Philip Hamburger
Biographic Data
| ID | 3999964 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Philip Hamburger |
| GIVEN NAMES | Philip |
| FAMILY NAME | Hamburger |
| SIGNATURE | HAMBURGER P |
| AFFILIATIONS | Fortis Memorial Research Institute |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 10 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 14 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 10 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1983 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2005 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
The New Censorship: Institutional Review Boards
Are federal regulations on Institutional Review Boards - commonly known as IRBs - compatible with the First Amendment? The regulations aim to protect human subjects by creating a system of licensing research. Under this system, universities establish IRBs, and researchers must get the prior permission of an IRB before doing research on human subjects. At first glance, it may seem only appropriate that researchers should get permission before perf…
Separation of Church and State
Separation of Church and State Get access Hamburger Philip. Separation of Church and State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002. xiii, 514 pp. $57.50 (cloth); $19.95 (paper). Daniel L. Dreisbach Daniel L. Dreisbach American University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar American Journal of Legal History, Volume 47, Issue 3, July 2005, Pages 338–340, https://doi.org/10.2307/30039538 Published: 01 July 200…
Separation of Church and State
Separation of Church and State
Hamburger argues that separation of church and state has no historical foundation in the First Amendment and shows that eighteenth-century Americans almost never invoked this principle. Although Jefferson and others retrospectively claimed a First Amendment basis for separation, it became part of American constitutional law only much later.
Separation of Church and State
Equality and Diversity: The Eighteenth-Century Debate about Equal Protection and Equal Civil Rights
The Constitution's Accommodation of Social Change
The Development of the Nineteenth-Century Consensus Theory of Contract
The consensus theory is well known. According to consensus theory, contract is the product of the consensus or “meeting of the minds” of contracting parties; if there is no consensus, there is no contract. Today, even after repeated challenges, consensus theory continues to be important and even essential in many approaches to contract
The Development of the Law of Seditious Libel and the Control of the Press
This article presents a new account of the development of the law of seditious libel from the late sixteenth century to the early eighteenth. It also outlines a new version of the relationship between the government and the press during that period. The article argues that it was the gradual erosion, during the late sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, of the legal foundations of the government's policies toward the press that eventually made nec…
The Conveyancing Purposes of the Statute of Frauds
Journal Article The Conveyancing Purposes of the Statute of Frauds Get access Philip Hamburger Philip Hamburger *Associate at Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. This article received Yale Law School's Colby Townsend Memorial Prize and its Connecticut Attorneys' Guaranty Fund Prize (1981). Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar American Journal of Legal History, Volume 27, Issue 4, Octo…
The Development of the Law of Seditious Libel and the Control of the Press
This article presents a new account of the development of the law of seditious libel from the late sixteenth century to the early eighteenth. It also outlines a new version of the relationship between the government and the press during that period. The article argues that it was the gradual erosion, during the late sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, of the legal foundations of the government's policies toward the press that eventually made nec…
The Development of the Nineteenth-Century Consensus Theory of Contract
The consensus theory is well known. According to consensus theory, contract is the product of the consensus or “meeting of the minds” of contracting parties; if there is no consensus, there is no contract. Today, even after repeated challenges, consensus theory continues to be important and even essential in many approaches to contract
Equality and Diversity: The Eighteenth-Century Debate about Equal Protection and Equal Civil Rights
Separation of Church and State
The Conveyancing Purposes of the Statute of Frauds
Journal Article The Conveyancing Purposes of the Statute of Frauds Get access Philip Hamburger Philip Hamburger *Associate at Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. This article received Yale Law School's Colby Townsend Memorial Prize and its Connecticut Attorneys' Guaranty Fund Prize (1981). Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar American Journal of Legal History, Volume 27, Issue 4, Octo…
The Development of the Law of Seditious Libel and the Control of the Press
This article presents a new account of the development of the law of seditious libel from the late sixteenth century to the early eighteenth. It also outlines a new version of the relationship between the government and the press during that period. The article argues that it was the gradual erosion, during the late sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, of the legal foundations of the government's policies toward the press that eventually made nec…
The Constitution's Accommodation of Social Change
The Development of the Nineteenth-Century Consensus Theory of Contract
The consensus theory is well known. According to consensus theory, contract is the product of the consensus or “meeting of the minds” of contracting parties; if there is no consensus, there is no contract. Today, even after repeated challenges, consensus theory continues to be important and even essential in many approaches to contract
Equality and Diversity: The Eighteenth-Century Debate about Equal Protection and Equal Civil Rights
Separation of Church and State
Hamburger argues that separation of church and state has no historical foundation in the First Amendment and shows that eighteenth-century Americans almost never invoked this principle. Although Jefferson and others retrospectively claimed a First Amendment basis for separation, it became part of American constitutional law only much later.
Separation of Church and State
Separation of Church and State
The New Censorship: Institutional Review Boards
Are federal regulations on Institutional Review Boards - commonly known as IRBs - compatible with the First Amendment? The regulations aim to protect human subjects by creating a system of licensing research. Under this system, universities establish IRBs, and researchers must get the prior permission of an IRB before doing research on human subjects. At first glance, it may seem only appropriate that researchers should get permission before perf…
Separation of Church and State
Separation of Church and State Get access Hamburger Philip. Separation of Church and State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002. xiii, 514 pp. $57.50 (cloth); $19.95 (paper). Daniel L. Dreisbach Daniel L. Dreisbach American University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar American Journal of Legal History, Volume 47, Issue 3, July 2005, Pages 338–340, https://doi.org/10.2307/30039538 Published: 01 July 200…
Law (9 works) · Political science (9 works) · American Constitutional Law and Politics (8 works) · Computer Science (6 works) · Law (5 works) · Politics (5 works) · Separation of church and state (4 works) · Law and economics (3 works) · Business (2 works) · Economics (2 works)