Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

James Rachels

Biographic Data

ID3973693
NAMEJames Rachels
GIVEN NAMESJames
FAMILY NAMERachels
SIGNATURERACHELS J
AFFILIATIONSNew York University
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS16
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR16
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1968
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2021
H-INDEX0
  • Problems from Philosophy

    James Rachels, Stuart Rachel et al.•BOOK•Problems from Philosophy•2021

  • Elements of Moral Philosophy

    Stuart Rachel, James Rachels et al.•BOOK•Elements of Moral Philosophy•2018

  • Problems from Philosophy

    James Rachels, Stuart Rachel et al.•BOOK•Problems from Philosophy•2011

  • The elements of moral philosophy

    James Rachels, Behrouz A Forouzan•BOOK•The elements of moral philosophy•2003

  • Can ethics provide answers

    James Rachels•BOOK•Can ethics provide answers?•1997

  • The Morality of Species

    Dale Jamieson, James Rachels•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•1991

  • Created from Animals

    James Rachels•BOOK•Created from animals•1990

    Since the Origin of Species was first published, Darwinism has been attacked for undermining traditional morality. In particular, because it emphasizes the kinship between humans and other animals, Darwinism seems incompatible with the traditional idea of human dignity - that human life has a special value, while other animals may be sacrificed for any purpose that humans choose. This book argues that Darwinism does undermine the traditional idea…

  • "Ordinary" and "Extraordinary" Vary with the Case

    James V Hickey, Sharon A Fischer et al.•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•1983

  • Barney Clark's Key

    James Rachels•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•1983

    Artificial heart recipient Barney Clark was given a key that would\nhave allowed him to turn off the compressor that ran the heart if he had no\nlonger wished to live tethered to a machine. Rachels argues that Clark's use\nof the key would have been suicide, refutes possible objections to the use of\nthe term in this context, and sees ethical implications for social acceptance\nof suicide and voluntary euthanasia in the public act of giving Clark…

  • Sociobiology and the 'Escalator' of Reason

    James Rachels, Peter Singer•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•1981

    book review

  • Can Ethics Provide Answers

    James Rachels•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•1980

  • Case Studies in Bioethics

    Hunter C Leake, James Rachels et al.•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•1979

  • Active and Passive Euthanasia

    James Rachels•ARTICLE•New England Journal of Medicine•1975

    The traditional distinction between active and passive euthanasia requires critical analysis. The conventional doctrine is that there is such an important moral difference between the two that, although the latter is sometimes permissible, the former is always forbidden. This doctrine may be challenged for several reasons. First of all, active euthanasia is in many cases more humane than passive euthanasia, Secondly, the conventional doctrine lea…

  • Evaluating from a point of view

    Open Access•James Rachels•ARTICLE•The Journal of Value Inquiry•1972

  • God and Human Attitudes

    Open Access•James Rachels•ARTICLE•Religious Studies•1971

    Kneeling down or grovelling on the ground, even to express your reverence for heavenly things, is contrary to human dignity

  • Wants, Reasons, and Justifications

    James Rachels•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•1968

    Journal Article Wants, Reasons, and Justifications Get access James Rachels James Rachels New York University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 18, Issue 73, October 1968, Pages 299–309, https://doi.org/10.2307/2217791 Published: 01 October 1968

No prominent works on this page.

  • Wants, Reasons, and Justifications

    James Rachels•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•1968

    Journal Article Wants, Reasons, and Justifications Get access James Rachels James Rachels New York University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 18, Issue 73, October 1968, Pages 299–309, https://doi.org/10.2307/2217791 Published: 01 October 1968

  • God and Human Attitudes

    Open Access•James Rachels•ARTICLE•Religious Studies•1971

    Kneeling down or grovelling on the ground, even to express your reverence for heavenly things, is contrary to human dignity

  • Evaluating from a point of view

    Open Access•James Rachels•ARTICLE•The Journal of Value Inquiry•1972

  • Active and Passive Euthanasia

    James Rachels•ARTICLE•New England Journal of Medicine•1975

    The traditional distinction between active and passive euthanasia requires critical analysis. The conventional doctrine is that there is such an important moral difference between the two that, although the latter is sometimes permissible, the former is always forbidden. This doctrine may be challenged for several reasons. First of all, active euthanasia is in many cases more humane than passive euthanasia, Secondly, the conventional doctrine lea…

  • Case Studies in Bioethics

    Hunter C Leake, James Rachels et al.•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•1979

  • Can Ethics Provide Answers

    James Rachels•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•1980

  • Sociobiology and the 'Escalator' of Reason

    James Rachels, Peter Singer•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•1981

    book review

  • "Ordinary" and "Extraordinary" Vary with the Case

    James V Hickey, Sharon A Fischer et al.•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•1983

  • Barney Clark's Key

    James Rachels•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•1983

    Artificial heart recipient Barney Clark was given a key that would\nhave allowed him to turn off the compressor that ran the heart if he had no\nlonger wished to live tethered to a machine. Rachels argues that Clark's use\nof the key would have been suicide, refutes possible objections to the use of\nthe term in this context, and sees ethical implications for social acceptance\nof suicide and voluntary euthanasia in the public act of giving Clark…

  • Created from Animals

    James Rachels•BOOK•Created from animals•1990

    Since the Origin of Species was first published, Darwinism has been attacked for undermining traditional morality. In particular, because it emphasizes the kinship between humans and other animals, Darwinism seems incompatible with the traditional idea of human dignity - that human life has a special value, while other animals may be sacrificed for any purpose that humans choose. This book argues that Darwinism does undermine the traditional idea…

  • The Morality of Species

    Dale Jamieson, James Rachels•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•1991

  • Can ethics provide answers

    James Rachels•BOOK•Can ethics provide answers?•1997

  • The elements of moral philosophy

    James Rachels, Behrouz A Forouzan•BOOK•The elements of moral philosophy•2003

  • Problems from Philosophy

    James Rachels, Stuart Rachel et al.•BOOK•Problems from Philosophy•2011

  • Elements of Moral Philosophy

    Stuart Rachel, James Rachels et al.•BOOK•Elements of Moral Philosophy•2018

  • Problems from Philosophy

    James Rachels, Stuart Rachel et al.•BOOK•Problems from Philosophy•2021

Psychology (7 works) · Epistemology (5 works) · Law (5 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Political science (5 works) · Sociology (4 works) · Ethics (3 works) · Ethics (3 works) · Ethics in medical practice (3 works) · Medicine (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae