Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Michael S Fox

Biographic Data

ID3975004
NAMEMichael S Fox
GIVEN NAMESMichael S
FAMILY NAMEFox
SIGNATUREFOX M S
AFFILIATIONSYale University
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS3
TOTAL CITATIONS4
AUTHOR COUNT3
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1991
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR1993
H-INDEX1
  • Political Culture, Purges, and Proletarianization at the Institute of Red Professors, 1921-1929

    Michael S Fox•ARTICLE•The Russian Review•1993•Cited by: 1

    The Bolshevik Party emerged from the Civil War with a reinforced distrust of bourgeois specialists and bourgeois intellectuals, yet with an urgent need to compromise with them in order to rebuild society. At the same time, grandiose plans abounded within the party to fashion a new social stratum-a proletarian, socialist, or workerpeasant intelligentsia-that would make reliance on the old elites superfluous.1 In the early 1920s, a new hierarchy of…

  • Glavlit, censorship and the problem of party policy in cultural affairs, 1922–28

    Michael S Fox•ARTICLE•Soviet Studies•1992•Cited by: 3•References: 6

    CENSORSHIP IN SOVIET RUSSIA as it was reorganised after the end of the civil war was not a simple process of striking out words or banning books. In the course of the 1920s it became an increasingly complex system of pre-publication control and post-publication evaluation, involving myriad party and state agencies, of which the Main Directorate on Literature and Presses (Glavnoe upravlenie po delam literatury i izdatel'stv, or Glavlit), was only …

  • Ante Ciliga, Trotskii, and State Capitalism: Theory, Tactics, and Reevaluation during the Purge Era, 1935-1939

    Open Access•Michael S Fox•ARTICLE•Slavic Review•1991•References: 3

    The Moscow Trials forced the international anti-Stalinist Left to reconsider its most fundamental truths. The old, rigid categories of capitalism and socialism were no longer certain; a new urgency accompanied the question of where the revolution had gone astray. Many of the most outspoken anti-Stalinists searching for new answers had been either adherents or sympathizers of Trotskii. For many of these former staunch supporters, Trotskii's theore…

  • Glavlit, censorship and the problem of party policy in cultural affairs, 1922–28

    Michael S Fox•ARTICLE•Soviet Studies•1992•Cited by: 3•References: 6

    CENSORSHIP IN SOVIET RUSSIA as it was reorganised after the end of the civil war was not a simple process of striking out words or banning books. In the course of the 1920s it became an increasingly complex system of pre-publication control and post-publication evaluation, involving myriad party and state agencies, of which the Main Directorate on Literature and Presses (Glavnoe upravlenie po delam literatury i izdatel'stv, or Glavlit), was only …

  • Political Culture, Purges, and Proletarianization at the Institute of Red Professors, 1921-1929

    Michael S Fox•ARTICLE•The Russian Review•1993•Cited by: 1

    The Bolshevik Party emerged from the Civil War with a reinforced distrust of bourgeois specialists and bourgeois intellectuals, yet with an urgent need to compromise with them in order to rebuild society. At the same time, grandiose plans abounded within the party to fashion a new social stratum-a proletarian, socialist, or workerpeasant intelligentsia-that would make reliance on the old elites superfluous.1 In the early 1920s, a new hierarchy of…

  • Ante Ciliga, Trotskii, and State Capitalism: Theory, Tactics, and Reevaluation during the Purge Era, 1935-1939

    Open Access•Michael S Fox•ARTICLE•Slavic Review•1991•References: 3

    The Moscow Trials forced the international anti-Stalinist Left to reconsider its most fundamental truths. The old, rigid categories of capitalism and socialism were no longer certain; a new urgency accompanied the question of where the revolution had gone astray. Many of the most outspoken anti-Stalinists searching for new answers had been either adherents or sympathizers of Trotskii. For many of these former staunch supporters, Trotskii's theore…

  • Glavlit, censorship and the problem of party policy in cultural affairs, 1922–28

    Michael S Fox•ARTICLE•Soviet Studies•1992•Cited by: 3•References: 6

    CENSORSHIP IN SOVIET RUSSIA as it was reorganised after the end of the civil war was not a simple process of striking out words or banning books. In the course of the 1920s it became an increasingly complex system of pre-publication control and post-publication evaluation, involving myriad party and state agencies, of which the Main Directorate on Literature and Presses (Glavnoe upravlenie po delam literatury i izdatel'stv, or Glavlit), was only …

  • Political Culture, Purges, and Proletarianization at the Institute of Red Professors, 1921-1929

    Michael S Fox•ARTICLE•The Russian Review•1993•Cited by: 1

    The Bolshevik Party emerged from the Civil War with a reinforced distrust of bourgeois specialists and bourgeois intellectuals, yet with an urgent need to compromise with them in order to rebuild society. At the same time, grandiose plans abounded within the party to fashion a new social stratum-a proletarian, socialist, or workerpeasant intelligentsia-that would make reliance on the old elites superfluous.1 In the early 1920s, a new hierarchy of…

Law (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Politics (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Soviet and Russian History (3 works) · Eastern European Communism and Reforms (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Anarchism and Radical Politics (1 works) · Balkans: History, Politics, Society (1 works) · Bureaucracy (1 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae