Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Jenni Burt

Biographic Data

ID3932798
NAMEJenni Burt
GIVEN NAMESJenni
FAMILY NAMEBurt
SIGNATUREBURT J
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Cambridge
ORCID0000-0002-0037-274X
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS7
TOTAL CITATIONS9
WORKS AS AUTHOR7
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2015
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2023
H-INDEX1
  • Why do people choose not to take part in screening? Qualitative interview study of atrial fibrillation screening nonparticipation

    Open Access•Sarah Hoare, Gwilym P A Thomas et al.•ARTICLE•Health Expectations•2023

    INTRODUCTION: While screening uptake is variable, many individuals feel they 'ought' to participate in screening programmes to aid the detection of conditions amenable to early treatment. Those not taking part in screening are often presented as either hindered by practical or social barriers or personally at fault. Why some people choose not to participate receives less consideration. METHODS: We explored screening nonparticipation by examining …

  • Guiding organisational decision-making about Covid-19 asymptomatic testing in workplaces

    Open Access•Jan W van der Scheer, Akbar Ansari et al.•ARTICLE•BMC Public Health•2022

    The consultation, together with other inputs, informed an ethical framework intended to support employers. The framework may support organisational decision-making in areas ranging from design and operation of the programme through to choices about participation. The framework is likely to benefit from further consultation and refinement in new settings

  • Patients’ use and views of real‐time feedback technology in general practice

    Open Access•Christine Wright, Adam Davey et al.•ARTICLE•Health Expectations•2017

    BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in real-time feedback (RTF), which involves collecting and summarizing information about patient experience at the point of care with the aim of informing service improvement. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and acceptability of RTF in UK general practice. DESIGN: Exploratory randomized trial. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Ten general practices in south-west England and Cambridgeshire. All patients attendin…

  • Doctors’ engagements with patient experience surveys in primary and secondary care

    Open Access•Conor Farrington, Jenni Burt et al.•ARTICLE•Health Expectations•2017

    BACKGROUND: Patient experience surveys are increasingly important in the measurement of, and attempts to improve, health-care quality. To date, little research has focused upon doctors' attitudes to surveys which give them personalized feedback. AIM: This paper explores doctors' perceptions of patient experience surveys in primary and secondary care settings in order to deepen understandings of how doctors view the plausibility of such surveys. D…

  • Wasting the doctor's time? A video-elicitation interview study with patients in primary care

    Open Access•Nadia Llanwarne, Jennifer Newbould et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•2017•Cited by: 9•References: 39

  • The role of patient experience surveys in quality assurance and improvement

    Open Access•Olga Boiko, John L Campbell et al.•ARTICLE•Health Expectations•2015

    BACKGROUND: Despite widespread adoption of patient feedback surveys in international health-care systems, including the English NHS, evidence of a demonstrable impact of surveys on service improvement is sparse. OBJECTIVE: To explore the views of primary care practice staff regarding the utility of patient experience surveys. DESIGN: Qualitative focus groups. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Staff from 14 English general practices. RESULTS: Whilst parti…

  • Evaluating Differential Item Functioning in the English General Practice Patient Survey

    Claude M Setodji, Shana R Grossman et al.•ARTICLE•Medical Care•2015•References: 33

    All communication items in the English GP Patient Survey showed similar South Asian versus white British differences, with no evidence of DIF. In contrast, differences due to scale use or expectations are typically variable rather than constant across scales. While other possibilities remain, these findings increase the likelihood that the observed negative responses of South Asian patients to this national survey reflect true differences in thei…

  • Wasting the doctor's time? A video-elicitation interview study with patients in primary care

    Open Access•Nadia Llanwarne, Jennifer Newbould et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•2017•Cited by: 9•References: 39

  • The role of patient experience surveys in quality assurance and improvement

    Open Access•Olga Boiko, John L Campbell et al.•ARTICLE•Health Expectations•2015

    BACKGROUND: Despite widespread adoption of patient feedback surveys in international health-care systems, including the English NHS, evidence of a demonstrable impact of surveys on service improvement is sparse. OBJECTIVE: To explore the views of primary care practice staff regarding the utility of patient experience surveys. DESIGN: Qualitative focus groups. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Staff from 14 English general practices. RESULTS: Whilst parti…

  • Evaluating Differential Item Functioning in the English General Practice Patient Survey

    Claude M Setodji, Shana R Grossman et al.•ARTICLE•Medical Care•2015•References: 33

    All communication items in the English GP Patient Survey showed similar South Asian versus white British differences, with no evidence of DIF. In contrast, differences due to scale use or expectations are typically variable rather than constant across scales. While other possibilities remain, these findings increase the likelihood that the observed negative responses of South Asian patients to this national survey reflect true differences in thei…

  • Patients’ use and views of real‐time feedback technology in general practice

    Open Access•Christine Wright, Adam Davey et al.•ARTICLE•Health Expectations•2017

    BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in real-time feedback (RTF), which involves collecting and summarizing information about patient experience at the point of care with the aim of informing service improvement. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and acceptability of RTF in UK general practice. DESIGN: Exploratory randomized trial. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Ten general practices in south-west England and Cambridgeshire. All patients attendin…

  • Doctors’ engagements with patient experience surveys in primary and secondary care

    Open Access•Conor Farrington, Jenni Burt et al.•ARTICLE•Health Expectations•2017

    BACKGROUND: Patient experience surveys are increasingly important in the measurement of, and attempts to improve, health-care quality. To date, little research has focused upon doctors' attitudes to surveys which give them personalized feedback. AIM: This paper explores doctors' perceptions of patient experience surveys in primary and secondary care settings in order to deepen understandings of how doctors view the plausibility of such surveys. D…

  • Wasting the doctor's time? A video-elicitation interview study with patients in primary care

    Open Access•Nadia Llanwarne, Jennifer Newbould et al.•ARTICLE•Social Science & Medicine•2017•Cited by: 9•References: 39

  • Guiding organisational decision-making about Covid-19 asymptomatic testing in workplaces

    Open Access•Jan W van der Scheer, Akbar Ansari et al.•ARTICLE•BMC Public Health•2022

    The consultation, together with other inputs, informed an ethical framework intended to support employers. The framework may support organisational decision-making in areas ranging from design and operation of the programme through to choices about participation. The framework is likely to benefit from further consultation and refinement in new settings

  • Why do people choose not to take part in screening? Qualitative interview study of atrial fibrillation screening nonparticipation

    Open Access•Sarah Hoare, Gwilym P A Thomas et al.•ARTICLE•Health Expectations•2023

    INTRODUCTION: While screening uptake is variable, many individuals feel they 'ought' to participate in screening programmes to aid the detection of conditions amenable to early treatment. Those not taking part in screening are often presented as either hindered by practical or social barriers or personally at fault. Why some people choose not to participate receives less consideration. METHODS: We explored screening nonparticipation by examining …

Medicine (6 works) · Psychology (6 works) · Family medicine (5 works) · Nursing (5 works) · Health care (4 works) · Medical education (4 works) · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 works) · Primary Care and Health Outcomes (4 works) · Patient experience (3 works) · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae