Marthe Gold
Biographic Data
| ID | 3929303 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Marthe Gold |
| GIVEN NAMES | Marthe |
| FAMILY NAME | Gold |
| SIGNATURE | GOLD M |
| AFFILIATIONS | Sanne Magnan and George Isham are with HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, MN. Sanne Magnan is also with the Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Marthe Gold is with the Center for Evaluation and Applied Research, New York Academy of Medicine, New York, NY. |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 8 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 11 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 8 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1996 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Moving towards social inclusion: Engaging rural voices in priority setting for health
BACKGROUND: Achieving universal health coverage (UHC) in the context of limited resources will require prioritising the most vulnerable and ensuring health policies and services are responsive to their needs. One way of addressing this is through the engagement of marginalised voices in the priority setting process. Public engagement approaches that enable group level deliberation as well as individual level preference capturing might be valuable…
Deliberative engagement methods on health care priority-setting in a rural South African community
Public engagement in priority-setting for health is increasingly recognized as a means to ensure more ethical, inclusive and legitimate decision-making processes, especially in the context of Universal Health Coverage where demands outweigh the available resources and difficult decisions need to be made. Deliberative approaches are often viewed as especially useful in considering social values and balancing trade-offs, however, implementation of …
Healthier People: Setting Targets for Life Expectancy and Health Care Expenditures
"Healthier People: Setting Targets for Life Expectancy and Health Care Expenditures." , 110(12), pp. 1733–1734
Lack of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses to Address Healthy People 2020 Priority Areas
Objectives. To examine the extent to which recently published cost-utility analyses (cost-effectiveness analyses using quality-adjusted life-years to measure health benefits) have covered the leading health concerns in the US Department of Health and Human Services Healthy People 2020 report. Methods. We examined data in the Tufts Medical Center Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry, a database containing 5000 published cost-utility analyses publi…
Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: Results from a randomized trial
Chicago, IL; Sacramento, CA; Silver Spring, MD; and Durham, NC, capturing a sociodemographically diverse sample with specific attention to ensuring inclusion of Hispanic, African-American, and elderly participants. Of 1774 people recruited, 75% participated: 961 took part in a deliberative method and 377 participants comprised the RMO control group. To assess effectiveness of the deliberative methods overall and of individual methods, we evaluate…
Catapulting the Chasm: Or How to Avoid Wasting a Perfectly Good Fiscal Disaster
The nation once again is on the precipice of financial catastrophe, but have we overlooked public health? Juxtaposed against one another, the comparison of health care with public health—one largely overutilized, expensive, and underperforming, the other responsible for eradicating diseases and providing safe food and water—cries out for thoughtful fiscal recalibration. We have examined the recent Institute of Medicine report on public health fin…
Improving Value Measurement in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
OBJECTIVE: Before cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) can fulfill its promise as a tool to guide health care allocation decisions, the method of incorporating societal values into CEA may need to be improved. DESIGN: The study design was a declarative exposition of potential fallacies in the theoretical underpinnings of CEA. Two values held by many people-preferences for giving priority to severely ill patients and preferences to avoid discriminati…
Assessing the Health of the Nation: The Predictive Validity of a Preference-Based Measure and Self-Rated Health
Health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) measures are becoming increasingly important for evaluating the effectiveness of medical interventions and assessing the health of populations. Preference-based instruments, a subset of HRQOL measures, allow comparisons of overall health status in populations and in clinical settings, and are suitable for economic analyses; but validity studies have used selected samples, mostly examining morbidity. This stu…
Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: Results from a randomized trial
Chicago, IL; Sacramento, CA; Silver Spring, MD; and Durham, NC, capturing a sociodemographically diverse sample with specific attention to ensuring inclusion of Hispanic, African-American, and elderly participants. Of 1774 people recruited, 75% participated: 961 took part in a deliberative method and 377 participants comprised the RMO control group. To assess effectiveness of the deliberative methods overall and of individual methods, we evaluate…
Healthier People: Setting Targets for Life Expectancy and Health Care Expenditures
"Healthier People: Setting Targets for Life Expectancy and Health Care Expenditures." , 110(12), pp. 1733–1734
Assessing the Health of the Nation: The Predictive Validity of a Preference-Based Measure and Self-Rated Health
Health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) measures are becoming increasingly important for evaluating the effectiveness of medical interventions and assessing the health of populations. Preference-based instruments, a subset of HRQOL measures, allow comparisons of overall health status in populations and in clinical settings, and are suitable for economic analyses; but validity studies have used selected samples, mostly examining morbidity. This stu…
Improving Value Measurement in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
OBJECTIVE: Before cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) can fulfill its promise as a tool to guide health care allocation decisions, the method of incorporating societal values into CEA may need to be improved. DESIGN: The study design was a declarative exposition of potential fallacies in the theoretical underpinnings of CEA. Two values held by many people-preferences for giving priority to severely ill patients and preferences to avoid discriminati…
Catapulting the Chasm: Or How to Avoid Wasting a Perfectly Good Fiscal Disaster
The nation once again is on the precipice of financial catastrophe, but have we overlooked public health? Juxtaposed against one another, the comparison of health care with public health—one largely overutilized, expensive, and underperforming, the other responsible for eradicating diseases and providing safe food and water—cries out for thoughtful fiscal recalibration. We have examined the recent Institute of Medicine report on public health fin…
Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: Results from a randomized trial
Chicago, IL; Sacramento, CA; Silver Spring, MD; and Durham, NC, capturing a sociodemographically diverse sample with specific attention to ensuring inclusion of Hispanic, African-American, and elderly participants. Of 1774 people recruited, 75% participated: 961 took part in a deliberative method and 377 participants comprised the RMO control group. To assess effectiveness of the deliberative methods overall and of individual methods, we evaluate…
Lack of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses to Address Healthy People 2020 Priority Areas
Objectives. To examine the extent to which recently published cost-utility analyses (cost-effectiveness analyses using quality-adjusted life-years to measure health benefits) have covered the leading health concerns in the US Department of Health and Human Services Healthy People 2020 report. Methods. We examined data in the Tufts Medical Center Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry, a database containing 5000 published cost-utility analyses publi…
Healthier People: Setting Targets for Life Expectancy and Health Care Expenditures
"Healthier People: Setting Targets for Life Expectancy and Health Care Expenditures." , 110(12), pp. 1733–1734
Deliberative engagement methods on health care priority-setting in a rural South African community
Public engagement in priority-setting for health is increasingly recognized as a means to ensure more ethical, inclusive and legitimate decision-making processes, especially in the context of Universal Health Coverage where demands outweigh the available resources and difficult decisions need to be made. Deliberative approaches are often viewed as especially useful in considering social values and balancing trade-offs, however, implementation of …
Moving towards social inclusion: Engaging rural voices in priority setting for health
BACKGROUND: Achieving universal health coverage (UHC) in the context of limited resources will require prioritising the most vulnerable and ensuring health policies and services are responsive to their needs. One way of addressing this is through the engagement of marginalised voices in the priority setting process. Public engagement approaches that enable group level deliberation as well as individual level preference capturing might be valuable…
Medicine (6 works) · Environmental health (4 works) · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Psychology (4 works) · Economic growth (3 works) · Economics (3 works) · Gerontology (3 works) · Gerontology (3 works) · Health care (3 works)