Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Noele Crossley

Biographic Data

ID3940627
NAMENoele Crossley
GIVEN NAMESNoele
FAMILY NAMECrossley
SIGNATURECROSSLEY N
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Oxford
ORCID0000-0001-7038-3527
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS6
TOTAL CITATIONS13
AUTHOR COUNT6
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2013
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2020
H-INDEX2
  • The African Union and Human Protection: Towards a Regional Protection Regime

    Noele Crossley•ARTICLE•African Security•2020

    A global discourse of protection and responsibility suggests that human protection norms have gained traction. Empirically, this coincides with an observed global reduction in violence. How does this relate to regional protection practices in Africa; is there a regional protection regime? If so, how is this regime constituted, and what does it comprise? Does it shape regional protection practices, and if so, in what ways? This article describes t…

  • Conceptualising Consistency: Coherence, Principles, and the Practice of Human Protection

    Open Access•Noele Crossley•ARTICLE•Global Responsibility to Protect•2020•Cited by: 1•References: 5

    ‘Consistency’ has a range of meanings in the context of human protection practice. This article conceptualises consistency – a basic premise for the legitimacy of norms, both procedurally as well as substantively. First, ‘consistency’ can refer to the coherence of the human protection framework. Second, consistency can refer to the degree to which protection responses adhere to international law and conform with international norms. Third, ‘consi…

  • Consistency, Protection, Responsibility: Revisiting the Debate on Selective Humanitarianism

    Open Access•Noele Crossley•ARTICLE•Global Governance A Review of…•2020•References: 11

    Selective humanitarianism, it has been argued, may be condonable, or even preferable. Several arguments have been proffered in support of these views. This article revisits these arguments in light of the emergence of a discourse of protection and responsibility that now incorporates a wider spectrum of protection measures available to agents, of which armed intervention is but one. Consistency is an essential characteristic of ethics and the law…

  • Explaining inconsistency: Motive, intent, and the practice of human protection

    Noele Crossley•ARTICLE•South African Journal of…•2020

    What accounts for the inconsistency of human protection practice? This article explores the role of motive and intent in determining collective responses to humanitarian crises. The article outlines the purpose and roles of protection agents – with a focus here on states acting collectively – as well as motives and intent. The study finds that, while human protection norms have gained traction and this is reflected in collective practice, respons…

  • Is R2P still controversial? Continuity and change in the debate on ‘humanitarian intervention’

    Noele Crossley•ARTICLE•Cambridge Review of International…•2018•Cited by: 10•References: 11

    Is the responsibility to protect (R2P) still controversial? The question is important because if R2P was no longer controversial, this would suggest that the principle is on track to consolidation as an international norm. The article assesses the impact of 16 years of sustained R2P advocacy and its influence on arguments within the scholarly community, and discusses the impact this engagement has had on the outline and substance of the principle…

  • A Model Case of R2P Prevention? Mediation in the Aftermath of Kenya’s 2007 Presidential Elections

    Noele Crossley•ARTICLE•Global Responsibility to Protect•2013•Cited by: 2

    The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) comprises the responsibility to prevent, to react, and to rebuild. What sets R2P apart from the previously prevailing idea of humanitarian intervention is, first, an emphasis on prevention, and second, a stated preference for a multilaterally coordinated response to crises. The third and perhaps newest feature of R2P is the idea that regional organisations have an important role to play in facilitating conflict…

  • Is R2P still controversial? Continuity and change in the debate on ‘humanitarian intervention’

    Noele Crossley•ARTICLE•Cambridge Review of International…•2018•Cited by: 10•References: 11

    Is the responsibility to protect (R2P) still controversial? The question is important because if R2P was no longer controversial, this would suggest that the principle is on track to consolidation as an international norm. The article assesses the impact of 16 years of sustained R2P advocacy and its influence on arguments within the scholarly community, and discusses the impact this engagement has had on the outline and substance of the principle…

  • A Model Case of R2P Prevention? Mediation in the Aftermath of Kenya’s 2007 Presidential Elections

