Marta Hernández‐jover
Biographic Data
| ID | 3938488 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Marta Hernández‐jover |
| GIVEN NAMES | Marta |
| FAMILY NAME | Hernández‐jover |
| SIGNATURE | JOVER M H |
| AFFILIATIONS | Charles Sturt University |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-8803-9062 |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 13 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 4 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2016 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Engaging Farmers in Biosecurity: Making Compliance Workable Within a Devolved Responsibility Approach
Devolution of responsibility to farmers and farming industries is an increasingly prominent approach to governing biosecurity risks in countries such as the United Kingdom, Aotearoa New Zealand and Australia. However, at the same time, the practices through which farmers exercise increased responsibility are expected to align with centralised biosecurity standards. Research to date argues that the ongoing emphasis on compliance either conflicts w…
Transforming the Australian agricultural biosecurity framework: The role of institutional logics
The Australian government has transformed the national biosecurity framework by shifting from a quarantine to a shared responsibility approach. This reflects a move from centralised to network‐based governance. While network governance enables the development of private and public networks needed to enact a shared responsibility approach, it can sit in tension with this approach, which requires the sharing of risk and legitimacy across an array o…
Devolved Responsibility and On-Farm Biosecurity: Practices of Biosecure Farming Care in Livestock Production
International efforts to prevent the spread of biological threats to agro-food production are increasingly being devolved from national governments to farming industries and farmers. Previous research has highlighted the farm-level and institutional challenges in engaging farmers in biosecurity. However, little is known sociologically about what farmers already know and do to manage disease risk, and specifically how they practice biosecurity. Th…
Harmonising devolved responsibility for biosecurity governance: The challenge of competing institutional logics
Harmonisation of disease management practices across global space and the devolution of responsibility to a broader range of actors are two increasingly important approaches for ordering biosecurity governance. While these forms of ordering have been examined individually, the social science biosecurity literature provides limited insights into how they interact and interfere with one another, and the consequences for biosecurity implementation. …
Devolved Responsibility and On-Farm Biosecurity: Practices of Biosecure Farming Care in Livestock Production
International efforts to prevent the spread of biological threats to agro-food production are increasingly being devolved from national governments to farming industries and farmers. Previous research has highlighted the farm-level and institutional challenges in engaging farmers in biosecurity. However, little is known sociologically about what farmers already know and do to manage disease risk, and specifically how they practice biosecurity. Th…
Harmonising devolved responsibility for biosecurity governance: The challenge of competing institutional logics
Harmonisation of disease management practices across global space and the devolution of responsibility to a broader range of actors are two increasingly important approaches for ordering biosecurity governance. While these forms of ordering have been examined individually, the social science biosecurity literature provides limited insights into how they interact and interfere with one another, and the consequences for biosecurity implementation. …
Transforming the Australian agricultural biosecurity framework: The role of institutional logics
The Australian government has transformed the national biosecurity framework by shifting from a quarantine to a shared responsibility approach. This reflects a move from centralised to network‐based governance. While network governance enables the development of private and public networks needed to enact a shared responsibility approach, it can sit in tension with this approach, which requires the sharing of risk and legitimacy across an array o…
Harmonising devolved responsibility for biosecurity governance: The challenge of competing institutional logics
Harmonisation of disease management practices across global space and the devolution of responsibility to a broader range of actors are two increasingly important approaches for ordering biosecurity governance. While these forms of ordering have been examined individually, the social science biosecurity literature provides limited insights into how they interact and interfere with one another, and the consequences for biosecurity implementation. …
Devolved Responsibility and On-Farm Biosecurity: Practices of Biosecure Farming Care in Livestock Production
International efforts to prevent the spread of biological threats to agro-food production are increasingly being devolved from national governments to farming industries and farmers. Previous research has highlighted the farm-level and institutional challenges in engaging farmers in biosecurity. However, little is known sociologically about what farmers already know and do to manage disease risk, and specifically how they practice biosecurity. Th…
Transforming the Australian agricultural biosecurity framework: The role of institutional logics
The Australian government has transformed the national biosecurity framework by shifting from a quarantine to a shared responsibility approach. This reflects a move from centralised to network‐based governance. While network governance enables the development of private and public networks needed to enact a shared responsibility approach, it can sit in tension with this approach, which requires the sharing of risk and legitimacy across an array o…
Engaging Farmers in Biosecurity: Making Compliance Workable Within a Devolved Responsibility Approach
Devolution of responsibility to farmers and farming industries is an increasingly prominent approach to governing biosecurity risks in countries such as the United Kingdom, Aotearoa New Zealand and Australia. However, at the same time, the practices through which farmers exercise increased responsibility are expected to align with centralised biosecurity standards. Research to date argues that the ongoing emphasis on compliance either conflicts w…
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (4 works) · Biosecurity (4 works) · Business (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Public relations (4 works) · Ecology (3 works) · Zoonotic diseases and public health (3 works) · Agriculture (2 works) · Corporate governance (2 works) · Ecology (2 works)