Lucian Arye Bebchuk
Biographic Data
| ID | 3960622 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Lucian Arye Bebchuk |
| GIVEN NAMES | Lucian Arye |
| FAMILY NAME | Bebchuk |
| SIGNATURE | BEBCHUK L A |
| AFFILIATIONS | William J. Friedman Professor of Law, Economics and Finance, Harvard Law School, and Research Associate, National Bureau of Economic Research, both in Cambridge, Massachusetts. |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 7 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 78 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 7 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1984 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2003 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
The Case for Increasing Shareholder Power
This paper reconsiders the basic allocation of power between boards and shareholders in publicly traded companies with dispersed ownership.U.S. corporate law has long precluded shareholders from initiating any changes in the company's basic governance arrangements.My analysis and empirical evidence indicate that shareholders' existing power to replace directors is insufficient to secure the adoption of value-increasing governance arrangements tha…
Executive Compensation as an Agency Problem
This paper provides an overview of the main theoretical elements and empirical underpinnings of a "managerial power" approach to executive compensation. Under this approach, the design of executive compensation is viewed not only as an instrument for addressing the agency problem between managers and shareholders but also as part of the agency problem itself. Boards of publicly traded companies with dispersed ownership, we argue, cannot be expect…
The Powerful Antitakeover Force of Staggered Boards
Lucian Arye Bebchuk, John C. Coates IV, Guhan Subramanian, The Powerful Antitakeover Force of Staggered Boards: Further Findings and a Reply to Symposium Participants, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 55, No. 3 (Dec., 2002), pp. 885-917
The Powerful Antitakeover Force of Staggered Boards
Lucian Arye Bebchuk, John C. Coates IV, Guhan Subramanian, The Powerful Antitakeover Force of Staggered Boards: Theory, Evidence, and Policy, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 54, No. 5 (May, 2002), pp. 887-951
Reconsidering Contractual Liability and the Incentive to Reveal Information
In an earlier work, we analyzed how the legal rules governing contractual liability affect the transfer of information between the parties to the contract. In particular, we showed how limitations on contractual liability might lead high valuation buyers to reveal their valuation of performance, and we identified the circumstances under which such limitations on liability are and are not socially desirable. In an article forthcoming in the Stanfo…
A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Ownership and Governance
Litigation and Settlement under Imperfect Information
A model of parties' litigation and settlement decisions under imperfect information is studied. The model shows how informational asymmetry influences parties' decisions, and how it might lead to parties' failure to settle. The model is used to identify how the likelihood of settlement and the settlement amount are shaped by various factors--the size of the amount at stake, the magnitude of the parties' litigation costs, and the nature of the par…
A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Ownership and Governance
Executive Compensation as an Agency Problem
This paper provides an overview of the main theoretical elements and empirical underpinnings of a "managerial power" approach to executive compensation. Under this approach, the design of executive compensation is viewed not only as an instrument for addressing the agency problem between managers and shareholders but also as part of the agency problem itself. Boards of publicly traded companies with dispersed ownership, we argue, cannot be expect…
The Powerful Antitakeover Force of Staggered Boards
Lucian Arye Bebchuk, John C. Coates IV, Guhan Subramanian, The Powerful Antitakeover Force of Staggered Boards: Theory, Evidence, and Policy, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 54, No. 5 (May, 2002), pp. 887-951
The Case for Increasing Shareholder Power
This paper reconsiders the basic allocation of power between boards and shareholders in publicly traded companies with dispersed ownership.U.S. corporate law has long precluded shareholders from initiating any changes in the company's basic governance arrangements.My analysis and empirical evidence indicate that shareholders' existing power to replace directors is insufficient to secure the adoption of value-increasing governance arrangements tha…
The Powerful Antitakeover Force of Staggered Boards
Lucian Arye Bebchuk, John C. Coates IV, Guhan Subramanian, The Powerful Antitakeover Force of Staggered Boards: Further Findings and a Reply to Symposium Participants, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 55, No. 3 (Dec., 2002), pp. 885-917
Litigation and Settlement under Imperfect Information
A model of parties' litigation and settlement decisions under imperfect information is studied. The model shows how informational asymmetry influences parties' decisions, and how it might lead to parties' failure to settle. The model is used to identify how the likelihood of settlement and the settlement amount are shaped by various factors--the size of the amount at stake, the magnitude of the parties' litigation costs, and the nature of the par…
Reconsidering Contractual Liability and the Incentive to Reveal Information
In an earlier work, we analyzed how the legal rules governing contractual liability affect the transfer of information between the parties to the contract. In particular, we showed how limitations on contractual liability might lead high valuation buyers to reveal their valuation of performance, and we identified the circumstances under which such limitations on liability are and are not socially desirable. In an article forthcoming in the Stanfo…
A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Ownership and Governance
The Powerful Antitakeover Force of Staggered Boards
Lucian Arye Bebchuk, John C. Coates IV, Guhan Subramanian, The Powerful Antitakeover Force of Staggered Boards: Further Findings and a Reply to Symposium Participants, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 55, No. 3 (Dec., 2002), pp. 885-917
The Powerful Antitakeover Force of Staggered Boards
Lucian Arye Bebchuk, John C. Coates IV, Guhan Subramanian, The Powerful Antitakeover Force of Staggered Boards: Theory, Evidence, and Policy, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 54, No. 5 (May, 2002), pp. 887-951
The Case for Increasing Shareholder Power
This paper reconsiders the basic allocation of power between boards and shareholders in publicly traded companies with dispersed ownership.U.S. corporate law has long precluded shareholders from initiating any changes in the company's basic governance arrangements.My analysis and empirical evidence indicate that shareholders' existing power to replace directors is insufficient to secure the adoption of value-increasing governance arrangements tha…
Executive Compensation as an Agency Problem
This paper provides an overview of the main theoretical elements and empirical underpinnings of a "managerial power" approach to executive compensation. Under this approach, the design of executive compensation is viewed not only as an instrument for addressing the agency problem between managers and shareholders but also as part of the agency problem itself. Boards of publicly traded companies with dispersed ownership, we argue, cannot be expect…
Business (4 works) · Economics (4 works) · Corporate Insolvency and Governance (3 works) · Finance (3 works) · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (3 works) · Microeconomics (3 works) · Corporate Finance and Governance (2 works) · Finance (2 works) · Law and economics (2 works) · Accounting (1 work)