    Noele Crossley•ARTICLE•Global Responsibility to Protect•2013•Cited by: 2

    The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) comprises the responsibility to prevent, to react, and to rebuild. What sets R2P apart from the previously prevailing idea of humanitarian intervention is, first, an emphasis on prevention, and second, a stated preference for a multilaterally coordinated response to crises. The third and perhaps newest feature of R2P is the idea that regional organisations have an important role to play in facilitating conflict…

  • Conceptualising Consistency: Coherence, Principles, and the Practice of Human Protection

    Open Access•Noele Crossley•ARTICLE•Global Responsibility to Protect•2020•Cited by: 1•References: 5

    ‘Consistency’ has a range of meanings in the context of human protection practice. This article conceptualises consistency – a basic premise for the legitimacy of norms, both procedurally as well as substantively. First, ‘consistency’ can refer to the coherence of the human protection framework. Second, consistency can refer to the degree to which protection responses adhere to international law and conform with international norms. Third, ‘consi…

  • A Model Case of R2P Prevention? Mediation in the Aftermath of Kenya’s 2007 Presidential Elections

    Noele Crossley•ARTICLE•Global Responsibility to Protect•2013•Cited by: 2

    The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) comprises the responsibility to prevent, to react, and to rebuild. What sets R2P apart from the previously prevailing idea of humanitarian intervention is, first, an emphasis on prevention, and second, a stated preference for a multilaterally coordinated response to crises. The third and perhaps newest feature of R2P is the idea that regional organisations have an important role to play in facilitating conflict…

  • Is R2P still controversial? Continuity and change in the debate on ‘humanitarian intervention’

    Noele Crossley•ARTICLE•Cambridge Review of International…•2018•Cited by: 10•References: 11

    Is the responsibility to protect (R2P) still controversial? The question is important because if R2P was no longer controversial, this would suggest that the principle is on track to consolidation as an international norm. The article assesses the impact of 16 years of sustained R2P advocacy and its influence on arguments within the scholarly community, and discusses the impact this engagement has had on the outline and substance of the principle…

  • The African Union and Human Protection: Towards a Regional Protection Regime

    Noele Crossley•ARTICLE•African Security•2020

    A global discourse of protection and responsibility suggests that human protection norms have gained traction. Empirically, this coincides with an observed global reduction in violence. How does this relate to regional protection practices in Africa; is there a regional protection regime? If so, how is this regime constituted, and what does it comprise? Does it shape regional protection practices, and if so, in what ways? This article describes t…

  • Conceptualising Consistency: Coherence, Principles, and the Practice of Human Protection

    Open Access•Noele Crossley•ARTICLE•Global Responsibility to Protect•2020•Cited by: 1•References: 5

    ‘Consistency’ has a range of meanings in the context of human protection practice. This article conceptualises consistency – a basic premise for the legitimacy of norms, both procedurally as well as substantively. First, ‘consistency’ can refer to the coherence of the human protection framework. Second, consistency can refer to the degree to which protection responses adhere to international law and conform with international norms. Third, ‘consi…

  • Consistency, Protection, Responsibility: Revisiting the Debate on Selective Humanitarianism

    Open Access•Noele Crossley•ARTICLE•Global Governance A Review of…•2020•References: 11

    Selective humanitarianism, it has been argued, may be condonable, or even preferable. Several arguments have been proffered in support of these views. This article revisits these arguments in light of the emergence of a discourse of protection and responsibility that now incorporates a wider spectrum of protection measures available to agents, of which armed intervention is but one. Consistency is an essential characteristic of ethics and the law…

  • Explaining inconsistency: Motive, intent, and the practice of human protection

    Noele Crossley•ARTICLE•South African Journal of…•2020

    What accounts for the inconsistency of human protection practice? This article explores the role of motive and intent in determining collective responses to humanitarian crises. The article outlines the purpose and roles of protection agents – with a focus here on states acting collectively – as well as motives and intent. The study finds that, while human protection norms have gained traction and this is reflected in collective practice, respons…

Global Peace and Security Dynamics (6 works) · Law (6 works) · Political science (6 works) · Law (5 works) · Sociology (5 works) · Human rights (4 works) · Law and economics (4 works) · Responsibility to Protect (4 works) · International law (3 works) · Peacebuilding and International Security (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae