) · History (2 works) · Mathematics (2 works) · Aesthetics (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae