Jenni Burt
Biographic Data
| ID | 3932798 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Jenni Burt |
| GIVEN NAMES | Jenni |
| FAMILY NAME | Burt |
| SIGNATURE | BURT J |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Cambridge |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-0037-274X |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 7 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 9 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 7 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2015 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Why do people choose not to take part in screening? Qualitative interview study of atrial fibrillation screening nonparticipation
INTRODUCTION: While screening uptake is variable, many individuals feel they 'ought' to participate in screening programmes to aid the detection of conditions amenable to early treatment. Those not taking part in screening are often presented as either hindered by practical or social barriers or personally at fault. Why some people choose not to participate receives less consideration. METHODS: We explored screening nonparticipation by examining …
Guiding organisational decision-making about Covid-19 asymptomatic testing in workplaces
The consultation, together with other inputs, informed an ethical framework intended to support employers. The framework may support organisational decision-making in areas ranging from design and operation of the programme through to choices about participation. The framework is likely to benefit from further consultation and refinement in new settings
Patients’ use and views of real‐time feedback technology in general practice
BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in real-time feedback (RTF), which involves collecting and summarizing information about patient experience at the point of care with the aim of informing service improvement. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and acceptability of RTF in UK general practice. DESIGN: Exploratory randomized trial. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Ten general practices in south-west England and Cambridgeshire. All patients attendin…
Doctors’ engagements with patient experience surveys in primary and secondary care
BACKGROUND: Patient experience surveys are increasingly important in the measurement of, and attempts to improve, health-care quality. To date, little research has focused upon doctors' attitudes to surveys which give them personalized feedback. AIM: This paper explores doctors' perceptions of patient experience surveys in primary and secondary care settings in order to deepen understandings of how doctors view the plausibility of such surveys. D…
Wasting the doctor's time? A video-elicitation interview study with patients in primary care
The role of patient experience surveys in quality assurance and improvement
BACKGROUND: Despite widespread adoption of patient feedback surveys in international health-care systems, including the English NHS, evidence of a demonstrable impact of surveys on service improvement is sparse. OBJECTIVE: To explore the views of primary care practice staff regarding the utility of patient experience surveys. DESIGN: Qualitative focus groups. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Staff from 14 English general practices. RESULTS: Whilst parti…
Evaluating Differential Item Functioning in the English General Practice Patient Survey
All communication items in the English GP Patient Survey showed similar South Asian versus white British differences, with no evidence of DIF. In contrast, differences due to scale use or expectations are typically variable rather than constant across scales. While other possibilities remain, these findings increase the likelihood that the observed negative responses of South Asian patients to this national survey reflect true differences in thei…
The role of patient experience surveys in quality assurance and improvement
BACKGROUND: Despite widespread adoption of patient feedback surveys in international health-care systems, including the English NHS, evidence of a demonstrable impact of surveys on service improvement is sparse. OBJECTIVE: To explore the views of primary care practice staff regarding the utility of patient experience surveys. DESIGN: Qualitative focus groups. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Staff from 14 English general practices. RESULTS: Whilst parti…
Evaluating Differential Item Functioning in the English General Practice Patient Survey
All communication items in the English GP Patient Survey showed similar South Asian versus white British differences, with no evidence of DIF. In contrast, differences due to scale use or expectations are typically variable rather than constant across scales. While other possibilities remain, these findings increase the likelihood that the observed negative responses of South Asian patients to this national survey reflect true differences in thei…
Patients’ use and views of real‐time feedback technology in general practice
BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in real-time feedback (RTF), which involves collecting and summarizing information about patient experience at the point of care with the aim of informing service improvement. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and acceptability of RTF in UK general practice. DESIGN: Exploratory randomized trial. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Ten general practices in south-west England and Cambridgeshire. All patients attendin…
Doctors’ engagements with patient experience surveys in primary and secondary care
BACKGROUND: Patient experience surveys are increasingly important in the measurement of, and attempts to improve, health-care quality. To date, little research has focused upon doctors' attitudes to surveys which give them personalized feedback. AIM: This paper explores doctors' perceptions of patient experience surveys in primary and secondary care settings in order to deepen understandings of how doctors view the plausibility of such surveys. D…
Wasting the doctor's time? A video-elicitation interview study with patients in primary care
Guiding organisational decision-making about Covid-19 asymptomatic testing in workplaces
The consultation, together with other inputs, informed an ethical framework intended to support employers. The framework may support organisational decision-making in areas ranging from design and operation of the programme through to choices about participation. The framework is likely to benefit from further consultation and refinement in new settings
Why do people choose not to take part in screening? Qualitative interview study of atrial fibrillation screening nonparticipation
INTRODUCTION: While screening uptake is variable, many individuals feel they 'ought' to participate in screening programmes to aid the detection of conditions amenable to early treatment. Those not taking part in screening are often presented as either hindered by practical or social barriers or personally at fault. Why some people choose not to participate receives less consideration. METHODS: We explored screening nonparticipation by examining …
Medicine (6 works) · Psychology (6 works) · Family medicine (5 works) · Nursing (5 works) · Health care (4 works) · Medical education (4 works) · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 works) · Primary Care and Health Outcomes (4 works) · Patient experience (3 works) · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (3 works)