Emiliano Lorini
Biographic Data
| ID | 3943273 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Emiliano Lorini |
| GIVEN NAMES | Emiliano |
| FAMILY NAME | Lorini |
| SIGNATURE | LORINI E |
| AFFILIATIONS | Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-7014-6756 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 7 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 5 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 7 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2008 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2019 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Social Intelligence
Epistemic logic meets epistemic game theory: A comparison between multi-agent Kripke models and type spaces
In the literature there are at least two main formal structures to deal with situations of interactive epistemology: Kripke models and type spaces. As shown in many papers (see Aumann and Brandenburger in Econometrica 36:1161–1180, 1995; Baltag et al. in Synthese 169:301–333, 2009; Battigalli and Bonanno in Res Econ 53(2):149–225, 1999; Battigalli and Siniscalchi in J Econ Theory 106:356–391, 2002; Klein and Pacuit in Stud Log 102:297–319, 2014; …
A minimal logic for interactive epistemology
Foreword to the Synthese special issue on theories of information dynamics and interaction and their application to dialogue
Computer-mediated trust in self-interested expert recommendations
On the dynamics of institutional agreements
In this paper we investigate a logic for modelling individual and collective acceptances that is called acceptance logic. The logic has formulae of the form $${\rm A}_{G:x} \varphi$$ reading ‘if the agents in the set of agents G identify themselves with institution x then they together accept that $${\varphi}$$ ’. We extend acceptance logic by two kinds of dynamic modal operators. The first kind are public announcements of the form $${x!\psi}$$ ,…
A logic of intention and attempt
A logic of intention and attempt
Epistemic logic meets epistemic game theory: A comparison between multi-agent Kripke models and type spaces
In the literature there are at least two main formal structures to deal with situations of interactive epistemology: Kripke models and type spaces. As shown in many papers (see Aumann and Brandenburger in Econometrica 36:1161–1180, 1995; Baltag et al. in Synthese 169:301–333, 2009; Battigalli and Bonanno in Res Econ 53(2):149–225, 1999; Battigalli and Siniscalchi in J Econ Theory 106:356–391, 2002; Klein and Pacuit in Stud Log 102:297–319, 2014; …
A logic of intention and attempt
On the dynamics of institutional agreements
In this paper we investigate a logic for modelling individual and collective acceptances that is called acceptance logic. The logic has formulae of the form $${\rm A}_{G:x} \varphi$$ reading ‘if the agents in the set of agents G identify themselves with institution x then they together accept that $${\varphi}$$ ’. We extend acceptance logic by two kinds of dynamic modal operators. The first kind are public announcements of the form $${x!\psi}$$ ,…
Computer-mediated trust in self-interested expert recommendations
Foreword to the Synthese special issue on theories of information dynamics and interaction and their application to dialogue
Epistemic logic meets epistemic game theory: A comparison between multi-agent Kripke models and type spaces
In the literature there are at least two main formal structures to deal with situations of interactive epistemology: Kripke models and type spaces. As shown in many papers (see Aumann and Brandenburger in Econometrica 36:1161–1180, 1995; Baltag et al. in Synthese 169:301–333, 2009; Battigalli and Bonanno in Res Econ 53(2):149–225, 1999; Battigalli and Siniscalchi in J Econ Theory 106:356–391, 2002; Klein and Pacuit in Stud Log 102:297–319, 2014; …
A minimal logic for interactive epistemology
Social Intelligence
Computer Science (6 works) · Epistemology (5 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Description logic (4 works) · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 works) · Multimodal logic (4 works) · Artificial Intelligence (3 works) · Artificial Intelligence (3 works) · Epistemic modal logic (3 works) · Mathematics (3 works)