Stephen Hawkin
Biographic Data
| ID | 3929143 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Stephen Hawkin |
| GIVEN NAMES | Stephen |
| FAMILY NAME | Hawkin |
| SIGNATURE | HAWKIN S |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-2190-3383 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 3 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 4 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Litigant status, judicial ideology, and the gatekeeping of expert evidence
Judicial rulings on expert evidence determine which specialized knowledge enters the courtroom and, in doing so, shape the credibility of litigants and the legitimacy of their claims. This article examines how disparities in litigant status shape the judicial gatekeeping of expert evidence and how this process relates to the ideological context of the legal forum. Using data from a probability sample of 811 Daubert rulings from United States Dist…
The changing dynamics of community care and support in rural Malawi: The impact on Women's health and wellbeing at end of life
Scientific Disciplines and the Admissibility of Expert Evidence in Courts
The authors examine how people interpret expert claims when they do not share experts' technical understanding. The authors review sociological research on the cultural boundaries of science and expertise, which suggests that scientific disciplines are heuristics nonspecialists use to evaluate experts' credibility. To test this idea, the authors examine judicial decisions about contested expert evidence in U.S. district courts ( n = 575). Multino…
Women's Health in Uganda: A Review of the Landscape of Reproductive Health in Uganda
The landscape surrounding reproductive health in Uganda is underpinned by layered interactions between a host of powerful factors, all of which contribute to grim health outcomes for Ugandan women. Yet, over the last two decades, several key interventions have demonstrated success in improving women’s reproductive health, including the implementation of diagonal approaches to healthcare delivery and grassroots educational programs. This review sy…
Scientific Disciplines and the Admissibility of Expert Evidence in Courts
The authors examine how people interpret expert claims when they do not share experts' technical understanding. The authors review sociological research on the cultural boundaries of science and expertise, which suggests that scientific disciplines are heuristics nonspecialists use to evaluate experts' credibility. To test this idea, the authors examine judicial decisions about contested expert evidence in U.S. district courts ( n = 575). Multino…
Women's Health in Uganda: A Review of the Landscape of Reproductive Health in Uganda
The landscape surrounding reproductive health in Uganda is underpinned by layered interactions between a host of powerful factors, all of which contribute to grim health outcomes for Ugandan women. Yet, over the last two decades, several key interventions have demonstrated success in improving women’s reproductive health, including the implementation of diagonal approaches to healthcare delivery and grassroots educational programs. This review sy…
The changing dynamics of community care and support in rural Malawi: The impact on Women's health and wellbeing at end of life
Scientific Disciplines and the Admissibility of Expert Evidence in Courts
The authors examine how people interpret expert claims when they do not share experts' technical understanding. The authors review sociological research on the cultural boundaries of science and expertise, which suggests that scientific disciplines are heuristics nonspecialists use to evaluate experts' credibility. To test this idea, the authors examine judicial decisions about contested expert evidence in U.S. district courts ( n = 575). Multino…
Litigant status, judicial ideology, and the gatekeeping of expert evidence
Judicial rulings on expert evidence determine which specialized knowledge enters the courtroom and, in doing so, shape the credibility of litigants and the legitimacy of their claims. This article examines how disparities in litigant status shape the judicial gatekeeping of expert evidence and how this process relates to the ideological context of the legal forum. Using data from a probability sample of 811 Daubert rulings from United States Dist…
Sociology (3 works) · Credibility (2 works) · Economic growth (2 works) · Health care (2 works) · Jury Decision Making Processes (2 works) · Medicine (2 works) · Multinomial logistic regression (2 works) · Nursing (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Psychology (2 works)